RW vs LW news
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
I'd actually call the MSM "neoliberal," which means they are all in on Wokism but totally ignore issues of class. The corporations want you to focus a lot more on race and gender than of class. Corporate board members are incredibly weathy. Top reporters range from very well paid to filthy rich. They are happy to let a few more black people into the top ranks as long as you don't ask why they make so much money. They'd rather you think other voters are racist so you split your vote than you all get together and vote based on class. You'd be surprised how many people on the right see this and how many people on the left don't. Nope. The media is all in on the GOP. https://twitter.com/goldengateblond/status/1456074966231703552 CNN interviewed this family but they didn’t mention that these people have 9 children, at least 7 of whom are foster children (meaning that they receive money for the food, lodging and care), they didn’t fact check the lie about the price of milk and they didn’t ask them how the child tax credit is helping them. https://twitter.com/brikeilarcnn/status/1456227125346832384 Youngkin, like Trump, owes his win to the media’s helpful framing and free advertising. https://twitter.com/mattsheffield/status/1456424583431557167 |
Anonymous
| This must be the 500th thread on where the media leans. |
Anonymous
The “liberal New York Times” at it again!
|
Anonymous
|
A thread full of navelgazing.
Meanwhile there's another active thread that's been showing current lies of FOX News. FOX tells provable lies on a daily basis... whereas the right whines about stuff that happened years ago, like "the Covington kid" who got nothing more than a nuisance settlement. |
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
|
Chuck Todd sucks. How did he get where he is? He is the worst. I don’t know anyone who likes him.
|
Anonymous
|
NPR is being accused of racism for calling Boston’s groundbreaking election of its first woman and first Asian American mayor a “disappointment” because she’s not black.
An online article and now-deleted tweet promoting the story both noted that Michelle Wu made history as “the first woman and first person of color elected to lead” the Massachusetts city — before then suggesting her victory wasn’t enough. “While many are hailing it as a major turning point, others see it as more of a disappointment that the three Black candidates in the race couldn’t even come close,” the story still reads early Wednesday. https://nypost.com/2021/11/17/npr-calls-boston-election-of-michelle-wu-a-disappointment/ Maybe this won't be deleted without explanation this time. What are the odds of that though? |
Anonymous
NPR saying that some people think the election is disappointing is not the same as NPR calling the election disappointing, but I’m not surprised that you and the New York Post don’t know that, |
Anonymous
It’s the same thing. I am sure some were disappointed she isn’t white or Latino, and some happy she is Asian, but NPR did not report on that. By picking and choosing the topics and angling articles on them, the bias is shown. “Others see it as more of a disappointment…”. What a crock. You can always find “others” on all issues. What makes that newsworthy or worthy of citing? Your bias is all. Here’s a clue. Report the facts first. Then in analysis pieces, show all sides of the arguments in an non-biased manner. Finally, while you can have an Editorial section, the newspaper itself should never have a voice there. Let others voice their opinions and let both sides of an argument have a voice. That’s how a truly unbiased news service behaves. |
Anonymous
E bikes and trees are not “niche”, they are climate change action. These items are essential and future focused, not something to be dismissed. |
Anonymous
|
The probem is fixing itself.
CNN has lost 80% of its audience since January. |
Anonymous
|