The people you are lying to know what you are talking about. Not one of the contests you mentioned has problems to solve at a rate of faster than 1minute/problem, except for Math counts countdown round which is specifically designed to be exciting to watch, where the winning students GUESS the one-word answers before thinking, by voice without writing, and get many incorrect. So unless your student is guessing answers (not proofs!) on their homework, they aren't doing the problems in under a minute each. If I'm wrong, your kid could make some pizza money with an entertaining niche streaming channel on Twitch. Mathcounts regular rounds are 40 minutes for 30 problems and 6 minutes for 2 problems, and even the winners are not expected to solve all of them correctly. ARML Individual is 10 minutes per 2 questions. (Relay round is 1-2 minutes per question, as a special speed round.) AMC is 70 minutes for 25 questions. AIME is 15 minutes per question. None of the above require proofs or showing any work at all. JMO is 90 minutes per question. Please tell us what your 8th grader did that was "above JMO". Furthermore, all on these are tests are material that students learned a year before and thoroughly studied and practiced, not the first day of seeing new material. |
Is there more than one female precalculus teacher? The one we met at BTSN seemed pretty good. |
maybe some but mostly trolls |
|
Hi, this is my first time posting on this website ever so I'm sorry if I accidentally replied to the wrong post or whatever. I'm currently a junior who went through the Functions-->Analysis 1A/B pipeline, and now am currently in Analysis 2A/B. I went to TPMS and I was on their varsity mathcounts team for all three years, though I quit any form of competitive math when I got into high school.
My personal experience was that the first quarter of Functions was (probably purposely) more difficult than the rest of the quarters; this weeded out a few of my friends who ended up dropping out to normal precalc. The homework in the beginning was much longer than it was for the rest of the year; However it should not be taking multiple hours... First couple of weeks,, yes you get 10 page packets. For the rest of the year, it looks more like 5-6 pages, one hour of work. I would not worry too much. I believe kids get auto-kicked from the class anyway if they have a <80% by first quarter. |
| Thank you PP. Can you tell us what the homework load looks like for Analysis 1 A/B? |
The Blair pre-calc teacher this year is the same one my kid had last year for Algebra 2. My kid is doing ok but only because they go up and ask her to explain things individually. She doesn’t really help the whole class to understand… 🫤 |
There are a few dozen students enrolled at most - and yet nearly 3000 views of this thread. About 100 entries. Of course it is mostly trolls. There aren't 3000 parents to this handful of students. Troll troll troll troll troll |
| The kids had to decide whether to drop by Friday. Is your child continuing? |
Last Friday or this Friday? |
My 9th grader concurs that she is not a good teacher. And that the other kids agree. Strange since the other magnet teachers seem fantastic and this likely will have impact on how the kids start off feeling about math. |
I'm so relieved to see people talking about it on here, I thought it was just my kid making excuses. They are struggling and they keep saying that the teacher doesn't really teach. They've always had As in math at TPMS and they have a C right now. |
Is it possible she's expecting kids to teach themselves at this level? Is there a book? |
If the kids are expectrd to teach themselves, they should split the money through teacher is getting, and the teacher should only get sub money for running study hall. |
Yes, and this won't be the last time either. This style of teaching will come up in all the other magnet math classes your child will take. |
No there isn’t a book. There are a lot of lengthy problem sets as homework where they work out how to do it, eventually, but not speedily. |