Sanity Check - DH in Boxers

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some of you are so damn uptight.

Boxers are fine inside the home. No one's testicles are flying out. FFS

You've never worn boxers, I'm guessing? I'm male and it is not appropriate to hang around the house in underwear including boxers if you have other people in the house. It's weird and dysfunctional and speaks more to a failure in your existence to think it's fine to wear boxers in front of other people.

It's perfectly fine to wear them in front of your immediate family members (spouse + kids). Yes, I've worn boxers

[Anonymous]

10000000% acceptable


Zero percent difference between a man going out in public wearing boxer briefs vs the hordes of women wearing leggings and nothing else, which leaves absolutely nothing left to the imagination. Really zero difference between boxer briefs vs Lulu for women.

Women have their athleisure that is nothing more than barely above lingerie. Men gets theirs now too. You all don't lose your minds when you see a cyclist wearing skin tight biking shorts and nothing else. It's the same crap.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:10000000% acceptable


Zero percent difference between a man going out in public wearing boxer briefs vs the hordes of women wearing leggings and nothing else, which leaves absolutely nothing left to the imagination. Really zero difference between boxer briefs vs Lulu for women.

Women have their athleisure that is nothing more than barely above lingerie. Men gets theirs now too. You all don't lose your minds when you see a cyclist wearing skin tight biking shorts and nothing else. It's the same crap.

You kind of proved the point of everyone else who was saying it's not acceptable without even realizing it. No one bats an eye about a cyclist wearing biking shorts because that's their intended purpose. They are meant to be worn while biking. Leggins are also meant to be worn as clothing outside. Boxer shorts are undergarments and last I checked no woman goes to Giant in her bra and panties. Put some shorts over the boxers.

[Anonymous]

Put on some pants!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Age has nothing to do with it, it's unacceptable at 5 years old, 30 years old, 50 years old......

Your DH may be suffering from depression.

More likely he enjoys subjecting women to non-consensual nudity.

Oh please, all you gotta do is go to the whole foods afterwork and see dozens of women subjecting kids and families to what are stripper outfits everyday in their skin tight leggings that reveal every crack and crevice.

Double standard and hypocrisy on your part.

[Anonymous]

Never

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Age has nothing to do with it, it's unacceptable at 5 years old, 30 years old, 50 years old......

Your DH may be suffering from depression.

More likely he enjoys subjecting women to non-consensual nudity.

Oh please, all you gotta do is go to the whole foods afterwork and see dozens of women subjecting kids and families to what are stripper outfits everyday in their skin tight leggings that reveal every crack and crevice.

Double standard and hypocrisy on your part.

Men can wear revealing clothes if they choose. Short shorts, tanks with huge armholes that essentially cover nothing, skintight pants, heck they don't even have to wear shirts in many public places.

But those are clothes. Boxers are underwear. There is a difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Age has nothing to do with it, it's unacceptable at 5 years old, 30 years old, 50 years old......

Your DH may be suffering from depression.

More likely he enjoys subjecting women to non-consensual nudity.

Oh please, all you gotta do is go to the whole foods afterwork and see dozens of women subjecting kids and families to what are stripper outfits everyday in their skin tight leggings that reveal every crack and crevice.

Double standard and hypocrisy on your part.

Men can wear revealing clothes if they choose. Short shorts, tanks with huge armholes that essentially cover nothing, skintight pants, heck they don't even have to wear shirts in many public places.

But those are clothes. Boxers are underwear. There is a difference.

+1

It would only be equivalent if a woman walked around Whole Foods in her underwear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Age has nothing to do with it, it's unacceptable at 5 years old, 30 years old, 50 years old......

Your DH may be suffering from depression.

More likely he enjoys subjecting women to non-consensual nudity.

Oh please, all you gotta do is go to the whole foods afterwork and see dozens of women subjecting kids and families to what are stripper outfits everyday in their skin tight leggings that reveal every crack and crevice.

Double standard and hypocrisy on your part.

Boxers = underwear (meant to be worn under clothing)
Leggings = exercise clothing (meant to be worn whenever)

PUT SOME SHORTS ON

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I’m talking about things like going out to get the mail, mowing the grass or working on a car in the driveway. Barbecuing. Maybe doing a short errand like driving to KFC or the hardware store.

Man here. The ohter guys are teh hardware store won't care a lick about it.

Hardware stores are not male only places. Plenty of women there who do NOT want to see a man in boxers there.

Pot meets kettle. Grocery store, restaurants and virtually the entire public are NOT female only places, so stop subjecting children and families to your ridiculous lingerie yoga pants please. You people are everywhere everyday showing your booty in super revealing tights. Total hypocrisy.

[Anonymous]

My DH would never go outside of our house in Falls Church in boxers. He does, however, go outside in boxers and a tshirt at our cabin on the Shenandoah River. One of the neighbor's nephews started calling him "Mr boxer shorts man." It was embarrassing as hell. But there's hardly ever anybody up there to see him, except that one neighbor's nephew a few times, so I guess it doesn't really matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Age has nothing to do with it, it's unacceptable at 5 years old, 30 years old, 50 years old......

Your DH may be suffering from depression.

More likely he enjoys subjecting women to non-consensual nudity.

Oh please, all you gotta do is go to the whole foods afterwork and see dozens of women subjecting kids and families to what are stripper outfits everyday in their skin tight leggings that reveal every crack and crevice.

Double standard and hypocrisy on your part.

Boxers = underwear (meant to be worn under clothing)
Leggings = exercise clothing (meant to be worn whenever)

PUT SOME SHORTS ON

It's made of the same materials, fits the same exact way as legging and yoga pants, and is the exact same as biker shorts. You have a mental block.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Age has nothing to do with it, it's unacceptable at 5 years old, 30 years old, 50 years old......

Your DH may be suffering from depression.

More likely he enjoys subjecting women to non-consensual nudity.

Oh please, all you gotta do is go to the whole foods afterwork and see dozens of women subjecting kids and families to what are stripper outfits everyday in their skin tight leggings that reveal every crack and crevice.

Double standard and hypocrisy on your part.

Boxers = underwear (meant to be worn under clothing)
Leggings = exercise clothing (meant to be worn whenever)

PUT SOME SHORTS ON

It's made of the same materials, fits the same exact way as legging and yoga pants, and is the exact same as biker shorts. You have a mental block.

You aren't very bright.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Age has nothing to do with it, it's unacceptable at 5 years old, 30 years old, 50 years old......

Your DH may be suffering from depression.

More likely he enjoys subjecting women to non-consensual nudity.

Oh please, all you gotta do is go to the whole foods afterwork and see dozens of women subjecting kids and families to what are stripper outfits everyday in their skin tight leggings that reveal every crack and crevice.

Double standard and hypocrisy on your part.

Boxers = underwear (meant to be worn under clothing)
Leggings = exercise clothing (meant to be worn whenever)

PUT SOME SHORTS ON

It's made of the same materials, fits the same exact way as legging and yoga pants, and is the exact same as biker shorts. You have a mental block.

Not a single word of that is true about boxer shorts. I think you're arguing about boxer briefs? It's still not really true, but at least closer to biker shorts/leggings than boxers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some of you are so damn uptight.

Boxers are fine inside the home. No one's testicles are flying out. FFS

You've never worn boxers, I'm guessing? I'm male and it is not appropriate to hang around the house in underwear including boxers if you have other people in the house. It's weird and dysfunctional and speaks more to a failure in your existence to think it's fine to wear boxers in front of other people.

It's perfectly fine to wear them in front of your immediate family members (spouse + kids). Yes, I've worn boxers

Going to disagree with you on that.