The RWNJ you’re going back and forth with is too far gone (or too well paid). All the proof in the world can’t convince someone whose sense of self is bound up in his victimhood like his is. |
Trump, Ginni, Giuliani, Mark Meadows, Gym Jordan… they were all pretty open about what they were planning. Not a single “antifa” has been named. “Fa” is amply represented though. |
Use of this term is a telltale sign that you are probably in a bubble. So far gone, indeed. |
Perhaps if you badger the meaning of the words "insurrection" or "coup" to fit your warped worldview. You likely have no problem badgering words though, so par for the course. |
They won't because they either don't have evidence and just "know" it - as if that is supposed to be in any way coherent or credible, or the only so-called evidence they have is from some freakazoid conspiracy rag that has zero track record for truthfulness. |
Prove the bubble wrong. Prove that you aren't a nutjob. Give us credible citations of some big deep state antifa scheme. |
Yeah, because spy agencies, who regularly conduct information warfare through MSM, are going to tell on themselves through the same MSM ![]() ![]() What other J6ers got 60 minutes puff piece interviews? See how it goes? |
You are completely missing the point. The whole invocation of J6 is a non-sequitur anyway. As if differing degrees of a particular behavior negates the existence of the same behavior for the other side. No; not how it works. |
Oh so now the "spy agencies" are involved? Are you seriously trying to claim the CIA was involved in J6? And again, without you having even a single shred of credible evidence to prove it? You just keep showing yourself to be nuttier and nuttier. The exercise was to prove that you are NOT a right wing nutjob. But instead you've only confirmed it. |
1984 is really instructive in terms of mind control concepts. You have to say that 2+2=5 because The Party defines truth. Truth doesn't exist independently, it is created and defined by The Party. You hear very similar things these days (example: "the science" during covid was political science, not actual science, and compliance was considered a moral obligation). |
No, that is not the exercise. Stop taking the thread off topic. If you want to create another "insurrection" thread, go for it. |
It's funny because many posters in this thread can't even see it in themselves. SMH. |
Which other coup participants became the target of right wing conspiracies? He’s suing Fox, you know. That kind of thing tends to attract media. |
Not at all missing the point. J6 is a perfect illustration. There's position A, that Trump got right wingers riled up with his lies that the election was stolen from him, along with floating the crazy idea that they result of Trump's loss could be overturned, and they stormed the Capitol as a result. There's probably a literal million data points that point to this. And then there's position B, that none of that happened, that instead somehow it was all a false flag by the "deep state" and anarchocommunists designed to make Trump and the right wing look bad. And, there's hardly any evidence at all to support this, and what little weak nonsense they have to point at, has either been repeatedly debunked, has been twisted and contorted beyond recognition (such as Epps), or was outright fabricated and circulated on social media. |
Yup, still missing the point. And keying on incident as if it is determinative of the entire phenomenon. Next you are going to tell me it was actually Republicans who initiated the "Defund the Police" mantra :roll: . You are lost in the sauce, my friend. |