Idaho Murder Suspect Bryan Kohberger - arrest warrant affadavit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:55 pages and I'd be curious to know how many of these posts are placing the blame squarely where it belongs (with the suspect) and how many are faulting the residents of the house.

Why do people keep saying this is victim blaming? They are NOT to blame. Having conversations about ways to reduce your risks of bad things happening is not blaming. It does not mean you deserve what happens.

I don't walk through dark alleys alone at night. Is it my fault if I'm robbed or killed? Of course not! But there are steps I can take to reduce the risk of a bad outcome so that hopefully I don't become a victim.

If he was stalking at least one of these girls chances are no matter what they did it wouldn't matter. BUT as a general principle I still lock my door when I leave my house. I don't deserve to be robbed and am not to blame if some breaks in, but I can reduce that risk.

Having conversations about ways to reduce your risks IN THIS THREAD implies that the people in the home could have done something (locked doors, called the police immediately, lived on campus, not partied, not had public Insta accounts, installed security if they were aware they had a stalker) to prevent this from happening.

That's why.

You aren't good at nuance. Victim blaming is literally saying "it's their fault they were murdered." Nobody has said that here. Nobody.

The nuance you're missing is this: in discussions about this crime, people are asking why they wouldn't have locked their doors, why the survivor didn't call the police, etc. Posters are discussing the household dynamics as a way of answering those questions. These discussions are a way to make sense of things.

These discussions will most likely get young people to start locking their doors. Maybe it will get roommates to communicate with each other about houseguests.

Of course. All those college students browsing DCUM for safety tips. Hugely helpful.

Well, as you know, there are MANY DCUM parents here who take a very active part in their children's college applications, choices, and college life. Perhaps they will include safety tips as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:55 pages and I'd be curious to know how many of these posts are placing the blame squarely where it belongs (with the suspect) and how many are faulting the residents of the house.

Why do people keep saying this is victim blaming? They are NOT to blame. Having conversations about ways to reduce your risks of bad things happening is not blaming. It does not mean you deserve what happens.

I don't walk through dark alleys alone at night. Is it my fault if I'm robbed or killed? Of course not! But there are steps I can take to reduce the risk of a bad outcome so that hopefully I don't become a victim.

If he was stalking at least one of these girls chances are no matter what they did it wouldn't matter. BUT as a general principle I still lock my door when I leave my house. I don't deserve to be robbed and am not to blame if some breaks in, but I can reduce that risk.

Having conversations about ways to reduce your risks IN THIS THREAD implies that the people in the home could have done something (locked doors, called the police immediately, lived on campus, not partied, not had public Insta accounts, installed security if they were aware they had a stalker) to prevent this from happening.

That's why.

You aren't good at nuance. Victim blaming is literally saying "it's their fault they were murdered." Nobody has said that here. Nobody.

The nuance you're missing is this: in discussions about this crime, people are asking why they wouldn't have locked their doors, why the survivor didn't call the police, etc. Posters are discussing the household dynamics as a way of answering those questions. These discussions are a way to make sense of things.

These discussions will most likely get young people to start locking their doors. Maybe it will get roommates to communicate with each other about houseguests.

Of course. All those college students browsing DCUM for safety tips. Hugely helpful.

Well, as you know, there are MANY DCUM parents here who take a very active part in their children's college applications, choices, and college life. Perhaps they will include safety tips as well.

Like don't have Instagram? And don't go anywhere that a killer might meet you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am wondering how close does a person have to be to a home for their cell phone to "ping" off that address?

On 20/20 last week, they said his cell phone connected with the houses Wi-Fi a few times. So pretty close.

How does that work? Did he connect to use their wifi? Or did their wifi somehow track his phone tried to connect? It’s creepy to think our phones are leaving trails in the houses of strangers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:55 pages and I'd be curious to know how many of these posts are placing the blame squarely where it belongs (with the suspect) and how many are faulting the residents of the house.

Why do people keep saying this is victim blaming? They are NOT to blame. Having conversations about ways to reduce your risks of bad things happening is not blaming. It does not mean you deserve what happens.

I don't walk through dark alleys alone at night. Is it my fault if I'm robbed or killed? Of course not! But there are steps I can take to reduce the risk of a bad outcome so that hopefully I don't become a victim.

If he was stalking at least one of these girls chances are no matter what they did it wouldn't matter. BUT as a general principle I still lock my door when I leave my house. I don't deserve to be robbed and am not to blame if some breaks in, but I can reduce that risk.

Having conversations about ways to reduce your risks IN THIS THREAD implies that the people in the home could have done something (locked doors, called the police immediately, lived on campus, not partied, not had public Insta accounts, installed security if they were aware they had a stalker) to prevent this from happening.

That's why.

You aren't good at nuance. Victim blaming is literally saying "it's their fault they were murdered." Nobody has said that here. Nobody.

The nuance you're missing is this: in discussions about this crime, people are asking why they wouldn't have locked their doors, why the survivor didn't call the police, etc. Posters are discussing the household dynamics as a way of answering those questions. These discussions are a way to make sense of things.

These discussions will most likely get young people to start locking their doors. Maybe it will get roommates to communicate with each other about houseguests.

Of course. All those college students browsing DCUM for safety tips. Hugely helpful.

Are you under the impression that DCUM is the only place this is being discussed? Eye roll indeed.

[Anonymous]

This is horrific - BK twice dined at the restaurant where two of his victims worked, and followed all three girls on Insta:


https://www.ibtimes.sg/idaho-murder-suspect-brian-kohberger-twice-dined-restaurant-where-2-female-victims-worked-68695

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is horrific - BK twice dined at the restaurant where two of his victims worked, and followed all three girls on Insta:


https://www.ibtimes.sg/idaho-murder-suspect-brian-kohberger-twice-dined-restaurant-where-2-female-victims-worked-68695

Yes we know. This is old news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am wondering how close does a person have to be to a home for their cell phone to "ping" off that address?

On 20/20 last week, they said his cell phone connected with the houses Wi-Fi a few times. So pretty close.

How does that work? Did he connect to use their wifi? Or did their wifi somehow track his phone tried to connect? It’s creepy to think our phones are leaving trails in the houses of strangers.

Doesn't the iphone do that now without our permission?

[Anonymous]

Yeah, you have you phone set to connect to unsecured WiFi I think it happens automatically.

[Anonymous]

New documents unsealed…
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/amphtml/annabetts/unsealed-search-warrants-bryan-kohberger-knife-gun

[Anonymous]

His next court appearance is June 26th???
they couldn't get to this case any sooner?
defies belief really.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:New documents unsealed…
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/amphtml/annabetts/unsealed-search-warrants-bryan-kohberger-knife-gun

the list is creepy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:His next court appearance is June 26th???
they couldn't get to this case any sooner?
defies belief really.

Do you think Covid put the court system behind just in the DMV? Why would someone who has been waiting for their day in court even in Idaho get pushed back just because another case is more high profile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His next court appearance is June 26th???
they couldn't get to this case any sooner?
defies belief really.

Do you think Covid put the court system behind just in the DMV? Why would someone who has been waiting for their day in court even in Idaho get pushed back just because another case is more high profile.

Because it's a multiple homicide. Obvs.

[Anonymous]

Will this affect enrollment at DeSales University do you think?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Will this affect enrollment at DeSales University do you think?

Why would it?