You said “purty.” Hilarious..
|
I think that people were saying that you are delusional if you think a quality man is going to want to be with you, but that some losers will no doubt by some Doordash dinners for you and the kids to sleep with you. It's a pretty ugly picture you're painting. |
Having a man call me uber to Doordash would be SO embarrassing! As if I'm a child not capable to use my apps or really poor. I order Doordash for my college aged son. I have very high standards to dates though. Men need to organize them, as well as participate and pay for joint travel |
It goes back lot further than the 1950s and it’s an evolutionary trait that women seek men with resources who will share them; even women who have plenty of their resources of their own generally prefer a partner who is similarly or better resourced. It’s just evolution. There may be some exceptions, but fir the most part, it is how we are designed as a species. |
Idk. It seems pretty thoughtful of someone to do that. She was sick. |
Eh. I guess if your definition of "quality" is a man who doesn't do very much. All the men I date are in shape, attractive, make 6+ figures, fun to be around, good in bed, and treat me well. |
|
It’s been almost 28 years since DH and I had our first date at the end of our freshman year in college. At the time I just wanted someone I enjoyed being around, found interesting, enjoyed sex with. It just kept being very easy. The one criteria I remember was that I didn’t want to get serious with anyone who could never envision being a father.
I don’t think I realized at the time; but there were subconscious criteria. I’d seen him in the college improv group and in the early days of dating really enjoyed his quick humor and word play - it continues to be something I laugh at often, but I had no idea at the time how important humor was to me. Also, obviously we had picked the same college and there were certain things (valuing education, choosing a rural environment…) that this meant by default. Over time, I really appreciated how we resolved problems together and address frustrations. Communication would be necessary for me now, but I didn’t know that then. I also, over time, have come to really value how much he helps me see perspective and calm down when I’m spiraling. But I don’t know how one would know that while dating. Where we sometimes discuss that we picked poorly is that a lot of our strengths and weaknesses overlap - sometimes it would be nice to divide responsibilities in a “you like doing this and I like doing that” sort of way. But that only became clear when we had kids. |
You are surprised people are reacting to a post written to generate maximum engagement? |
|
Dating or relationship/marriage material?
For marriage the 6666 is the ideal. For dating and fun 6068+ will do. |
Men get triggered by that. If a woman has standards, she's damaged goods, delusional, and should accept whatever crumbs are thrown her way. But if a woman doesn't have standards, any relationship problems are her fault because "you picked him!". If a woman has kids, she shouldn't date. But we have the male loneliness epidemic because women aren't dating. What's really going on is cognitive dissonance. These men aren't being picked by women. They can't admit that *they're* the men people say "well you picked him!" about, and rather than rising to meet the standard, they expect women to lower their own standards. But in their own minds, they're good guys, despite them not really doing much with their lives or having any sort of emotional maturity. |
| 6.2/10. |
6’2”/10”? That’s oddly specific. |
|
"A lot of you sound like crazy old trolls. Why are you so upset about the 40 year old who has her pick of guys? Why isn't she allowed to have standards or preferences?"
+100 I really don't get why anyone has a problem with what she's written about her approach to dating. She's taking care of her own kids financially. She's financially independent and not hunting for a rescuer. She is clever and engaging enough that men can comfortably bring her around their colleagues and clients. Let's face it - most SAHMs are not the sort of people you could do that with, and a certain type of man values that. It's a very attractive quality to women too. My partner was someone I took to a client's annual party at her Annapolis waterfront estate within the first month of dating him. I loved that I knew he'd show up wearing the right thing, with the right bottle of wine for the hostess, and that he charmed all the people I wanted to impress. And why should she, or anybody, remarry anyone who can't substantially improve her current situation? She doesn't NEED a man. She's only going to put up with the downsides of marriage if the good stuff outweighs them. Makes sense to me. |
grit? It takes more grit to skip college, start your own business which I did and been in business 35 years. Your way of thinking is very old school. |
I guess you missed the part where PP said was a SAHM. And she of course she doesn’t look down on other women, while repeating the condescending things the men she chooses to associate with said about other women. |