v These programs typically have attendance requirements making it hard to be accepted if you skip school/class. |
A teacher I work with called home because one of their students was skipping class, swearing, throwing stuff. The parent said to the teacher, “maybe you’re not interesting enough.” The paradigm has to change. Parents need to reinforce that their child’s job is to learn. Teachers’ job is to teach. Not to like their students. Not to entertain the students. Teachers’ job is to prepare students for a job, the military or higher education etc., to be responsible so they can lead a productive and meaningful life. We have to stop asking schools to be all things to all kids. We need more specialized programs inside schools along with separate programs and more awareness and development of different pathways for kids with real barriers to learning, including significant learning or mental health needs. What we don’t need is to reinforce the idea that students don’t bear any responsibility for their own outcomes. Nor do we want to shame them if they’re not on a highly academic track. At my own large urban high school in a different state, students could learn how to be hair stylists, auto mechanics, construction workers, coders or teaching assistants in the same building as students shooting for high-caliber universities. Many of my classmates, the ones who went to top colleges as well as the ones who chose a more vocational route, still live and work in that community and are friends with one another and are fulfilling a variety of community needs. Few students were truant or wandering halls in my high school because they felt successful and were working toward goals they felt they could achieve and wanted for themselves. Communities also need highly trained doctors etc. and thus schools need to offer those students challenging classes that will prepare them for college and higher education so they too can serve in those capacities. |
How about the opposite- credit for actually showing up daily and participating? Where’s that? It would make a difference for kids who are 0.2 away from the next letter grade.
Currently a kid skips class or plays on phone and can earn the same grade as one who’s there. So what’s the incentive for being there? |
Why can't they punish these kids by kicking them out of school? I mean it's not like they want to be there so it's a win win. |
And then have them go where? The problem is that all issues can’t be solved in school there needs to be community systems. |
It is very hard for teachers to compete with addicting, curated personal internet devices. No teacher can be more entertaining and no subject can be more interesting that phones and the internet these days. |
+1 but unfortunately MCPS has gotten rid of truancy officers. |
- Return loss of credit policy - 5 tardies = unexcused absence, 5 unexcused absences = failure of the course - Return to final exams to hold kids accountable for their learning. - Eliminate the 50% rule as well as the due dates/deadlines. 0% for work not completed by due date, period. - Eliminate endless retakes. Some revisions and retakes may be acceptable, but kids know they can do this repeatedly, without limitation. - Give administrative detentions or other concrete consequences for kids who are tardy or missing class. - Return to assigning classes based on ability/achievement rather than lumping everyone into 'Honors' that isn't really honors. - Stop focusing on skin color at every turn and have high expectations that apply to all students - Suspend kids from school for major infractions. (vaping/pot smoking, fighting, leaving campus, etc.). - End the focus on 'equity' and 'restorative justice', meaning stop putting kids in a sort of group therapy session for rule-breaking. Give a clear consequence. Feel free to add to this list. The PP who stated that parents would be appalled to actually see what's happening in our high schools is exactly right. it's appalling. |
I teach in a majority-brown-black high school. If we did not implement the 50% rule very few students would actually graduate. |
Well, better to not graduate people who haven't met the standard then to socially promote and have them continue to flounder and fail in the post-high school world. |
Don't forget corporal punishment. Beat some sense into 'em. |
+1000 It’s almost like going back the fundamentals of having ANY expectations for kids is a good idea. Wow. Mind blown. |
Great logic tactic. Respond to an argument you can’t refute with an overblown sarcastic comment. No one wants to beat your kid. But consequences can and should be given for not meeting the BASIC requirement. |
I taught before the 50% rule went into effect in a school with high minority population / high FARMS rate. My students were successful. I believe all students can learn. |
+1000 The original comment insinuatingly that “majority-brown-black” kids can only graduate if we give them 50% is RACIST. |