Kate's New Picture

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t get it. If a coworker hard a procedure and took 2-3 months off for FMLA would you demand to know what happened and where they are? It’s pretty safe to assume she isn’t dead. If she were a normal person, she’d likely be out and about on errands and school runs by now. But she'd isn’t and can’t go anywhere without be hounded and having her picture on every front page. Therefore, to recovery, she quite literally has to go incognito.


If I received an email that a coworker was out for 2-3 months for a medical procedure, I would wish them well and demand nothing.

If a month later my coworkers husband was supposed to attend some event involving the company and he cancelled at the last minute with no explanation whatsoever except to say "don't worry, Jane is fine," I'd think that was weird but go back to work.

If a couple weeks after that, I received an "update" on Jane featuring a heavily photoshopped picture of her with her children, where her children were wearing clothes almost identical to my coworkers Christmas card from last year except for some changes that looked clearly faked via editing, and accompanied by an explanation that this photo had been taken days before by her husband, I'd be on Slack with my colleagues unpacking the whole thing and struggling to get work done because, uh, this is getting very strange.

If Jane then sent a follow up email stating that sometimes she gets overzealous with photoshop and apologizing for any controversy, but no other information, I'd continue to scratch my head and I feel certain my colleagues and I would be combing over these missives trying to figure out if there is some kind of hidden plea for help in them.

If the next day Jane's cousin posted a photo of Jane and her husband to Facebook, only the husband was fully visible and Jane was turned almost completely away from the camera staring at a brick wall, I'd immediately text my colleagues with "WFT is going on, should be be doing something to help Jane."

If a week later our boss came into the office and was like "oh you guys don't worry, I saw Jane and her husband at Foxtrot on Sunday buying specialty jams, she seemed fine," I'd say "I will believe Jane is fine when I see her thanks, but also what kind of jam, I love jam."

I mean, if you want it to be a real analogy.


I don't think about my coworkers that much or follow them on Facebook. But, you do you.


Well aren’t you just above it all?


I actually like my coworkers. I’d be worried if they were MIA for sure.


But normal people keep it to themselves. They don't fill in the gaps with insane theories and obsess about it.


What? “Normal” people keep it to themselves? Nope. “Normal” people are curious by nature and discuss things with friends. The people who never talk are the weirdos.


DP. Ah, there it is! I posited earlier that the posters most rabidly obsessed about this are those who don’t understand why someone wouldn’t overshare or discuss a death in the family or other very private issues on social media. And here you are, to prove the point! Guess what: “normal people” handle things in ways that are best for *them,* not the insatiable gossip hounds who demand to know details that are none of their business.
Anonymous
Agree with the PPs that it's close but no cigar. It almost looks like someone hired actors who look similar but not identical. Is the Crown filming a new season?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Daily Mail has it from a different angle. I do not think this is her:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ushome/index.html


That’s not her.

WTF is going on? This is really fishy now.


I think it looks like her. She has a very very long torso and you can see this in the pic (as you see in all her other pics)
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Daily Mail has it from a different angle. I do not think this is her:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ushome/index.html


That’s not her.

WTF is going on? This is really fishy now.


This looks completely different to the puffy face Kate with her mom in the car .
Anonymous
The guy also doesn’t look like William
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The guy also doesn’t look like William


Not at all. They look like stunt doubles. Close but not them.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Daily Mail has it from a different angle. I do not think this is her:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ushome/index.html


That’s not her.

WTF is going on? This is really fishy now.


This looks completely different to the puffy face Kate with her mom in the car .


right lol. This woman looks 10/15 years younger
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:For those of you who don't believe Russia is engaged in a disinformation/fake news war, Russian media is reporting that Charles has died, complete with fake announcement from Buckingham Palace.


I've actually wondered if The Princess Party that posts incessantly here is not Russian powered.



What would be the point? I’m very informed about the troll farms and disinformation but I don’t see the point here.

There really are people who think that royalty aren’t humans with human flaws and take offense to any insinuation that they are. It’s bizarre when their dysfunction is so clearly on display generation after generation.


DP. I take offense at the maliciousness. I guess that makes me a Princess Powerpuff Girl. Bubbles, probably.

DP. The malicious and abusive posts come from The Princess Party.


I don't think those are the ones claiming a woman has been beaten, is in a coma, is getting divorced, her father in law died... (but there are no conspiracy theories in this thread!).


Exactly. The PP knows precisely who is posting malicious and unsubstantiated rumors and it isn’t those of us maintaining KM has a right to privacy. Such gaslighting.


+1
Anonymous
Is she carrying a grocery bag?
Anonymous
Just being causally ignored by the people at the picnic table, sure…..
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t get it. If a coworker hard a procedure and took 2-3 months off for FMLA would you demand to know what happened and where they are? It’s pretty safe to assume she isn’t dead. If she were a normal person, she’d likely be out and about on errands and school runs by now. But she'd isn’t and can’t go anywhere without be hounded and having her picture on every front page. Therefore, to recovery, she quite literally has to go incognito.


If I received an email that a coworker was out for 2-3 months for a medical procedure, I would wish them well and demand nothing.

If a month later my coworkers husband was supposed to attend some event involving the company and he cancelled at the last minute with no explanation whatsoever except to say "don't worry, Jane is fine," I'd think that was weird but go back to work.

If a couple weeks after that, I received an "update" on Jane featuring a heavily photoshopped picture of her with her children, where her children were wearing clothes almost identical to my coworkers Christmas card from last year except for some changes that looked clearly faked via editing, and accompanied by an explanation that this photo had been taken days before by her husband, I'd be on Slack with my colleagues unpacking the whole thing and struggling to get work done because, uh, this is getting very strange.

If Jane then sent a follow up email stating that sometimes she gets overzealous with photoshop and apologizing for any controversy, but no other information, I'd continue to scratch my head and I feel certain my colleagues and I would be combing over these missives trying to figure out if there is some kind of hidden plea for help in them.

If the next day Jane's cousin posted a photo of Jane and her husband to Facebook, only the husband was fully visible and Jane was turned almost completely away from the camera staring at a brick wall, I'd immediately text my colleagues with "WFT is going on, should be be doing something to help Jane."

If a week later our boss came into the office and was like "oh you guys don't worry, I saw Jane and her husband at Foxtrot on Sunday buying specialty jams, she seemed fine," I'd say "I will believe Jane is fine when I see her thanks, but also what kind of jam, I love jam."

I mean, if you want it to be a real analogy.


I don't think about my coworkers that much or follow them on Facebook. But, you do you.


Well aren’t you just above it all?


I actually like my coworkers. I’d be worried if they were MIA for sure.


But normal people keep it to themselves. They don't fill in the gaps with insane theories and obsess about it.


What? “Normal” people keep it to themselves? Nope. “Normal” people are curious by nature and discuss things with friends. The people who never talk are the weirdos.


DP. Ah, there it is! I posited earlier that the posters most rabidly obsessed about this are those who don’t understand why someone wouldn’t overshare or discuss a death in the family or other very private issues on social media. And here you are, to prove the point! Guess what: “normal people” handle things in ways that are best for *them,* not the insatiable gossip hounds who demand to know details that are none of their business.


DP but I actually agree. Normal people like to gossip (within reason). It’s fun and we learn a lot about human behavior—at least that’s what I tell myself!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://www.tmz.com/

Front page

Nice! It actually looks like Kate and she does appear reasonably healthy and happy. I’m relieved.


+1
Very happy to see her out and about. Looks like no coma, death, affair, divorce, or anything else to fret about - though I’m sure the resident armchair sleuths will fabricate something anyway.
Anonymous
sure not them. stunt doubles to make us speculate more.
Anonymous
That’s definitely William’s grimace
Anonymous
if not her double then she looks very so skinny but still energetic somewhat carrying
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: