"Justice" a new documentary on Kavanaugh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: the loser Republicans on this thread are so predictable in their misogyny and simultaneous fear of the fact that she was a reliable witness.

And she’s not even the point of Brett Kavanaugh. The point is that he is unfit for the bench in temperament and in his total and complete lack of honor. The other point is that the GOP is corrupt and corrupts everything they touch. They are unfit.

Ahem I'm reading much from loser Dems on this thread.

We have a great SCOTUS in place.

Well sure if great means stomping out rights our daughters have held for their entire lives and probably stripping those away from their daughters as well

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I cannot believe that someone could watch both testimonies and walk away from that thinking that Kavanaugh was fit to be on the Supreme Court. All he needed to do was the calmly say something like how he didn’t believe that he was possible of doing that, that he did have a drinking problem when he was a teenager and that he’s spent the rest of his life trying to be a supporter of women by hiring a greater percentage of female clerks than the vast majority of judges. People who would be willing to say that people can change from their 18-year old selves. Instead he lied about his drinking, he lied about his behaviors in high school and college and he went completely unhinged about the Clintons and how he hates all Democrats. Frankly we should only have justices who can rise above partisanship- instead was have an immoral, unhinged, extreme partisan on the court. Just what we need.

NOT ONE THING KAVANAUGH SAID or "should have said" would have satisfied any of you rabid liberals.
Try being falsely accused of gang rape - very publicly - and then calmly respond to ridiculous questions.
And, he lied about NOTHING.

You folks need to just get over your Kavanaugh fetish and resign yourselves to the fact that he is on the Supreme Court and will remain there for a very long time.
Even though there are some among your ranks that have considered assassinating him.

How on earth can you say he lied about nothing. You can’t possibly know that.

[Anonymous]

To all the Kavanugh supports you are insane.

Fact someone paid his debts the there is no way he can be honest on that court. Full Stop.

So next time you post that he's not a liar the FACTS do not lie. He literally took money and sold his sole.

As for the rape charges they were never investigated so you have nothing zero nadda to back up your point.

If he is so not guility than he should have welcomed an investigation.

Let's try this again Who paid his mortgage? OVER a MILLION $ who paid his credit cards off $200,000 This right here he lied on his discloure forms .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Calling CBF a"hot mess," that you can tell that she is lying just by looking at her, she doesn't remember dates, times, people after decades are victim blaming. People like you are the reason rape victims do not want to testify and rapists go free.

Shame on all of you

Yet people saying they can tell Kavanaugh is lying just by looking at him are reasonable right?

The screeching, nastiness, combativeness... totally unhinged. Do you remember his exchange with Amy Klobuchar?

So I guess that’s a "yes" from you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Calling CBF a"hot mess," that you can tell that she is lying just by looking at her, she doesn't remember dates, times, people after decades are victim blaming. People like you are the reason rape victims do not want to testify and rapists go free.

Shame on all of you

Yet people saying they can tell Kavanaugh is lying just by looking at him are reasonable right?

The screeching, nastiness, combativeness... totally unhinged. Do you remember his exchange with Amy Klobuchar?

So I guess that’s a "yes" from you?

Kavanaugh is trash, lying scum that is a fact. That's right his fiances prove it. No getting around that one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Confirmation hearings. If proved that he lied during these hearings, then he can be impeached. Fat chance, I know but it will be a lot more than a ripple.

https://variety.com/2023/film/news/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-documentary-sundance-1235495305/amp/

And, if Ford lied can she be prosecuted? Because I believe that is much more likely.

Ford clearly lied. I watched her testimony and she showed all signs of lying.

Why in the world would she put herself through that? You are an idiot.

Kavanaugh should not be on the bench he lied fact, who paid his debts not him which means he lied on his disclosure forms. If he lied there then there is a great chance he lied about Ford.

Bottom line who paid off his house at a million $ and his credit card debt of $200,000????????

To stop Kavanaugh from being on the Supreme Court. The hope was that they could get a nominee more of their liking, especially if they could push it past the election with Democrats making gains.

DP... please do address the question of how Kavanaugh's debt and financial problems evaporated overnight

No one has an answer on this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Confirmation hearings. If proved that he lied during these hearings, then he can be impeached. Fat chance, I know but it will be a lot more than a ripple.

https://variety.com/2023/film/news/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-documentary-sundance-1235495305/amp/

And, if Ford lied can she be prosecuted? Because I believe that is much more likely.

Ford clearly lied. I watched her testimony and she showed all signs of lying.

Why in the world would she put herself through that? You are an idiot.

Kavanaugh should not be on the bench he lied fact, who paid his debts not him which means he lied on his disclosure forms. If he lied there then there is a great chance he lied about Ford.

Bottom line who paid off his house at a million $ and his credit card debt of $200,000????????

To stop Kavanaugh from being on the Supreme Court. The hope was that they could get a nominee more of their liking, especially if they could push it past the election with Democrats making gains.

DP... please do address the question of how Kavanaugh's debt and financial problems evaporated overnight

No one has an answer on this.

Sounds like made up bs.

If there was anything credible Dems would have used it during the hearings instead of Ford's wild imagination and lack of evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Confirmation hearings. If proved that he lied during these hearings, then he can be impeached. Fat chance, I know but it will be a lot more than a ripple.

https://variety.com/2023/film/news/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-documentary-sundance-1235495305/amp/

And, if Ford lied can she be prosecuted? Because I believe that is much more likely.

Ford clearly lied. I watched her testimony and she showed all signs of lying.

Why in the world would she put herself through that? You are an idiot.

Kavanaugh should not be on the bench he lied fact, who paid his debts not him which means he lied on his disclosure forms. If he lied there then there is a great chance he lied about Ford.

Bottom line who paid off his house at a million $ and his credit card debt of $200,000????????

To stop Kavanaugh from being on the Supreme Court. The hope was that they could get a nominee more of their liking, especially if they could push it past the election with Democrats making gains.

DP... please do address the question of how Kavanaugh's debt and financial problems evaporated overnight

No one has an answer on this.

Sounds like made up bs.

If there was anything credible Dems would have used it during the hearings instead of Ford's wild imagination and lack of evidence.

The FBI did not conduct an adequate background check to provide the "Dems" with sufficient evidence.



Sheldon Whitehouse, a Democratic senator and former prosecutor who serves on the judiciary committee, is calling on the newly-confirmed attorney general, Merrick Garland, to help facilitate “proper oversight” by the Senate into questions about how thoroughly the FBI investigated Kavanaugh during his confirmation hearing.

The supreme court justice was accused of sexual assault by Christine Blasey Ford and faced several other allegations of misconduct following Ford’s harrowing testimony of an alleged assault when she and Kavanaugh were in high school.

Kavanaugh denied the claims.

The FBI was called to investigate the allegations during the Senate confirmation process but was later accused by some Democratic senators of conducting an incomplete background check. For example, two key witnesses – Ford and Kavanaugh – were never interviewed as part of the inquiry.

Among the concerns listed in Whitehouse’s letter to Garland are allegations that some witnesses who wanted to share their accounts with the FBI could not find anyone at the bureau who would accept their testimony and that it had not assigned any individual to accept or gather evidence.

“This was unique behavior in my experience, as the Bureau is usually amenable to information and evidence; but in this matter the shutters were closed, the drawbridge drawn up, and there was no point of entry by which members of the public or Congress could provide information to the FBI,” Whitehouse said.

He added that, once the FBI decided to create a “tip line”, senators were not given any information on how or whether new allegations were processed and evaluated. While senators’ brief review of the allegations gathered by the tip line showed a “stack” of information had come in, there was no further explanation on the steps that had been taken to review the information, Whitehouse said.

“This ‘tip line’ appears to have operated more like a garbage chute, with everything that came down the chute consigned without review to the figurative dumpster,” he said.

He also criticized FBI director Chris Wray, who Joe Biden has elected to remain in place, for not answering questions about the investigation.

The FBI did not respond to a request for comment. The DOJ did not respond to a request for comment.


FBI facing allegation that its 2018 background check of Brett Kavenaugh was 'fake'
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/mar/16/fbi-brett-kavanaugh-background-check-fake

[Anonymous]

This is pathetic.

The moderator deletes later posts for who know what reason but allows the stupid lid by commie far left foreign Guardian to stay there and with dumb font?

dcum is a joke. Russian op? Chinese?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
This is pathetic.

The moderator deletes later posts for who know what reason but allows the stupid lid by commie far left foreign Guardian to stay there and with dumb font?

dcum is a joke. Russian op? Chinese?

PP here. I linked to the Guardian and made the font smaller in the quoted text, d*****s. It was the first article I found. And I made the text smaller because most people won't read it and I didn't want the quoted text to take up a huge amount of space. So much for your cray cray theories.

Here is the exact same info from US-based sources.

The Hill: Democratic senator suggests FBI background investigation of Brett Kavanugh fake
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/543389-dem-senator-suggests-fbi-background-investigation-of-brett-kavanaugh-fake/

CBS News: Senator alleges FBI's Brett Kavanaugh investigation may have been "fake"
www.cbsnews.com/news/brett-kavanaugh-fbi-background-check-senator-allegation/


Judging from your use of words like "commie" you must be 1) a foreign op yourself or 2) stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Confirmation hearings. If proved that he lied during these hearings, then he can be impeached. Fat chance, I know but it will be a lot more than a ripple.

https://variety.com/2023/film/news/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-documentary-sundance-1235495305/amp/

And, if Ford lied can she be prosecuted? Because I believe that is much more likely.

Ford clearly lied. I watched her testimony and she showed all signs of lying.

Are you a forensic psychiatrist? If so I’d love to hear more. If not then you are a fool for posting this.

Cute.

No, I'm not a "forensic psychiatrist" but someone trained in a much more relevant discipline.

Ford was clearly lying. She was making things up about her lie-detector test -- it was obvious.

I’m very interested in what that relevant discipline is and what signs you saw.

Won't share the discipline but here is something that was a red flag to me and colleagues.

At some point Ford said that she had taken a lie detector test the very same day her grandma (or mother?) had died. The interviewer then interrupted to doublecheck if that was the case, because you should never take such a test in such an emotional moment, it screws the baseline and the results.

Ford realized that her previous testimony made no sense and improvised something like "Uh I'm not sure, might have been a day before or after the funeral"

Which makes even less sense. Attending your grandma's funeral is one of those moments you remember vividly, and if you took a lie detector test in some office that same day you'd remember it. And if you say it was that day you don't just make things up and then say it might have been a day before or later.

My brother died when I was 28. I went to his funeral and I do know the month but have no idea of the actual date.

You probably also think that Anita Hill lied

It's not about the actual date. You would remember if you did something else major the same day.

Exactly. Especially if it happened less than a year ago and you had spent weeks training your testimony with multiple lawyers (all helpfully provided by the Democratic Party).

Ford was an obvious fraud.

Even with her trained testimony she came off as being unhinged. She was a hot mess and had a crazed look in her eyes. Definitely not a credible witness to everyone except hard core dems.

Actually, you are describing Kavanaugh quite accurately— screaming about his beer, red faced and teary. That alone should have raised serious questions about his fitness for the court. Most of us don’t approach job interviews like that, and, if we did, we almost certainly would not get the job. It did, however, distract from the very major issue of who paid his bills — something that could keep someone with a much less impactful job from getting a security clearance. Who owns him? And what are they getting for their money?

(Yalie from that era who finds Ford to be quite credible.).

When the police interrogate a potential suspect, they look at behavior like Kavanaugh’s. They consider it normal to be angry and upset when accused of a crime you didn’t commit.

Exactly. I'd be red-faced and teary too had I been falsely accused, in front of the entire world. And it wasn't as if these false accusations had happened months ago, and he had had time to process and compose himself. If I recall, he had to appear in the hearing immediately after the accusations were lobbed.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Confirmation hearings. If proved that he lied during these hearings, then he can be impeached. Fat chance, I know but it will be a lot more than a ripple.

https://variety.com/2023/film/news/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-documentary-sundance-1235495305/amp/

And, if Ford lied can she be prosecuted? Because I believe that is much more likely.

Ford clearly lied. I watched her testimony and she showed all signs of lying.

I hope you never serve in a jury.

Guilt or innocence should be established on facts, not feelings.

True.
And, Ford came with no facts whatsoever. Even the people she claimed to have been present (including her best friend) could not confirm her story.
She had no dates, places, or anything close to facts.

She was lucky not to be prosecuted for perjury.

Oh SHE is lucky not to be prosecuted for perjury???? How about "Roe is settled law"????

Kavanaugh perjury right there!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Confirmation hearings. If proved that he lied during these hearings, then he can be impeached. Fat chance, I know but it will be a lot more than a ripple.

https://variety.com/2023/film/news/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-documentary-sundance-1235495305/amp/

And, if Ford lied can she be prosecuted? Because I believe that is much more likely.

Ford clearly lied. I watched her testimony and she showed all signs of lying.

Are you a forensic psychiatrist? If so I’d love to hear more. If not then you are a fool for posting this.

Cute.

No, I'm not a "forensic psychiatrist" but someone trained in a much more relevant discipline.

Ford was clearly lying. She was making things up about her lie-detector test -- it was obvious.

I’m very interested in what that relevant discipline is and what signs you saw.

Won't share the discipline but here is something that was a red flag to me and colleagues.

At some point Ford said that she had taken a lie detector test the very same day her grandma (or mother?) had died. The interviewer then interrupted to doublecheck if that was the case, because you should never take such a test in such an emotional moment, it screws the baseline and the results.

Ford realized that her previous testimony made no sense and improvised something like "Uh I'm not sure, might have been a day before or after the funeral"

Which makes even less sense. Attending your grandma's funeral is one of those moments you remember vividly, and if you took a lie detector test in some office that same day you'd remember it. And if you say it was that day you don't just make things up and then say it might have been a day before or later.

My brother died when I was 28. I went to his funeral and I do know the month but have no idea of the actual date.

You probably also think that Anita Hill lied

It's not about the actual date. You would remember if you did something else major the same day.

Exactly. Especially if it happened less than a year ago and you had spent weeks training your testimony with multiple lawyers (all helpfully provided by the Democratic Party).

Ford was an obvious fraud.

Even with her trained testimony she came off as being unhinged. She was a hot mess and had a crazed look in her eyes. Definitely not a credible witness to everyone except hard core dems.

Actually, you are describing Kavanaugh quite accurately— screaming about his beer, red faced and teary. That alone should have raised serious questions about his fitness for the court. Most of us don’t approach job interviews like that, and, if we did, we almost certainly would not get the job. It did, however, distract from the very major issue of who paid his bills — something that could keep someone with a much less impactful job from getting a security clearance. Who owns him? And what are they getting for their money?

(Yalie from that era who finds Ford to be quite credible.).

When the police interrogate a potential suspect, they look at behavior like Kavanaugh’s. They consider it normal to be angry and upset when accused of a crime you didn’t commit.

Exactly. I'd be red-faced and teary too had I been falsely accused, in front of the entire world. And it wasn't as if these false accusations had happened months ago, and he had had time to process and compose himself. If I recall, he had to appear in the hearing immediately after the accusations were lobbed.
DP

That's bullshit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

No, I'm not a "forensic psychiatrist" but someone trained in a much more relevant discipline.

Ford was clearly lying. She was making things up about her lie-detector test -- it was obvious.

Yes, trained bullshit artist.

The ‘escape door’ was a load of crap too. It was a door to a second apartment.

+1
As was the absurd “flying phobia” she claimed to have - yet that didn’t prevent her from flying off for far-flung surfing vacations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Confirmation hearings. If proved that he lied during these hearings, then he can be impeached. Fat chance, I know but it will be a lot more than a ripple.

https://variety.com/2023/film/news/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-documentary-sundance-1235495305/amp/

And, if Ford lied can she be prosecuted? Because I believe that is much more likely.

Ford clearly lied. I watched her testimony and she showed all signs of lying.

Are you a forensic psychiatrist? If so I’d love to hear more. If not then you are a fool for posting this.

Cute.

No, I'm not a "forensic psychiatrist" but someone trained in a much more relevant discipline.

Ford was clearly lying. She was making things up about her lie-detector test -- it was obvious.

I’m very interested in what that relevant discipline is and what signs you saw.

Won't share the discipline but here is something that was a red flag to me and colleagues.

At some point Ford said that she had taken a lie detector test the very same day her grandma (or mother?) had died. The interviewer then interrupted to doublecheck if that was the case, because you should never take such a test in such an emotional moment, it screws the baseline and the results.

Ford realized that her previous testimony made no sense and improvised something like "Uh I'm not sure, might have been a day before or after the funeral"

Which makes even less sense. Attending your grandma's funeral is one of those moments you remember vividly, and if you took a lie detector test in some office that same day you'd remember it. And if you say it was that day you don't just make things up and then say it might have been a day before or later.

My brother died when I was 28. I went to his funeral and I do know the month but have no idea of the actual date.

You probably also think that Anita Hill lied

It's not about the actual date. You would remember if you did something else major the same day.

Exactly. Especially if it happened less than a year ago and you had spent weeks training your testimony with multiple lawyers (all helpfully provided by the Democratic Party).

Ford was an obvious fraud.

Even with her trained testimony she came off as being unhinged. She was a hot mess and had a crazed look in her eyes. Definitely not a credible witness to everyone except hard core dems.

Actually, you are describing Kavanaugh quite accurately— screaming about his beer, red faced and teary. That alone should have raised serious questions about his fitness for the court. Most of us don’t approach job interviews like that, and, if we did, we almost certainly would not get the job. It did, however, distract from the very major issue of who paid his bills — something that could keep someone with a much less impactful job from getting a security clearance. Who owns him? And what are they getting for their money?

(Yalie from that era who finds Ford to be quite credible.).

When the police interrogate a potential suspect, they look at behavior like Kavanaugh’s. They consider it normal to be angry and upset when accused of a crime you didn’t commit.

Exactly. I'd be red-faced and teary too had I been falsely accused, in front of the entire world. And it wasn't as if these false accusations had happened months ago, and he had had time to process and compose himself. If I recall, he had to appear in the hearing immediately after the accusations were lobbed.
DP

K should sue Ford and Dems. He'd win.