IRS Whistleblowers and Devon Archer - House Oversight

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just remember tgat the owner of Burisma had his assets seized in Ukraine. During the next week VP Biden calls the President of Ukraine four times to demand that the prosecutor be fired.

The person they pick as the new prosecutor had no legal experience and was previously in prison for corruption. The new prosecutor settles the criminal cases against Burisma for a fine.

The new prosecutor is soon sanctioned and arrested for corruption again. Everything else is spin or a lie.

Everything you said is false and has been proven so repeatedly over the past 4 years. You guys are so full of shit about everything.

Really? His name is Yuriy Lutesnko and this is from his wiki page:

In 2010, Lutsenko was charged with abuse of office and forgery by Prosecutor General of Ukraine Viktor Pshonka, in what was widely viewed as political retaliation for having investigated one of Yanukovych's cabinet members four years earlier. In 2012, he was sentenced to four years in prison, but was pardoned by Yanukovych.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just remember tgat the owner of Burisma had his assets seized in Ukraine. During the next week VP Biden calls the President of Ukraine four times to demand that the prosecutor be fired.

The person they pick as the new prosecutor had no legal experience and was previously in prison for corruption. The new prosecutor settles the criminal cases against Burisma for a fine.

The new prosecutor is soon sanctioned and arrested for corruption again. Everything else is spin or a lie.

Everything you said is false and has been proven so repeatedly over the past 4 years. You guys are so full of shit about everything.

Really? His name is Yuriy Lutesnko and this is from his wiki page:

In 2010, Lutsenko was charged with abuse of office and forgery by Prosecutor General of Ukraine Viktor Pshonka, in what was widely viewed as political retaliation for having investigated one of Yanukovych's cabinet members four years earlier. In 2012, he was sentenced to four years in prison, but was pardoned by Yanukovych.

So the way you described him was not true. He did have experience and his previous conviction was political retaliation by Yanukovych, the corrupt Pro-Russian stooge that corrupt Paul Manafort worked for. You keep citing the corrupt bad guys instead of the good guys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Biden filed and paid late. So why then do people keep saying he didn't pay?

His friend paid for him and he was given "heads up" on some of the investigation.

Go on vacation like all the congressional maga did. This is over. All the RWJNs in congress have given up on this.

Speaking of vacation, Victor Shokin wants to come to the US and testify against Biden but guess who wont give him a visa?

Shokin is full of crap. He's just desperate to claw his way back out of the hole he dug for himself, so he's peddling fictions in the hopes that someone's buying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left-tards are quick to ignore the facts while pushing a narrative of attacks against credible witnesses. The evidence of the corrupt Biden Crime family is overwhelming added and abetted by 44.

Meanwhile if heresay about the leading GOP is mentioned... lock him up!

You're what's known as a low information voter. It's not that it's good or bad, it just is...and it's something that Trump counts on. I'm sure that he appreciates that.

PP - When you cant attack the message and rather attack the messenger is the epitome of low information.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left-tards are quick to ignore the facts while pushing a narrative of attacks against credible witnesses. The evidence of the corrupt Biden Crime family is overwhelming added and abetted by 44.

Meanwhile if heresay about the leading GOP is mentioned... lock him up!

You're what's known as a low information voter. It's not that it's good or bad, it just is...and it's something that Trump counts on. I'm sure that he appreciates that.

PP - When you cant attack the message and rather attack the messenger is the epitome of low information.

Well, it is true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This gentleman got a year in jail for the same crime as Hunter

According to his plea agreement, De Sousa was employed by the Baltimore Police Department beginning in 1998. De Sousa announced his resignation from BPD on May 15, 2018. On June 10, 1999, De Sousa submitted an Employee’s Withholding Exemption Certificate (W-4) to the City of Baltimore falsely claiming nine allowances for both federal and state tax purposes. By virtue of this claim, De Sousa substantially reduced the amount of taxes withheld from his salary each year. When he filed his federal and state income taxes for calendar years 2008 through 2012, he falsely claimed deductions to which he was not entitled, including for unreimbursed employee expenses when he had no such expenses, mortgage interest deductions and deductions for local property taxes when he did not have a mortgage or own any real property, and business losses when he did not operate any businesses. By virtue of these improper deductions, De Sousa fraudulently reduced the amount of taxes he owed to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the State of Maryland.

De Sousa admitted that for calendar years 2011 and 2012, he did not file tax returns at all and did not do so until 2014. When he did file returns for those years he falsely claimed unreimbursed employee expenses and donations to charity. De Sousa also failed to pay penalties and interest on those late-filed returns despite having been told to do so by the IRS. In addition, as of May 5, 2018, De Sousa had not filed taxes for 2013, 2014, or 2015, despite knowing that he had a legal obligation to do so. By virtue of the nine allowances he falsely claimed, De Sousa also owed additional money to the United States and the State of Maryland in each of those years, as he also knew

https://www.justice.gov/usao-md/pr/former-baltimore-police-commissioner-darryl-de-sousa-sentenced-federal-prison-failing

Vs
According to the tax Information, Hunter Biden received taxable income in excess of $1,500,000 annually in calendar years 2017 and 2018. Despite owing in excess of $100,000 in federal income taxes each year, he did not pay the income tax due for either year. Biden has paid his back tax with penalties and interest.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-de/pr/tax-and-firearm-charges-filed-against-robert-hunter-biden

Biden filed and paid late. So why then do people keep saying he didn't pay?

And it's weird that the same people who are up in arms over Hunter Biden and are insisting he must go to jail had no problem with Trump lying on his taxes, not paying, delaying and so on.

Nope.
Not all of it. He still owes for 2014, but the DOJ conveniently let the statute of limitations expire for that.
And, according to Shapley, who should know, he owed more than he paid for 2017 and 2018.

And, let's be clear - Hunter didn't pay. Kevin Morris paid for him.

Too bad De Sousa didn't have rich friends to help him out.

https://nypost.com/2023/06/28/hunter-biden-prosecutor-made-obstruction-crystal-clear-whistleblower/

[Anonymous]

Hunter Biden was selling access to his dad.
His dad gave the access--which is proven by these phone calls. And, he knew that his son was being paid for that.
That is enough.

The prosecutor may have deserved to be fired--but the timing of it and payments to Hunter leave a lot of questions unanswered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hunter Biden was selling access to his dad.
His dad gave the access--which is proven by these phone calls. And, he knew that his son was being paid for that.
That is enough.

The prosecutor may have deserved to be fired--but the timing of it and payments to Hunter leave a lot of questions unanswered.

You don’t know any of the facts. Shokin was fired by the Ukrainian parliament months later after Christine Lagarde, head of the IMF, made it a nonnegotiable condition of continued IMF financing. It had nothing to do with Burisma and Biden wasn’t going rogue in making the demand. Firing corrupt Shokin was a unanimous demand from every Western lender and investor in Ukraine. Stop beating this dead horse. It isn’t going to run.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hunter Biden was selling access to his dad.
His dad gave the access--which is proven by these phone calls. And, he knew that his son was being paid for that.
That is enough.

The prosecutor may have deserved to be fired--but the timing of it and payments to Hunter leave a lot of questions unanswered.

P.s. If Hunter was only selling 'illusion of access" as Goldman alleges, it does not matter. His dad assisted him with this by taking multiple phone calls with his business associates. He knew Hunter was being paid by these people. That is enough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hunter Biden was selling access to his dad.
His dad gave the access--which is proven by these phone calls. And, he knew that his son was being paid for that.
That is enough.

The prosecutor may have deserved to be fired--but the timing of it and payments to Hunter leave a lot of questions unanswered.

P.s. If Hunter was only selling 'illusion of access" as Goldman alleges, it does not matter. His dad assisted him with this by taking multiple phone calls with his business associates. He knew Hunter was being paid by these people. That is enough.

That's enough for what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hunter Biden was selling access to his dad.
His dad gave the access--which is proven by these phone calls. And, he knew that his son was being paid for that.
That is enough.

The prosecutor may have deserved to be fired--but the timing of it and payments to Hunter leave a lot of questions unanswered.

P.s. If Hunter was only selling 'illusion of access" as Goldman alleges, it does not matter. His dad assisted him with this by taking multiple phone calls with his business associates. He knew Hunter was being paid by these people. That is enough.

That's enough for what?

To have been criminal. Helping family member collect money for "illusion of access."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hunter Biden was selling access to his dad.
His dad gave the access--which is proven by these phone calls. And, he knew that his son was being paid for that.
That is enough.

The prosecutor may have deserved to be fired--but the timing of it and payments to Hunter leave a lot of questions unanswered.

P.s. If Hunter was only selling 'illusion of access" as Goldman alleges, it does not matter. His dad assisted him with this by taking multiple phone calls with his business associates. He knew Hunter was being paid by these people. That is enough.

That's enough for what?

To have been criminal. Helping family member collect money for "illusion of access."

Let's see somebody formally bring a case then. As you've seen with respect to how difficult it is to bring a career criminal like Trump to justice, there is a LONG way from here to there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hunter Biden was selling access to his dad.
His dad gave the access--which is proven by these phone calls. And, he knew that his son was being paid for that.
That is enough.

The prosecutor may have deserved to be fired--but the timing of it and payments to Hunter leave a lot of questions unanswered.

P.s. If Hunter was only selling 'illusion of access" as Goldman alleges, it does not matter. His dad assisted him with this by taking multiple phone calls with his business associates. He knew Hunter was being paid by these people. That is enough.

That’s 100% wrong. Politicians take phone calls and meetings with everyone, it’s literally most of what they do. Biden is famous for calling and taking phone calls with everybody and their mother. If Mitch McConnell called him during a meeting, he would take the call and talk to everyone in the room. It doesn’t mean he will do anything inappropriate for any of them.

According to your SCOTUS in the McDonnell case, there is no crime without a tangible quid pro quo. McDonnell took bribes and made phone calls and set up meetings but the state did not do what the briber requested, so SCOTUS overturned the conviction. Biden didn’t do any of that. Even Ron Johnson admitted in the Senate report that there is no evidence that Joe personally received anything from Burisma and no evidence that he did anything inappropriate for Burisma. You have nothing. It’s a dead horse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hunter Biden was selling access to his dad.
His dad gave the access--which is proven by these phone calls. And, he knew that his son was being paid for that.
That is enough.

The prosecutor may have deserved to be fired--but the timing of it and payments to Hunter leave a lot of questions unanswered.

P.s. If Hunter was only selling 'illusion of access" as Goldman alleges, it does not matter. His dad assisted him with this by taking multiple phone calls with his business associates. He knew Hunter was being paid by these people. That is enough.

That’s 100% wrong. Politicians take phone calls and meetings with everyone, it’s literally most of what they do. Biden is famous for calling and taking phone calls with everybody and their mother. If Mitch McConnell called him during a meeting, he would take the call and talk to everyone in the room. It doesn’t mean he will do anything inappropriate for any of them.

According to your SCOTUS in the McDonnell case, there is no crime without a tangible quid pro quo. McDonnell took bribes and made phone calls and set up meetings but the state did not do what the briber requested, so SCOTUS overturned the conviction. Biden didn’t do any of that. Even Ron Johnson admitted in the Senate report that there is no evidence that Joe personally received anything from Burisma and no evidence that he did anything inappropriate for Burisma. You have nothing. It’s a dead horse.

Quid pro quo: millions and millions for his family members-

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The left-tards are quick to ignore the facts while pushing a narrative of attacks against credible witnesses. The evidence of the corrupt Biden Crime family is overwhelming added and abetted by 44.

Meanwhile if heresay about the leading GOP is mentioned... lock him up!

+1

DP - what crimes have the "Biden Crime Family" committed?

The democrats are correct, no evidence of crimes of bribery...

Outside of the bank records, the suspicious activity reports, the wire transfers, the Privat bank transactions, the LLCs, the texts, the emails, the WhatsApp messages, the photos of Joe with Hunter’s business partners, the voicemails to his son, the two business partners saying Joe is the “brand,” the “big guy,” and “the chairman,” the two whistleblowers testimony, the recorded phone calls between Biden and Poroshenko, the video of Joe Biden bragging about firing the Ukrainian prosecutor, and Hunter’s statements that he’s giving his dad half his income, there is NO evidence of Joe Biden being involved in a crime of bribery.

Innuendo and speculation based on intentional misinformation about normal business relationships and transactions. That’s all you have.

And yet that seems to be enough for some prosecutors as well.... These cases are being "tried" in the court of public opinion, long before a courtroom jury ever gets to decide them. The only "jury" that matters right now are the voters.