The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three

[Anonymous]

They had to have dressed nicer than this for the West Point graduation, no?

[Anonymous]

yall didn't even stop when Mrs. Rubio posted her own pics. Harsh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any predictions for the Trump family at the wedding today? Of course Vanks will be in something wildly inappropriate because she can't stand to not be the center of attention for more than five minutes. Tiffany will be in something perfectly nice that none of us notice because she's the middle child. (Three years from now we will see a pic of her and be like, "This outfit is so cute, where did she wear it? Oh, Don's wedding in 2026.") On the off-chance Melania makes an appearance, she will be in a Gucci mumu, with no indication she is the stepmother of the groom. She will leave after the ceremony.

KG will pull a Taylor Swift and show up in one of her Elvira fits to object.

I think they're going to be matchy. I feel like there's a bridezilla dress code and I can't wait to see what everyone does with it.

The women of the family do love to be color coordinated for events. Remember Tiffany's wedding where they all coordinated perfectly in sequins and pastels for a mothers/sisters photo and then Kim was off to the side in black ruining it? Maybe that's why she and Don didn't work out. Bettina would never screw up a color coordinated moment like that.

Mel looks genuinely happy there, and in the bridal shower pic of Tiffany's someone posted earlier. Maybe Tiffany is the favorite step-dd?

I think Melania really likes children. I also firmly believe Donald consented to one child with her. It doesn't surprise me that she would be a good stepmom to a young Tiffany. She didn't get to have a daughter of her own.

I’d be surprised if he limited her the one. He seems like he likes to have lots of kids because they can all compete for his affection …. It’s not like he puts any work into them, emotional or otherwise. But she was late 30s when she had Barron and if you recall he was off shtupping an adult film star when she was home with the baby so maybe between her age and his general grossness, another baby just wasn’t in the cards. I am also positive her prenup had weight restrictions in it and she might not have wanted to risk not being able to lose the weight again. I will die curious what changes she negotiated in the prenup in order to move to DC — I would guess she got the weight restrictions removed. I have, incidentally, never once seen a picture of her from when Barron was a baby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:yall didn't even stop when Mrs. Rubio posted her own pics. Harsh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Side note, upon googling her to see if she actually dresses like the shit on her shopmy, I really like this dress:

that picture makes her head look absolutely enormous. She really has an unfortunately manly face.

I can't imagine thinking, "I'll put on my paillete minidress and strappy embellished sandals, and add the one accessory this outfit really needs: an intense bracelet stack."

This may he controversial, but am I the only person who finds bracelets stacks dated, heavy, and just uncomfortable looking? In this particular case, why does that outfit need a bracelet stack?

Not just a bracelet stack but a phone wristlet dangling from her arm as well. She lives in Palm Beach where it’s easy to walk into a store and drop 5k on a gorgeous designer dress. But these women reek of poor taste. If I saw her in the wild I’m sure she’d look like a complete unnatural freak. Imagine all these MAGA women sans makeup… In the great words of Countess Luann- money can’t buy you class.

In her defense, I think that's her personal camera? It looks like a casual event.

It most certainly does not look like a casual event and wearing a camera dangling around your wrist with a sequin slip dress and 4 inch heels is tacky tacky tacky. Maybe it’s got a special compartment where she can hold juniors nose candy.

It's not a camera or a wristlet. I think that's someone standing behind her and it looks like hers. She's holding an actual clutch here:

There is no one behind her and you can see the glittery strap around her wrist. If you are a 16 year old girl then I’ll give you a phone wristlet pass. Otherwise, no. Especially at a formal or semi-formal event. I’d think she has been to enough events to know that this amount of tacky doesn’t fly, even with MAGA crowd who take trashy to new levels.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:yall didn't even stop when Mrs. Rubio posted her own pics. Harsh.

Ha ha. I think we could be best friends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Side note, upon googling her to see if she actually dresses like the shit on her shopmy, I really like this dress:

that picture makes her head look absolutely enormous. She really has an unfortunately manly face.

I can't imagine thinking, "I'll put on my paillete minidress and strappy embellished sandals, and add the one accessory this outfit really needs: an intense bracelet stack."

This may he controversial, but am I the only person who finds bracelets stacks dated, heavy, and just uncomfortable looking? In this particular case, why does that outfit need a bracelet stack?

Not just a bracelet stack but a phone wristlet dangling from her arm as well. She lives in Palm Beach where it’s easy to walk into a store and drop 5k on a gorgeous designer dress. But these women reek of poor taste. If I saw her in the wild I’m sure she’d look like a complete unnatural freak. Imagine all these MAGA women sans makeup… In the great words of Countess Luann- money can’t buy you class.

In her defense, I think that's her personal camera? It looks like a casual event.

It most certainly does not look like a casual event and wearing a camera dangling around your wrist with a sequin slip dress and 4 inch heels is tacky tacky tacky. Maybe it’s got a special compartment where she can hold juniors nose candy.

It's not a camera or a wristlet. I think that's someone standing behind her and it looks like hers. She's holding an actual clutch here:

There is no one behind her and you can see the glittery strap around her wrist. If you are a 16 year old girl then I’ll give you a phone wristlet pass. Otherwise, no. Especially at a formal or semi-formal event. I’d think she has been to enough events to know that this amount of tacky doesn’t fly, even with MAGA crowd who take trashy to new levels.

You're oddly worked up about this. The red glittery "strap" is a bracelet, probably for the open bar or something. All attendees had one on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any predictions for the Trump family at the wedding today? Of course Vanks will be in something wildly inappropriate because she can't stand to not be the center of attention for more than five minutes. Tiffany will be in something perfectly nice that none of us notice because she's the middle child. (Three years from now we will see a pic of her and be like, "This outfit is so cute, where did she wear it? Oh, Don's wedding in 2026.") On the off-chance Melania makes an appearance, she will be in a Gucci mumu, with no indication she is the stepmother of the groom. She will leave after the ceremony.

KG will pull a Taylor Swift and show up in one of her Elvira fits to object.

I think they're going to be matchy. I feel like there's a bridezilla dress code and I can't wait to see what everyone does with it.

The women of the family do love to be color coordinated for events. Remember Tiffany's wedding where they all coordinated perfectly in sequins and pastels for a mothers/sisters photo and then Kim was off to the side in black ruining it? Maybe that's why she and Don didn't work out. Bettina would never screw up a color coordinated moment like that.

Mel looks genuinely happy there, and in the bridal shower pic of Tiffany's someone posted earlier. Maybe Tiffany is the favorite step-dd?

I think Melania really likes children. I also firmly believe Donald consented to one child with her. It doesn't surprise me that she would be a good stepmom to a young Tiffany. She didn't get to have a daughter of her own.

I’d be surprised if he limited her the one. He seems like he likes to have lots of kids because they can all compete for his affection …. It’s not like he puts any work into them, emotional or otherwise. But she was late 30s when she had Barron and if you recall he was off shtupping an adult film star when she was home with the baby so maybe between her age and his general grossness, another baby just wasn’t in the cards. I am also positive her prenup had weight restrictions in it and she might not have wanted to risk not being able to lose the weight again. I will die curious what changes she negotiated in the prenup in order to move to DC — I would guess she got the weight restrictions removed. I have, incidentally, never once seen a picture of her from when Barron was a baby.

This comes up every so often and I disagree.

Melania is not a particularly thin woman. She is not fat, but she is not a size 0. She has a postmenopausal mom pooch. I don't think Trump cares about her weight as long as she's not morbidly obese. I doubt he can do much sexually anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Side note, upon googling her to see if she actually dresses like the shit on her shopmy, I really like this dress:

that picture makes her head look absolutely enormous. She really has an unfortunately manly face.

I can't imagine thinking, "I'll put on my paillete minidress and strappy embellished sandals, and add the one accessory this outfit really needs: an intense bracelet stack."

This may he controversial, but am I the only person who finds bracelets stacks dated, heavy, and just uncomfortable looking? In this particular case, why does that outfit need a bracelet stack?

Not just a bracelet stack but a phone wristlet dangling from her arm as well. She lives in Palm Beach where it’s easy to walk into a store and drop 5k on a gorgeous designer dress. But these women reek of poor taste. If I saw her in the wild I’m sure she’d look like a complete unnatural freak. Imagine all these MAGA women sans makeup… In the great words of Countess Luann- money can’t buy you class.

In her defense, I think that's her personal camera? It looks like a casual event.

It most certainly does not look like a casual event and wearing a camera dangling around your wrist with a sequin slip dress and 4 inch heels is tacky tacky tacky. Maybe it’s got a special compartment where she can hold juniors nose candy.

It's not a camera or a wristlet. I think that's someone standing behind her and it looks like hers. She's holding an actual clutch here:

There is no one behind her and you can see the glittery strap around her wrist. If you are a 16 year old girl then I’ll give you a phone wristlet pass. Otherwise, no. Especially at a formal or semi-formal event. I’d think she has been to enough events to know that this amount of tacky doesn’t fly, even with MAGA crowd who take trashy to new levels.

You're oddly worked up about this. The red glittery "strap" is a bracelet, probably for the open bar or something. All attendees had one on.





It’s not a red glittery strap. It is a silver strap. Is it that hard for you to believe that she is that tacky? Are you a secret cell phone, wristlet lover? Put your bifocals on and look a little more closely.

[Anonymous]

Oh be nice and let’s not post pics of a sex pest on here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh be nice and let’s not post pics of a sex pest on here.

It's a thread dedicated to the wife and daughters of the biggest sex pest of all!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Side note, upon googling her to see if she actually dresses like the shit on her shopmy, I really like this dress:

that picture makes her head look absolutely enormous. She really has an unfortunately manly face.

I can't imagine thinking, "I'll put on my paillete minidress and strappy embellished sandals, and add the one accessory this outfit really needs: an intense bracelet stack."

This may he controversial, but am I the only person who finds bracelets stacks dated, heavy, and just uncomfortable looking? In this particular case, why does that outfit need a bracelet stack?

Not just a bracelet stack but a phone wristlet dangling from her arm as well. She lives in Palm Beach where it’s easy to walk into a store and drop 5k on a gorgeous designer dress. But these women reek of poor taste. If I saw her in the wild I’m sure she’d look like a complete unnatural freak. Imagine all these MAGA women sans makeup… In the great words of Countess Luann- money can’t buy you class.

In her defense, I think that's her personal camera? It looks like a casual event.

It most certainly does not look like a casual event and wearing a camera dangling around your wrist with a sequin slip dress and 4 inch heels is tacky tacky tacky. Maybe it’s got a special compartment where she can hold juniors nose candy.

It's not a camera or a wristlet. I think that's someone standing behind her and it looks like hers. She's holding an actual clutch here:

There is no one behind her and you can see the glittery strap around her wrist. If you are a 16 year old girl then I’ll give you a phone wristlet pass. Otherwise, no. Especially at a formal or semi-formal event. I’d think she has been to enough events to know that this amount of tacky doesn’t fly, even with MAGA crowd who take trashy to new levels.

You're oddly worked up about this. The red glittery "strap" is a bracelet, probably for the open bar or something. All attendees had one on.

Yes, it makes total sense for the admission or open bar bracelet at an Amfar fundraiser to be a red ribbon. But PP was talking about the silver strap on her other wrist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I know we hate posting Rem, but she is the only person who covers Jeanette Rubio frequently and Jeanette just had two killer looks on a diplomatic visit to India:

I have to disagree here. The blazer over a dress like this is a weird combo, and although she looks fabulous in the gold lamé gown it’s too sexy for a diplomatic reception.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any predictions for the Trump family at the wedding today? Of course Vanks will be in something wildly inappropriate because she can't stand to not be the center of attention for more than five minutes. Tiffany will be in something perfectly nice that none of us notice because she's the middle child. (Three years from now we will see a pic of her and be like, "This outfit is so cute, where did she wear it? Oh, Don's wedding in 2026.") On the off-chance Melania makes an appearance, she will be in a Gucci mumu, with no indication she is the stepmother of the groom. She will leave after the ceremony.

KG will pull a Taylor Swift and show up in one of her Elvira fits to object.

I think they're going to be matchy. I feel like there's a bridezilla dress code and I can't wait to see what everyone does with it.

The women of the family do love to be color coordinated for events. Remember Tiffany's wedding where they all coordinated perfectly in sequins and pastels for a mothers/sisters photo and then Kim was off to the side in black ruining it? Maybe that's why she and Don didn't work out. Bettina would never screw up a color coordinated moment like that.

I'm actually lol because I have only ever seen this photo before with Kimberly cropped out!

KG was placed on an end intentionally.

[Anonymous]

We got our first pic of a Trump woman at the wedding! Via, who else, our girl Rem: