2023 Boys Private School Results /Game Schedules/ Commentary

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Results from Yesterday:

STA: 13, Good Counsel: 9



Game was much closer than the final score suggests. GC down by one at the half (6-5). Both teams played fairly equal.......equally bad. STA looks worse than last year and will have a rough time in the IAC again this year.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Results from Yesterday:

STA: 13, Good Counsel: 9



Game was much closer than the final score suggests. GC down by one at the half (6-5). Both teams played fairly equal.......equally bad. STA looks worse than last year and will have a rough time in the IAC again this year.


GC isn’t good. If that was a competitive game STA isn’t good either. No need to watch.
Anonymous
Madlax needs to stick to a top 5 or 10. No need to rank any further than that.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Madlax needs to stick to a top 5 or 10. No need to rank any further than that.


I think a top 10 is fine.

Anonymous
Does anyone know if GZ McD game will be shown live on any platform?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Results from Yesterday:

STA: 13, Good Counsel: 9



Game was much closer than the final score suggests. GC down by one at the half (6-5). Both teams played fairly equal.......equally bad. STA looks worse than last year and will have a rough time in the IAC again this year.


GC isn’t good. If that was a competitive game STA isn’t good either. No need to watch.


Don't be a dick. STA has a few individual talented players... their LSM is a beast!

Didn't STA play SJC in a scrimmage and it was very competitive for 3 quarters?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Results from Yesterday:

STA: 13, Good Counsel: 9



Game was much closer than the final score suggests. GC down by one at the half (6-5). Both teams played fairly equal.......equally bad. STA looks worse than last year and will have a rough time in the IAC again this year.


GC isn’t good. If that was a competitive game STA isn’t good either. No need to watch.


Don't be a dick. STA has a few individual talented players... their LSM is a beast!

Didn't STA play SJC in a scrimmage and it was very competitive for 3 quarters?


NP. Nice language STA booster. Scrimmages don't count and SJC would destroy STA based on this weeks play level. STA lost to Severn this week pretty badly, so not a good start to the season. Yesterday, STA's UPenn LSM did not do much, besides fall down a few times. He certainly did not play like a "beast". Also, their UPenn fogo had a ton of errors. Not an impressive showing for STA, to say the least.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Results from Yesterday:

STA: 13, Good Counsel: 9



Game was much closer than the final score suggests. GC down by one at the half (6-5). Both teams played fairly equal.......equally bad. STA looks worse than last year and will have a rough time in the IAC again this year.


GC isn’t good. If that was a competitive game STA isn’t good either. No need to watch.


Even less impressive for GC

Don't be a dick. STA has a few individual talented players... their LSM is a beast!

Didn't STA play SJC in a scrimmage and it was very competitive for 3 quarters?


NP. Nice language STA booster. Scrimmages don't count and SJC would destroy STA based on this weeks play level. STA lost to Severn this week pretty badly, so not a good start to the season. Yesterday, STA's UPenn LSM did not do much, besides fall down a few times. He certainly did not play like a "beast". Also, their UPenn fogo had a ton of errors. Not an impressive showing for STA, to say the least.
Anonymous
NP. Nice language STA booster. Scrimmages don't count and SJC would destroy STA based on this weeks play level. STA lost to Severn this week pretty badly, so not a good start to the season. Yesterday, STA's UPenn LSM did not do much, besides fall down a few times. He certainly did not play like a "beast". Also, their UPenn fogo had a ton of errors. Not an impressive showing for STA, to say the least.


Another NP who does not have a kid on this team. What kind of adult calls out specific kids and ridicules them? You are the kind that gives so many "lax bro" dads their very deserved reputation of never growing up. I would be ashamed to have you as my spouse or - worse - parent.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Results from Yesterday:

STA: 13, Good Counsel: 9



Game was much closer than the final score suggests. GC down by one at the half (6-5). Both teams played fairly equal.......equally bad. STA looks worse than last year and will have a rough time in the IAC again this year.


GC isn’t good. If that was a competitive game STA isn’t good either. No need to watch.


Don't be a dick. STA has a few individual talented players... their LSM is a beast!

Didn't STA play SJC in a scrimmage and it was very competitive for 3 quarters?


NP. Nice language STA booster. Scrimmages don't count and SJC would destroy STA based on this weeks play level. STA lost to Severn this week pretty badly, so not a good start to the season. Yesterday, STA's UPenn LSM did not do much, besides fall down a few times. He certainly did not play like a "beast". Also, their UPenn fogo had a ton of errors. Not an impressive showing for STA, to say the least.


Interesting u paid close attention to a game your son wasnt in
Anonymous
For those interested, the McDonogh - Gonzaga game will be streamed live this evening, faceoff is at 6 PM. Link is below, should be a great game.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUezamubpsQ
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:For those interested, the McDonogh - Gonzaga game will be streamed live this evening, faceoff is at 6 PM. Link is below, should be a great game.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUezamubpsQ


Oh, but you better not watch it if you don’t have a son on the field! 🙄😂
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
NP. Nice language STA booster. Scrimmages don't count and SJC would destroy STA based on this weeks play level. STA lost to Severn this week pretty badly, so not a good start to the season. Yesterday, STA's UPenn LSM did not do much, besides fall down a few times. He certainly did not play like a "beast". Also, their UPenn fogo had a ton of errors. Not an impressive showing for STA, to say the least.


Another NP who does not have a kid on this team. What kind of adult calls out specific kids and ridicules them? You are the kind that gives so many "lax bro" dads their very deserved reputation of never growing up. I would be ashamed to have you as my spouse or - worse - parent.


Umm….first of all, there were two teams on the field, in case you didn’t know. Secondly, have you ever read DCUM before? Facts are reported all the time and the comments above are facts. Fogo had errors and LSM didn’t play like a “beast”, as someone suggested. Any scouting coach would denote the exact same thing. STA boosters can dish it out, but they just can’t take it. Do you know how many times a week people talk about other schools’ players. I can’t tell you how many times I have read that so and so is a hold back or a double hold back or has played for too many high schools in the same league or a kid transfers because of poor grades, or a kid is out of shape, or a kid lives with a coach, or a kid didn’t deserve a certain college commitment, etc, etc. The list goes on and on. The pps’ comments were factual about player’s performance in the game, not rumor, hearsay, or lies about a player.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Results from Yesterday:

STA: 13, Good Counsel: 9



Game was much closer than the final score suggests. GC down by one at the half (6-5). Both teams played fairly equal.......equally bad. STA looks worse than last year and will have a rough time in the IAC again this year.


GC isn’t good. If that was a competitive game STA isn’t good either. No need to watch.


Don't be a dick. STA has a few individual talented players... their LSM is a beast!

Didn't STA play SJC in a scrimmage and it was very competitive for 3 quarters?


Oh lord. When are people going to stop judging how good they are based on a scrimmage with St. John’s? If they played a real game it would be over after the 1st quarter and the bench would be in full effect.
Anonymous
Game link not
Working
post reply Forum Index » Lacrosse
Message Quick Reply
Go to: