IRS Whistleblowers and Devon Archer - House Oversight

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The firing of the prosecutor in Ukraine absolutely has to be further investigated.
Looks as if Joe was doing a favor for his son, contrary to the narrative that has been painted.

Then why did the GOP Senate, the World Bank, IMF etc all ask for it?

That all needs to be investigated. Did Biden convince these people that it needed to be done?
Why is there conflicting testimony over what happened?

On the one hand, you have facts, on the other you have a guy fighting to stay out of jail and will say anything to stay out.

Both sides.

And, his testimony was under oath.
Investigation is needed.

Has comer released a transcript or is he still hiding it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Transcript has been made public.

Well, his testimony seems to contradict the actual facts of what happened, given the Shokin WAS NOT investigating Burisma and was removed for his inaction.

Since there is conflicting testimony, it all needs to be investigated.
I am not convinced that Shokin was NOT investigating Burisma.

There is no proof to back Archer's claims, so what is there to investigate?

Ah, yes, let's just dismiss any testimony that may be detrimental to Joe.
"It can't possibly be true!"

There is PLENTY to investigate. When you have conflicting testimony such as this, you find the truth by investigating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The firing of the prosecutor in Ukraine absolutely has to be further investigated.
Looks as if Joe was doing a favor for his son, contrary to the narrative that has been painted.

Then why did the GOP Senate, the World Bank, IMF etc all ask for it?

That all needs to be investigated. Did Biden convince these people that it needed to be done?
Why is there conflicting testimony over what happened?

On the one hand, you have facts, on the other you have a guy fighting to stay out of jail and will say anything to stay out.

Both sides.

And, his testimony was under oath.
Investigation is needed.

Has comer released a transcript or is he still hiding it?

It has been released. In just a few days as promised.
Unlike Schiff who took weeks to release the transcripts he had.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Transcript has been made public.

Well, his testimony seems to contradict the actual facts of what happened, given the Shokin WAS NOT investigating Burisma and was removed for his inaction.

Since there is conflicting testimony, it all needs to be investigated.
I am not convinced that Shokin was NOT investigating Burisma.

There is no proof to back Archer's claims, so what is there to investigate?

Ah, yes, let's just dismiss any testimony that may be detrimental to Joe.
"It can't possibly be true!"

There is PLENTY to investigate. When you have conflicting testimony such as this, you find the truth by investigating.

He literally said under oath that he had no proof to his claims. So what is there to investigate if there is no documentary evidence as part of the testimony?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The firing of the prosecutor in Ukraine absolutely has to be further investigated.
Looks as if Joe was doing a favor for his son, contrary to the narrative that has been painted.

Then why did the GOP Senate, the World Bank, IMF etc all ask for it?

That all needs to be investigated. Did Biden convince these people that it needed to be done?
Why is there conflicting testimony over what happened?

On the one hand, you have facts, on the other you have a guy fighting to stay out of jail and will say anything to stay out.

Both sides.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Transcript has been made public.

Well, his testimony seems to contradict the actual facts of what happened, given the Shokin WAS NOT investigating Burisma and was removed for his inaction.

Since there is conflicting testimony, it all needs to be investigated.
I am not convinced that Shokin was NOT investigating Burisma.

There is no proof to back Archer's claims, so what is there to investigate?

Ah, yes, let's just dismiss any testimony that may be detrimental to Joe.
"It can't possibly be true!"

There is PLENTY to investigate. When you have conflicting testimony such as this, you find the truth by investigating.

He literally said under oath that he had no proof to his claims. So what is there to investigate if there is no documentary evidence as part of the testimony?

Just because HE has no documentary evidence, that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Transcript has been made public.

Well, his testimony seems to contradict the actual facts of what happened, given the Shokin WAS NOT investigating Burisma and was removed for his inaction.

Since there is conflicting testimony, it all needs to be investigated.
I am not convinced that Shokin was NOT investigating Burisma.

There is no proof to back Archer's claims, so what is there to investigate?

Ah, yes, let's just dismiss any testimony that may be detrimental to Joe.
"It can't possibly be true!"

There is PLENTY to investigate. When you have conflicting testimony such as this, you find the truth by investigating.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Transcript has been made public.

Well, his testimony seems to contradict the actual facts of what happened, given the Shokin WAS NOT investigating Burisma and was removed for his inaction.

Since there is conflicting testimony, it all needs to be investigated.
I am not convinced that Shokin was NOT investigating Burisma.

There is no proof to back Archer's claims, so what is there to investigate?

Ah, yes, let's just dismiss any testimony that may be detrimental to Joe.
"It can't possibly be true!"

There is PLENTY to investigate. When you have conflicting testimony such as this, you find the truth by investigating.

He literally said under oath that he had no proof to his claims. So what is there to investigate if there is no documentary evidence as part of the testimony?

Just because HE has no documentary evidence, that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

So you think after 5 years of investigation that has turned up nothing, there is still a need to investigate. Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhilr Hunter Biden trashed $4.2million Venice Beach rental and stiffed owner with $80k in back rent.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12361815/Hunter-Biden-trashed-4-2million-Venice-Beach-rental-house-rude-entitled-wife-Melissa-leaving-property-disarray-disrepair-stiffing-owner-80-000-unpaid-rent.html?ito=native_share_article-nativemenubutton

Welp, I won't be voting for him, then.

Same. He should be banned from public office! What a disgrace! I'm glad I won't be voting for him in the next election!

+100

When will the Rethugs realize that Hunter is simply a private citizen? Why bother a regular guy who travels on Air Force One, attends State Dinners, and received a $142k Porsche as a gift from a foreign government? Leave him alone!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thought Joe never discussed Hunters business?

That is the lamest what-about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Transcript has been made public.

Well, his testimony seems to contradict the actual facts of what happened, given the Shokin WAS NOT investigating Burisma and was removed for his inaction.

Since there is conflicting testimony, it all needs to be investigated.
I am not convinced that Shokin was NOT investigating Burisma.

It’s not a debatable question. It’s a fact. It was thoroughly researched in Ukraine by everybody. It was researched by Republicans in the Senate. Burisma/Shokin is a dead horse your guys keep beating. It isn’t going to get up and run.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhilr Hunter Biden trashed $4.2million Venice Beach rental and stiffed owner with $80k in back rent.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12361815/Hunter-Biden-trashed-4-2million-Venice-Beach-rental-house-rude-entitled-wife-Melissa-leaving-property-disarray-disrepair-stiffing-owner-80-000-unpaid-rent.html?ito=native_share_article-nativemenubutton

Welp, I won't be voting for him, then.

Same. He should be banned from public office! What a disgrace! I'm glad I won't be voting for him in the next election!

+100

When will the Rethugs realize that Hunter is simply a private citizen? Why bother a regular guy who travels on Air Force One, attends State Dinners, and received a $142k Porsche as a gift from a foreign government? Leave him alone!

Do you legitimately care or are you (clearly you are) just playing politics? Do you want Ivanka investigated as well?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Biden’s are the biggest scumbags in DC

Isn't Trump arriving in DC today for his arraignment? He'll reclaim that mantle in a YUGE way!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Transcript has been made public.

National Pulse is going to run the Tucker interview with Sund

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Biden’s are the biggest scumbags in DC

Isn't Trump arriving in DC today for his arraignment? He'll reclaim that mantle in a YUGE way!

Trump is in his own category. But Bidens are trash.