
That's really interesting. Thanks for the insight. I agree with you that the behvior being described gives multiple good reasons to push back against it. |
Yeah it was funny reading the thread seeing so many questions about what kind of culture doesn’t embrace more aunties. I was like the excited kid in class with my hand up waving it around saying, “I know, I know, pick me!” ![]() |
My brother married into a family from a South American country and they all seem to designate all kinds of people as aunties and uncles. My problem with it was I could never figure out how or if a person was related to who and it was very confusing.
I think part of the issue is some cultures are uncomfortable with kids calling adults by their first names so they tell them to call them Auntie Larlita rather than just Larlita. In my family we are totally comfortable with kids calling adults by their first names, even aunts and uncles and grandparents. |
It doesn't matter what or how many cultures embrace the aunt and uncle title for non relatives the point is unless it's her actual child she gets zero say or has zero business trying to manipulate someone else into feeling guilty for making a decision on what they are or aren't allowed to have their child call someone else. |
We are Indian-Americans.
We have specific names for all our relationships - For example, my sister's kids calls me "maasi", my brother's kids will call me "bua", my husband's brother's kid will call me "chaachi" or "taai" and my husband's sister's kid will call me "maami". I am auntie to all kids of my friends. It is a relationship thing rather than an age thing. Similarly, for people who are only several years older than us but not related? We concoct relationships with them that does not even exist to convey intent/respect. I call people older than me (my elder brother or elder sister's friends or their spouses for example - "bhaiya"(elder brother), "didi" (elder sister), "bhaabhi" (elder brother's wife) or Jijaji (elder sister's husband). I just add their name in front of the relationship title. |
I didn’t say that, you did. |
No one said a culture actively frowns on this but keep making up things to make yourself feel better. |
Which is exactly what I said along with giving an example of a culture that was intolerant of giving familial names to non familial relationships. |
Yes. |
OP did, in the first post.
|
It’s the third sentence of the very first post of this thread. |
It depends. I care about my sisters feelings but I am not going to base my personal decisions on my sisters feelings, especially if they don’t really have to do with her. In this case she is deciding that HER child will be calling HET best friend an aunt. I get that you are also an aunt, but it doesn’t really have to do with you. It’s not that she is telling you who your kid should call aunt. Now that would be entirely your business. In this case I think you are overstepping and taking this too personally. Fwiw I think a best friend since age 3 is essentially like a sister. In some ways a friend like this is even closer than a sister. Not in regards to being a relation but likely in terms of sharing intimate feelings and thoughts with. There are also some ways in which a closer biological sibling is closer than a best friend, but I don’t see it as a hierarchy. The are different and both very important relationships. Anyway, let your sister decide how she is going to parent. When it’s your turn you will appreciate it when people respect your parenting choices. |
NP. The OP said “In our culture we are very big on only actual aunts and uncles being called aunt and uncle” so yeah…they’re claiming that it’s frowned upon to call non-aunts and non-uncles Aunt and Uncle. |
No, it’s says that what is culturally done. It does not say frowned upon or condemned in anyway. Just because something may not be common doesn’t mean it is bad. |
I’m sure there are cultures out there that don’t practice calling close friends loved ones. That makes them bad? -np |