Bethany Mandel BOE candidate "befriending Neo Nazi's"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hear her on the radio sometimes. She makes a lot of sense. Very glad that she is willing to take a run at local politics

So you appreciate right wing nut jobs? Uh, Ok.

But, just so we are clear, what qualifies her to run for BOE?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mandel must be right over the target with the amount of viscous vitriol coming from this forum.

Because many of these posters are wrong about most things, it's probably worth giving her a closer look.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hear her on the radio sometimes. She makes a lot of sense. Very glad that she is willing to take a run at local politics

So you appreciate right wing nut jobs? Uh, Ok.

But, just so we are clear, what qualifies her to run for BOE?

Is right wing anyone who isn't far left?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mandel must be right over the target with the amount of viscous vitriol coming from this forum.

Vitriol is not viscous.

C'mon - that's spreading it thick!

[Anonymous]

She is a known raging psychopath.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hear her on the radio sometimes. She makes a lot of sense. Very glad that she is willing to take a run at local politics

So you appreciate right wing nut jobs? Uh, Ok.

But, just so we are clear, what qualifies her to run for BOE?

Nothing she is an uneducated twat who. thinks kids should be friends with "neo nazis"

Her scrubbed tweets can be found all over the internet they are horrific.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mandel must be right over the target with the amount of viscous vitriol coming from this forum.

Because many of these posters are wrong about most things, it's probably worth giving her a closer look.

Absolutely, start here.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/bethany-mandel-conservative-school-board-1234968716/

https://au.news.yahoo.com/social-media-cringiest-conservative-running-150059689.html

Mandel fumbled. “Woke is sort of the idea that, um,” she says, before stumbling more. The clip is uncomfortable, and naturally it was posted everywhere."

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/03/bethany-mandel-define-woke-video-stolen-youth.html

These are just a few.
I won't post her in Nazi garb yes she dressed as a Nazi with her husband.

She is Moms4liberty dumb as rocks garbage. That is me being nice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mandel must be right over the target with the amount of viscous vitriol coming from this forum.

Because many of these posters are wrong about most things, it's probably worth giving her a closer look.

They actually aren’t wrong a lot of times. Does the message come out a little crazy? Totally. So is this person. If you have any shred of human decency in you, do not vote for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She is a known raging psychopath.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have no idea who this person is, but OP is heavy on name calling and accusations, written extremely emotionally, and is light on evidence. Very unconvincing and makes me immediately assume many of these quotes and claims are made in bad faith.

Then why don’t you take the time to educate yourself about her rather than making a super pointless comment on DCUM?

I think if you're trying to convince people of something but you come across as a little deranged, it's useful to get feedback on it so you can do a better job in the future. But if the goal of the post was not to be convincing but rather to scream into the void, I agree with you that my comment was pointless.

A bit of sanity in this otherwise insane thread.

I agree that not having kids in public school should disqualify her. The rest of it comes off as unhinged.

And I'm generally leaning right, and I don't send my kids to PS either, but it seems very basic to require a child in the system to be on the board.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
She's a famous right winger
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethany_Mandel

She wrote a book called "woke", went on TV to promote it, and couldn't define the term.

https://slate.com/news-and-politic
s/2023/03/bethany-mandel-define-woke-video-stolen-youth.html

She's a cuter, lower weight version of LibsOfTikTok lady, but OP overestimates how many people in MoCo think homely Jews are physically or politically attractive.

She's a convert to Judaism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
She's a famous right winger
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethany_Mandel

She wrote a book called "woke", went on TV to promote it, and couldn't define the term.

https://slate.com/news-and-politic
s/2023/03/bethany-mandel-define-woke-video-stolen-youth.html

She's a cuter, lower weight version of LibsOfTikTok lady, but OP overestimates how many people in MoCo think homely Jews are physically or politically attractive.

She's a convert to Judaism.

So, forgive her disconnected attraction to Neo-Nazis?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have no idea who this person is, but OP is heavy on name calling and accusations, written extremely emotionally, and is light on evidence. Very unconvincing and makes me immediately assume many of these quotes and claims are made in bad faith.

Then why don’t you take the time to educate yourself about her rather than making a super pointless comment on DCUM?

I think if you're trying to convince people of something but you come across as a little deranged, it's useful to get feedback on it so you can do a better job in the future. But if the goal of the post was not to be convincing but rather to scream into the void, I agree with you that my comment was pointless.

A bit of sanity in this otherwise insane thread.

I agree that not having kids in public school should disqualify her. The rest of it comes off as unhinged.

And I'm generally leaning right, and I don't send my kids to PS either, but it seems very basic to require a child in the system to be on the board.

Most members do not have children currently in the system, but at least they had children who have since graduated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have no idea who this person is, but OP is heavy on name calling and accusations, written extremely emotionally, and is light on evidence. Very unconvincing and makes me immediately assume many of these quotes and claims are made in bad faith.

Then why don’t you take the time to educate yourself about her rather than making a super pointless comment on DCUM?

I think if you're trying to convince people of something but you come across as a little deranged, it's useful to get feedback on it so you can do a better job in the future. But if the goal of the post was not to be convincing but rather to scream into the void, I agree with you that my comment was pointless.

A bit of sanity in this otherwise insane thread.

I agree that not having kids in public school should disqualify her. The rest of it comes off as unhinged.

And I'm generally leaning right, and I don't send my kids to PS either, but it seems very basic to require a child in the system to be on the board.

I'm afraid I have to disagree as do our laws. She has every right to serve the public and improve schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have no idea who this person is, but OP is heavy on name calling and accusations, written extremely emotionally, and is light on evidence. Very unconvincing and makes me immediately assume many of these quotes and claims are made in bad faith.

Then why don’t you take the time to educate yourself about her rather than making a super pointless comment on DCUM?

I think if you're trying to convince people of something but you come across as a little deranged, it's useful to get feedback on it so you can do a better job in the future. But if the goal of the post was not to be convincing but rather to scream into the void, I agree with you that my comment was pointless.

A bit of sanity in this otherwise insane thread.

I agree that not having kids in public school should disqualify her. The rest of it comes off as unhinged.

And I'm generally leaning right, and I don't send my kids to PS either, but it seems very basic to require a child in the system to be on the board.

I'm afraid I have to disagree as do our laws. She has every right to serve the public and improve schools.

Nope. She has every right to be a candidate for Board of Education. Then the voters will decide.