Harvard undergrad and HLS grad. I agree with PP. Yes, Harvard sent a lot to HLS, but they had many applying. At the end of the day, you still need a high gpa and LSAT. A student from a "lower ranked" college with srong grades and scores would get into HLS over a mediocre H grad. |
Also, every one of those students is the valedictorian of their class, like I was at HYS law |
Feeders are NOT a thing. Correlation is not causation. |
+1. "Feeders" are not a thing. |
What about t15? The difference between GULC #14 and the next few schools is not that significant |
Also some notable colleges NOT on the list - Wellesley, Smith, Bryn Mawr, Mount Holyoke, Oberlin, Reed, Kenyon, Grinnell, Haverford, Claremont McKenna, |
"looking to study poly sci or poly econ in prep for possible law school."
Be aware that those subjects are only "prep" for law school to the extent that they require reading, writing, textual analysis. If I recall correctly, there is nothing in law school at all involving political science or political economics. Lawyer jobs don't have anything to do with political science or political economics, either. I'm sure there are exceptions. |
+1. In my Ivy law school class, other than undergrads from the same Ivy, the biggest "feeder" was my high school on Long Island. More graduates from my high school than any other college or university. |
Major in something where your kid can get a near perfect GPA. Also make sure they learn to write. Have them download a logic game app in their phone and take a practice lsat in HS and the first three yrs of college. Take a prep class for lsat. GPA and LSAT score matter most of applying from undergrad. You’re better off as a sociology major with a 4.0 then a Econ major with a 3.5. |
We are very analytical. I loved English and Bio in HS. My dad suggested the science major since I dabbled in thinking of medicine. My highest part of the SAT was the analytical section which didn't even count, near perfect score. I loved critical analysis and creative writing. I always knew the underlying theme of a novel and to this day watching movies and series I am telling everyone what something meant or was inferred long before they see it. I stayed in science, but write and analyze for a living. I am not in a lab. So many of my friends have a science degree and a law degree and found law school a cake walk. I do have one friend that was an English major at UVA and went to Med school and is now a doctor. |
What are you talking about, what causation. Obviously if you go to these feeder schools they prepare you well for top law schools, so you have a better chance of being accepted. |
Yes, there are things that matter for applicants on the bubble, but only those in the narrow "maybe" range. More than 90% get in on GPA and LSAT alone. On the bubble schools may care about things that show maturity or improved employment prospects. For example, having a PhD in the hard sciences, being a Rhodes Scholar, having done Peace Corps, having done Teach for America, having been a foster child, having overcome extreme personal adversity, etc. None of these are a substitute for a good GPA and LSAT, but can help if your scores are on the cusp. |
The common thread is most of these students will have high LSAT scores and high GPAs. The school doesn't matter that much. |
Harvard probably has a lot of students with interest in Harvard Law, but because Harvard College is so selective, the school is also producing a higher percentage of graduates that have high LSAT scores and high GPAs than the average undergraduate school. It is as simple as that. |
No. Going to a top college does not increase an individual's chances of admission to a top law school. GPA + LSAT are what matter for T14 law school admission. There is no special "preparation" for law school. Yes, thinking logically and being able to write are helpful, but that preparation can be done anywhere, and are unrelated to law school admission. LSAT: take a prep course. College does not prepare you for the LSAT. Time and time again, these threads about "feeders" for law schools devolve into lawyers saying that feeders are not a thing and nonlawyer parents and, more often, high school students claiming that feeders are a thing. Sorry, this is a pet peeve. There is no need to attend a "feeder" to increase one's chances of admission to a top law school. |