
Calling him a KID is a misnomer; Bares is a legal adult. 18. |
“He was less drunk and was being a good friend to the end, literally.” |
Did I say that it did? His "conduct" wasn't just driving! It was getting drunk AND driving. Choosing to speed on a roadway shared by everyone in this community with complete disregard for the safety of any other car on the road. This wasn't "boys will be boys" type of conduct. It was outrageous. And had very predictable consequences. The fact that they could have thrown the book at him if he was a few weeks older left plenty of people outraged. |
This. Had a seatbelt been worn this would have just been a bad accident and none of us would be talking about it. Sure kids would still be in trouble for driving drunk, but not for manslaughter. |
And that's relevant... how? A "less" drunk driver is still a drunk driver, and shooting a loaded gun onto a public road. You seem hell bent on defending this killer, and it's alarming. |
It wasn’t adult conduct, by definition. Teens can do terrible things before they turn 18, but that doesn’t generally result in their being charged as adults. In this case, the driver is legally an adult, and that has different consequences under the law. |
This is the second comment like this. So the story must be he was valiantly driving as the least drunk friend in the group. Which is why he drove and then made sure everyone had a seat belt on and drove at a reasonable speed. |
No, there are tons of threads where sick people get off on tearing people apart before they have any facts. Remember the family who died while hiking? The royal threads? Various political scandals? People really do get off on judging others, facts optional. |
I’ve replied and am totally amazed at how women - fellow moms - characterize the driver as a victim. Is it a cultural shift?
When I was in HS, MADD and other groups presented to the junior and senior classes. This was when the dinosaurs roamed in the 90s, before wine culture became more diffuse, with the health arguments (resveratrol in red wine, the French paradox) contributing to us feeling like we could mature as Americans and drink in a balanced way. And then that kind of plunged into other things, wine mommies, bad art from Marshall’s about wine o’clock, etc. is it that? Because I can’t imagine the moms who loved and nurtured and corrected us when I was a teen writing some of these justifications out, hitting submit, and being like job well done. |
No, we don’t know the story. |
You need to say more about why this is important to you. You’re getting ripped apart, but there must be some logic to what you’re saying and thinking. |
What story do you think is about to be uncovered? |
This is like a riddle. If you are the PP, you are suggesting this is the story. |
Is there anything you see as a fact in this situation? |
Oh stop with your definitions.I know this case is different from a legal standpoint. I'm just talking about why many people were upset when the other almost-adult had almost no consequences. That's why in my first post I said "technically" correct. We all saw what he did, and this wasn't some little kid just using bad judgment. It wasn't even just drunk driving. It was drunk driving and deciding to speed like a maniac. It was egregious. This was an almost-man taking a stranger's life engaging in reckless conduct that goes beyond just having a drink and getting behind the wheel. That's why it felt outrageous. I'm not trying to win the argument in court - I'm talking about why people were outraged. |