Britney Spears going broke

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I TOLD YOU SO, ‘FREE BRITNEY’ CRUSADERS!

This is deeply sad but entirely foreseeable. I wish I could call out all the posters who attacked me in the long threads on Britney’s conservatorship when I spoke from my years of experience in court and argued that most of what Jamie was doing was sincerely for the best interests of his daughter.

Does anyone really think her lawyer who has milked her for $4 million so she could pay $2 million more to Jamie’s lawyers has her best interests at heart?

Britney’s fall is going to be epic.

Does anyone really think she would be worse off right now if she was rehearsing regularly for a residency in Vegas while taking meds daily and seeing therapists weekly?

The only conditions of her conservatorship that anyone could seriously challenge as untoward was the requirement to use effective birth control. Yet I don’t think anyone could responsibly argue that she should have had more children in this lifetime.

Good thing her sons are nearly grown, sounds like she’ll be too poor for child support soon enough.

Her father was taking advantage of the conservatorship. If she wants to waste her money and do drugs all day then let her.

How did he take advantage? He was paid 100k a year to be the conservator which is an actual job.

Jamie hates California. He’s always in Louisiana

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I TOLD YOU SO, ‘FREE BRITNEY’ CRUSADERS!

This is deeply sad but entirely foreseeable. I wish I could call out all the posters who attacked me in the long threads on Britney’s conservatorship when I spoke from my years of experience in court and argued that most of what Jamie was doing was sincerely for the best interests of his daughter.

Does anyone really think her lawyer who has milked her for $4 million so she could pay $2 million more to Jamie’s lawyers has her best interests at heart?

Britney’s fall is going to be epic.

Does anyone really think she would be worse off right now if she was rehearsing regularly for a residency in Vegas while taking meds daily and seeing therapists weekly?

The only conditions of her conservatorship that anyone could seriously challenge as untoward was the requirement to use effective birth control. Yet I don’t think anyone could responsibly argue that she should have had more children in this lifetime.

Good thing her sons are nearly grown, sounds like she’ll be too poor for child support soon enough.

Her father was taking advantage of the conservatorship. If she wants to waste her money and do drugs all day then let her.

How did he take advantage? He was paid 100k a year to be the conservator which is an actual job.

Jamie hates California. He’s always in Louisiana

It’s not an actual job and it’s unethical to be paid to do it. It’s appalling that the court approved the accountings/Brit’s court appointed attorney didn’t protest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How is she already going broke? What about the money from her book?

The people around her, who moved in on her once she was no longer protected, are likely robbing her blind. It’s an age old story of mentally ill people being taken advantage of. Those who objected to her father paying himself to manage her will now see much worse people rob her blind and shrug that it’s her “choice,” as some a-holes in this thread have. The callousness and evil of so-called fans never fails. If this was their child, would they be so casual about her downward spiral?

[Anonymous]

I feel so bad for her. She’s been treated horribly by her family and seems to have no one she can trust.

She attracts loser hanger-on men, too.

[Anonymous]

No one in this situation looks good. The entire family is dysfunctional.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is America, you can’t take away someone’s rights just because you disapprove. If she wants to go broke, that’s allowed. If she wants to do Only Fans, that’s allowed. People are allowed to do things we think are bad or sad or stupid.

This. Give me a break. Her family is trash from Mississippi. They had their chance to get her proper help and just saw the $$ signs. Keeping under one any longer is inhumane.

The thing is, they may well have gotten her proper help. Once a severely bipolar person stops taking medicine the decline is almost instant. Doesn't mean she didn't have proper help, it just means she's chosen now not to take her meds.

We need better mental health care in this country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I TOLD YOU SO, ‘FREE BRITNEY’ CRUSADERS!

This is deeply sad but entirely foreseeable. I wish I could call out all the posters who attacked me in the long threads on Britney’s conservatorship when I spoke from my years of experience in court and argued that most of what Jamie was doing was sincerely for the best interests of his daughter.

Does anyone really think her lawyer who has milked her for $4 million so she could pay $2 million more to Jamie’s lawyers has her best interests at heart?

Britney’s fall is going to be epic.

Does anyone really think she would be worse off right now if she was rehearsing regularly for a residency in Vegas while taking meds daily and seeing therapists weekly?

The only conditions of her conservatorship that anyone could seriously challenge as untoward was the requirement to use effective birth control. Yet I don’t think anyone could responsibly argue that she should have had more children in this lifetime.

Good thing her sons are nearly grown, sounds like she’ll be too poor for child support soon enough.

Her father was taking advantage of the conservatorship. If she wants to waste her money and do drugs all day then let her.

How did he take advantage? He was paid 100k a year to be the conservator which is an actual job.

Jamie hates California. He’s always in Louisiana

He certainly did a better job than her , 100k is peanuts to manage the lunacy of Britney

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:K-fed left a pregnant girlfriend for Britney.
He’s a trashy dope smoker.

He can be trashy and a dope smoker but he wouldn't be the first person to leave a pregnant girlfriend for someone else (hello Billy Crudup for Claire Danes). He apparently has a good co-parenting relationship with his Shar Jackson. The dude is from Fresno, so I don't know what kind of guy you expect in terms of cheese/trash level, but there are plenty of cheesy people wh can be good parents. You don't read about him in the news at all although my friend out in California said he did DJ work and other things that would be promoted. But I don't see tabloid info on him doing drugs or getting arrested or whatever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is she already going broke? What about the money from her book?

The people around her, who moved in on her once she was no longer protected, are likely robbing her blind. It’s an age old story of mentally ill people being taken advantage of. Those who objected to her father paying himself to manage her will now see much worse people rob her blind and shrug that it’s her “choice,” as some a-holes in this thread have. The callousness and evil of so-called fans never fails. If this was their child, would they be so casual about her downward spiral?

+1 exactly

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is she already going broke? What about the money from her book?

The people around her, who moved in on her once she was no longer protected, are likely robbing her blind. It’s an age old story of mentally ill people being taken advantage of. Those who objected to her father paying himself to manage her will now see much worse people rob her blind and shrug that it’s her “choice,” as some a-holes in this thread have. The callousness and evil of so-called fans never fails. If this was their child, would they be so casual about her downward spiral?

Uh except they put her on stage like a circus monkey forced her to earn money for everyone else. There’s no law against being poor. Being poor might be the best thing that could happen to her. If it were my child, no, I would not want her performing against her will. Maybe she needs to hit rock bottom and work her way back up to be a cosmetician like Amanda Byrnes. At least it’s her own terms. unless she’s a danger to others she has the right to lead a regular life - just because you want/need for her to be a glamorous star doesn’t mean that’s right for her at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is she already going broke? What about the money from her book?

The people around her, who moved in on her once she was no longer protected, are likely robbing her blind. It’s an age old story of mentally ill people being taken advantage of. Those who objected to her father paying himself to manage her will now see much worse people rob her blind and shrug that it’s her “choice,” as some a-holes in this thread have. The callousness and evil of so-called fans never fails. If this was their child, would they be so casual about her downward spiral?

Uh except they put her on stage like a circus monkey forced her to earn money for everyone else. There’s no law against being poor. Being poor might be the best thing that could happen to her. If it were my child, no, I would not want her performing against her will. Maybe she needs to hit rock bottom and work her way back up to be a cosmetician like Amanda Byrnes. At least it’s her own terms. unless she’s a danger to others she has the right to lead a regular life - just because you want/need for her to be a glamorous star doesn’t mean that’s right for her at all.

You need your head checked. She is not merely poor. She is severely mentally ill and untreated, with a drug addiction and literal criminals circling her. She doesn’t make it another 5 years at this rate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is she already going broke? What about the money from her book?

The people around her, who moved in on her once she was no longer protected, are likely robbing her blind. It’s an age old story of mentally ill people being taken advantage of. Those who objected to her father paying himself to manage her will now see much worse people rob her blind and shrug that it’s her “choice,” as some a-holes in this thread have. The callousness and evil of so-called fans never fails. If this was their child, would they be so casual about her downward spiral?

Uh except they put her on stage like a circus monkey forced her to earn money for everyone else. There’s no law against being poor. Being poor might be the best thing that could happen to her. If it were my child, no, I would not want her performing against her will. Maybe she needs to hit rock bottom and work her way back up to be a cosmetician like Amanda Byrnes. At least it’s her own terms. unless she’s a danger to others she has the right to lead a regular life - just because you want/need for her to be a glamorous star doesn’t mean that’s right for her at all.

You need your head checked. She is not merely poor. She is severely mentally ill and untreated, with a drug addiction and literal criminals circling her. She doesn’t make it another 5 years at this rate.

what's the drug of choice? I've not heard that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is she already going broke? What about the money from her book?

The people around her, who moved in on her once she was no longer protected, are likely robbing her blind. It’s an age old story of mentally ill people being taken advantage of. Those who objected to her father paying himself to manage her will now see much worse people rob her blind and shrug that it’s her “choice,” as some a-holes in this thread have. The callousness and evil of so-called fans never fails. If this was their child, would they be so casual about her downward spiral?

Uh except they put her on stage like a circus monkey forced her to earn money for everyone else. There’s no law against being poor. Being poor might be the best thing that could happen to her. If it were my child, no, I would not want her performing against her will. Maybe she needs to hit rock bottom and work her way back up to be a cosmetician like Amanda Byrnes. At least it’s her own terms. unless she’s a danger to others she has the right to lead a regular life - just because you want/need for her to be a glamorous star doesn’t mean that’s right for her at all.

You need your head checked. She is not merely poor. She is severely mentally ill and untreated, with a drug addiction and literal criminals circling her. She doesn’t make it another 5 years at this rate.

what's the drug of choice? I've not heard that.

She says adderall but its really everything under the sun. When she was put under the conservatorship, there were lots of rumors that was doing meth.

[Anonymous]

“She’s not broke, but she definitely could benefit from being more careful with her cash. For over a decade, other people were in charge of her bank accounts, and every purchase had to be reported to the court — even if it was just a pack of gum. But now, she’s on her own.

She is at the point of recoupment with her $15 million publishing deal and earns very significant royalties for her candid book, which has sold more than 2 million copies in the US alone.”

Page six spin. I think this is closer to the truth. She's not broke but will be at the rage she's going

[Anonymous]

You all have no idea what goes on in celebrity lives. You only know the lies others tell.