Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
IRS Whistleblowers and Devon Archer - House Oversight
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
Ivanka made 9 figures of income while a white house employee. Does that not raise an eyebrow for you? |
Anonymous
If you considered the Senate, House, and Supreme Court, there are easily more than 100 people who are more corrupt than any person in the Biden Administration. You can not name one corrupt action by Joe Biden that is supported by factual evidence. It’s all innuendo and speculation. |
Anonymous
|
If the Archer interview was so important, why was there only one GOP House member in the deposition whereas all Dem members showed up?
If you know the House, then you know Congressmen always show up when it’s important. Quite a tell. |
Anonymous
Create a thread then... this one is about the corrupt brand |
Anonymous
Of course it does. The Republican 'investigation' into this is just disingenuous and hypocritical. It's pure politics at the cost of accomplishing anything else. |
Anonymous
And what a thread it is. 54 pages of "meh" and "that's it?"... |
Anonymous
In May 2021 Shokin published his book in Brussels "Untold stories of Joe Biden's corruption in Ukraine or who cannot become US President". Every American should read it. But wait, you cannot buy it in US (I guess because one of the parties supports book bunning) |
Anonymous
Do you have any idea why Biden's administration not investigating this? |
Anonymous
Is someone forcing you to participate in this thread? Or is this your paid job? |
Anonymous
Shokin was the corrupt guy in the story. That’s not debatable. He took bribes from oligarchs to shut down investigations. His only serious investigation was going after the independent anti-corruption bureau that was investigating his core corruption. He was even more corrupt than Trump and Giuliani, if that is possible. |
Anonymous
+1000. Shokin was deeply corrupt. There were protests in Kyiv calling for Shokin's removal. IMF was calling for Shokin's removal. Anyone with common sense and decency was calling for Shokin's removal. It's wild that the MAGAs are still desperately clinging to some weird notion that Shokin was a shining knight on a white horse who was removed because he had the goods on Hunter Biden and Burisma and that his removal was to silence him. That's completely false. Shokin never even thought about investigating Burisma, let alone Hunter Biden, and his removal had absolutely nothing to do with Burisma or Hunter Biden. Ukrainian officials have repeatedly confirmed this. |
Anonymous
Why would anyone want to read a book written by a corrupt individual who is grifting with their lies? I mean seriously, if there was ANY proof of Joe Biden corruption, any legitimate journalist seeking a Pultizer would be pushing the story and banging the drum on it. The fact that Mr. Archer is making claims that cannot be backed up and admits they cannot be backed up should be the end of this, but idiots want to believe there needs to be more investigation when there is no proof to investigate. I mean, if it wasn't wasting taxpayer dollars, I really would not care, but between this and Durham, it is all vaporware and read meat for the rubes. Have at it. |
Anonymous
It’s voluntary. But to your point, is there a plan to start providing some interesting evidence and content soon…or is this going to be it? |
Anonymous
DP... Exactly my sentiments. Unless there is some ACTUAL EVIDENCE, and concrete details that can actually be shared, why do people keep pointlessly bumping this thread? |
Anonymous
This is going to be it, so you can stay out of the thread now and stop disrupting the serious, rigorous inquiry that is ongoing. |