Wicked 2

[Anonymous]

Terrible movie. The only reason anyone sees it is because universal spent $250 million on marketing to convince all the dummies out there to show up.

[Anonymous]

Did anyone think the new Tin man was psychotic? That was not his demeanor in the original Wizard of Oz.

The whole turning of Boq into the Tin man didn’t even make sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Terrible movie. The only reason anyone sees it is because universal spent $250 million on marketing to convince all the dummies out there to show up.

+1

Marketing for the first one was good and I really wanted to see it. Only to be hugely disappointed. Sure the two marketed songs were great but the rest fell flat. As someone who had not see the Broadway musical I felt there was no character development and I could not have cares less about either character.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The love scene was ick for a family movie. You can show romance without disrobing .

Yes! I was honestly shocked about it. It was so gross. The idea that a gorgeous man would choose that ugly green witch over beautiful Glinda is ludicrous and laughable.

And then when he turned his gun on Glinda? Worst character development ever!

Elphaba isn't ugly. And she has more character than Glinda--trying to save the animals and help people understand that something bad is happening in Oz.

She may have more character but she is not attractive at all. Elphaba and Fiyero had no chemistry.

Fiyero and Glinda didn't have chemistry either. Maybe you're seeing what you want to see due to your own biases.

I agree with this too. But in the real world, a handsome man like Fiyero wouldn’t have chosen the green wicked witch. Sorry.

I mean... I feel like the problem with this statement is obvious.

? Are you actually trying to make this about race now?

Oh dear God. Let me explain PPs post as simply as possible. There are no “green wicked witches” in the “real world.”

But you were pretty quick to make it about race!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The love scene was ick for a family movie. You can show romance without disrobing .

Yes! I was honestly shocked about it. It was so gross. The idea that a gorgeous man would choose that ugly green witch over beautiful Glinda is ludicrous and laughable.

And then when he turned his gun on Glinda? Worst character development ever!

Elphaba isn't ugly. And she has more character than Glinda--trying to save the animals and help people understand that something bad is happening in Oz.

She may have more character but she is not attractive at all. Elphaba and Fiyero had no chemistry.

Fiyero and Glinda didn't have chemistry either. Maybe you're seeing what you want to see due to your own biases.

I agree with this too. But in the real world, a handsome man like Fiyero wouldn’t have chosen the green wicked witch. Sorry.

I mean... I feel like the problem with this statement is obvious.

? Are you actually trying to make this about race now?

Oh dear God. Let me explain PPs post as simply as possible. There are no “green wicked witches” in the “real world.”

But you were pretty quick to make it about race!

Please explain the biases comment then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The love scene was ick for a family movie. You can show romance without disrobing .

Yes! I was honestly shocked about it. It was so gross. The idea that a gorgeous man would choose that ugly green witch over beautiful Glinda is ludicrous and laughable.

And then when he turned his gun on Glinda? Worst character development ever!

Elphaba isn't ugly. And she has more character than Glinda--trying to save the animals and help people understand that something bad is happening in Oz.

She may have more character but she is not attractive at all. Elphaba and Fiyero had no chemistry.

Fiyero and Glinda didn't have chemistry either. Maybe you're seeing what you want to see due to your own biases.

I agree with this too. But in the real world, a handsome man like Fiyero wouldn’t have chosen the green wicked witch. Sorry.

I mean... I feel like the problem with this statement is obvious.

? Are you actually trying to make this about race now?

Oh dear God. Let me explain PPs post as simply as possible. There are no “green wicked witches” in the “real world.”

But you were pretty quick to make it about race!

Correct. That’s why it’s ridiculous to have Fiyero choose her. Green is scary and no one else in the world was green. Not realistic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The love scene was ick for a family movie. You can show romance without disrobing .

Yes! I was honestly shocked about it. It was so gross. The idea that a gorgeous man would choose that ugly green witch over beautiful Glinda is ludicrous and laughable.

And then when he turned his gun on Glinda? Worst character development ever!

Elphaba isn't ugly. And she has more character than Glinda--trying to save the animals and help people understand that something bad is happening in Oz.

She may have more character but she is not attractive at all. Elphaba and Fiyero had no chemistry.

Fiyero and Glinda didn't have chemistry either. Maybe you're seeing what you want to see due to your own biases.

I agree with this too. But in the real world, a handsome man like Fiyero wouldn’t have chosen the green wicked witch. Sorry.

I mean... I feel like the problem with this statement is obvious.

? Are you actually trying to make this about race now?

Oh dear God. Let me explain PPs post as simply as possible. There are no “green wicked witches” in the “real world.”

But you were pretty quick to make it about race!

Please explain the biases comment then.

That was a different post - and not mine, so I can’t “explain it.” But you really seem awfully defensive.

[Anonymous]

I went last night.
I was more annoyed by the 35 mins of previews than anything else.
Didn’t love how the Wizard was her bio dad. That was stupid, and the tin man and scarecrow
I did find it entertaining though which is what I went for and I like the messages about standing up for whats right, helping the animals, etc.

[Anonymous]

Spoilers…….

……..

- do we know why the Wizard was against animals?
- was the water melting the witch just a big ruse? Elphaba and Fiyero knew water wouldn’t melt her?
- what was the relationship between the Tin Man and the Scarecrow?
- why did they stuff the Scarecrow?

[Anonymous]

I liked it! It was not as good as the first, but nowhere near as terrible as this thread makes it out to be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Spoilers…….

……..

- do we know why the Wizard was against animals?
- was the water melting the witch just a big ruse? Elphaba and Fiyero knew water wouldn’t melt her?
- what was the relationship between the Tin Man and the Scarecrow?
- why did they stuff the Scarecrow?

He explains in the first part that he vilified the animals, so that it can bring people together by giving them something to hate.

The water melting Elphaba is a rumor that spreads in Oz (this is revealed during "Everyday More Wicked" at the beginning of the second movie), Elphaba takes advantage of it to fake her death but she and Fiyero know she can get wet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Spoilers…….

……..

- do we know why the Wizard was against animals?
- was the water melting the witch just a big ruse? Elphaba and Fiyero knew water wouldn’t melt her?
- what was the relationship between the Tin Man and the Scarecrow?
- why did they stuff the Scarecrow?

He explains in the first part that he vilified the animals, so that it can bring people together by giving them something to hate.

The water melting Elphaba is a rumor that spreads in Oz (this is revealed during "Everyday More Wicked" at the beginning of the second movie), Elphaba takes advantage of it to fake her death but she and Fiyero know she can get wet.

So that's why they included the sex scene? 🤔 😆

[Anonymous]

The sex scene was disgusting and I can’t believe they would have that in a family movie. Not one teen thought it was appropriate- they thought it was gross. And absolutely no one bought the Fiyero/Elphaba pairing, let alone how Fiyero pointed a weapon at Glinda. Awful character development.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The sex scene was disgusting and I can’t believe they would have that in a family movie. Not one teen thought it was appropriate- they thought it was gross. And absolutely no one bought the Fiyero/Elphaba pairing, let alone how Fiyero pointed a weapon at Glinda. Awful character development.

I am so confused by how visceral these reactions are. It’s not even a sex scene - they kiss, sing to each other, briefly levitate and then cut to a shirtless Jonathan Bailey. It’s so PG rated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The sex scene was disgusting and I can’t believe they would have that in a family movie. Not one teen thought it was appropriate- they thought it was gross. And absolutely no one bought the Fiyero/Elphaba pairing, let alone how Fiyero pointed a weapon at Glinda. Awful character development.

I am so confused by how visceral these reactions are. It’s not even a sex scene - they kiss, sing to each other, briefly levitate and then cut to a shirtless Jonathan Bailey. It’s so PG rated.

I saw it today and am reading this thread thinking what sex scene? There was no sex scene.

It was a long movie. I found it boring at times. I didn’t love that there were only a few good songs. The actress who plays Madame Morrible cannot sing at all and I don’t know why she was cast - good actress but terrible singer. Ariana was amazing. Cynthia was ok, not my favorite Elphaba as far as singing goes.