Matt Gaetz tapped for AG

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good lord. They have actual receipts on Gaetz.

This is why Dems lose elections. They have completely lost touch with straight males entirely. What in any of that is damning for a single male?

Well, he was 35 when he had sex with an underage girl who was still in high school.

Plus, buying sex for money is illegal in most states.

It is YOU who has touch with morality (which many single men have).

Well if CNN says so, it must be true. They have a great track record for the truth.

It doesn’t matter that the largest judicial department in the land, the DOJ, ran by the Democrats cleared him and found no evidence for the claims. Congressional Republicans despise Matt and want to tar and feather him for other reasons, namely his stances on money in politics and kickbacks/donations to Congress. Matt, an extreme right winger stood by Ilhan Omar and AOC of all people against his own party’s wishes. He’s a maverick like Trump and that’s the real reason they don’t want him to lead the DOJ. Big business didn’t want Vance neither. Trump stayed firm and ignored the noise then, and he’ll ignore it now and stick by Gaetz

Yes they have gone hard core right wing to improve ratings. Lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good lord. They have actual receipts on Gaetz.

This is why Dems lose elections. They have completely lost touch with straight males entirely. What in any of that is damning for a single male?

Do you seriously believe this is the only piece of evidence they had????

Yes. What did they have on Trump? They don’t need much to create these investigations. Since Clinton, the news media and Congress has created a billion dollar industry with our tax dollars mind you on political prosecutions and expeditions/ egg hunts. We aren’t focusing on the issues affecting the voters lives. Everyone should be boycotting the cable news and writing their representatives.

I’ve seen not one parent pop up to say Gatez abused anybody. The best way to know a politician is for you and against corruption is when the establishment hates them and tries to ruin their career

Blah blah blah

Not sure if he's paying you or if you're just trolling for your own amusement. But you aren't very good at it.

Well at least I’m not getting called Vlad anymore. I don’t care about convincing you. Hundreds of pages devoted to Trumps imminent prosecutioral end went awry and I was also warning then that it was all trumped up charges based on nothing. The Democrats and Republicans stand with bipartisan support against Trump, Vance, RFK, Tulsi. Gaetz. Do you ever wonder why? The swamp despises the changemakers

Why? Because they’re all terrible people. McCain was a maverick that wasn’t despised. People love Bernie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares if he sent Venmo payments to women? Sounds like a caring John who pays his tab

The problem is that one of them was 17 at the time. (The other ones are problems too. Even in now-times.)

The 17 year old was Greenberg’s friend. Greenberg is claiming Gaetz was with her too but there’s no strong evidence that’s the case. Gaetz is claiming that now grown 17 year old and Greenberg are plotting against him in a shakedown for either money or media exposure/deals

Greenberg was pimping out teenagers and went to jail for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares if he sent Venmo payments to women? Sounds like a caring John who pays his tab

The problem is that one of them was 17 at the time. (The other ones are problems too. Even in now-times.)

The 17 year old was Greenberg’s friend. Greenberg is claiming Gaetz was with her too but there’s no strong evidence that’s the case. Gaetz is claiming that now grown 17 year old and Greenberg are plotting against him in a shakedown for either money or media exposure/deals

Greenberg and Gaetz were best friends and Greenberg was supplying Gaetz with girls. But here you people are trying "oh there's no connection at all." Puh-leeze. You have zero credibility at this point.

https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/t_fit-760w,f_auto,q_auto:best/rockcms/2022-10/221004-Chris-Dorworth-Rep-Matt-Gaetz-Joel-Greenberg-ew-627p-302179.jpg

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares if he sent Venmo payments to women? Sounds like a caring John who pays his tab

The problem is that one of them was 17 at the time. (The other ones are problems too. Even in now-times.)

The 17 year old was Greenberg’s friend. Greenberg is claiming Gaetz was with her too but there’s no strong evidence that’s the case. Gaetz is claiming that now grown 17 year old and Greenberg are plotting against him in a shakedown for either money or media exposure/deals

Even if this theory about him being extorted were true, you should ask yourself if a person with such poor judgment, who would not only associate himself with people like this as a sitting congressman but expose himself to being blackmailed by attending parties where prostitution and drug use were common and the bragging about those parties to colleagues despite their obvious distaste, should be attorney general.

Like his *defense* is disqualifying. Most people don't get themselves into jans like this. He's either a skeazebag or an idiot or both. No matter what he hasn't covered himself in glory here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares if he sent Venmo payments to women? Sounds like a caring John who pays his tab

The problem is that one of them was 17 at the time. (The other ones are problems too. Even in now-times.)

The 17 year old was Greenberg’s friend. Greenberg is claiming Gaetz was with her too but there’s no strong evidence that’s the case. Gaetz is claiming that now grown 17 year old and Greenberg are plotting against him in a shakedown for either money or media exposure/deals

Greenberg and Gaetz were best friends and Greenberg was supplying Gaetz with girls. But here you people are trying "oh there's no connection at all." Puh-leeze. You have zero credibility at this point.

https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/t_fit-760w,f_auto,q_auto:best/rockcms/2022-10/221004-Chris-Dorworth-Rep-Matt-Gaetz-Joel-Greenberg-ew-627p-302179.jpg

+1 Let’s also not forget Trump and Epstein are BFF

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good lord. They have actual receipts on Gaetz.

This is why Dems lose elections. They have completely lost touch with straight males entirely. What in any of that is damning for a single male?

Well, he was 35 when he had sex with an underage girl who was still in high school.

Plus, buying sex for money is illegal in most states.

It is YOU who has touch with morality (which many single men have).

+1 my concern is MAGA freaks are taking these crimes as marching orders

[Anonymous]

When you see the parasitic and corrupt warmongering swamp blob act like a salted slug …you know Trump picked the right guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When you see the parasitic and corrupt warmongering swamp blob act like a salted slug …you know Trump picked the right guy.

You left out bankrupt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good lord. They have actual receipts on Gaetz.

This is why Dems lose elections. They have completely lost touch with straight males entirely. What in any of that is damning for a single male?

Well, he was 35 when he had sex with an underage girl who was still in high school.

Plus, buying sex for money is illegal in most states.

It is YOU who has touch with morality (which many single men have).

Well if CNN says so, it must be true. They have a great track record for the truth.

It doesn’t matter that the largest judicial department in the land, the DOJ, ran by the Democrats cleared him and found no evidence for the claims. Congressional Republicans despise Matt and want to tar and feather him for other reasons, namely his stances on money in politics and kickbacks/donations to Congress. Matt, an extreme right winger stood by Ilhan Omar and AOC of all people against his own party’s wishes. He’s a maverick like Trump and that’s the real reason they don’t want him to lead the DOJ. Big business didn’t want Vance neither. Trump stayed firm and ignored the noise then, and he’ll ignore it now and stick by Gaetz

The FBI cleared Gatez?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good lord. They have actual receipts on Gaetz.

This is why Dems lose elections. They have completely lost touch with straight males entirely. What in any of that is damning for a single male?

Well, he was 35 when he had sex with an underage girl who was still in high school.

Plus, buying sex for money is illegal in most states.

It is YOU who has touch with morality (which many single men have).

The age of consent for sexual activity in most states is 16 years old. This applies regardless of gender. Out of the 50 states, 31 states have set the age of consent at 16. However, it's important to note that the age of consent ranges from 16 to 18 across different states. Some states have set it at 17 (7 states) or 18 (12 states).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good lord. They have actual receipts on Gaetz.

This is why Dems lose elections. They have completely lost touch with straight males entirely. What in any of that is damning for a single male?

Well, he was 35 when he had sex with an underage girl who was still in high school.

Plus, buying sex for money is illegal in most states.

It is YOU who has touch with morality (which many single men have).

The age of consent for sexual activity in most states is 16 years old. This applies regardless of gender. Out of the 50 states, 31 states have set the age of consent at 16. However, it's important to note that the age of consent ranges from 16 to 18 across different states. Some states have set it at 17 (7 states) or 18 (12 states).

It doesn’t matter what it is in “most states.” In FL where all this occurred, it’s 18. And the federal law on child sex trafficking also sets the age at 18.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good lord. They have actual receipts on Gaetz.

This is why Dems lose elections. They have completely lost touch with straight males entirely. What in any of that is damning for a single male?

Well, he was 35 when he had sex with an underage girl who was still in high school.

Plus, buying sex for money is illegal in most states.

It is YOU who has touch with morality (which many single men have).

The age of consent for sexual activity in most states is 16 years old. This applies regardless of gender. Out of the 50 states, 31 states have set the age of consent at 16. However, it's important to note that the age of consent ranges from 16 to 18 across different states. Some states have set it at 17 (7 states) or 18 (12 states).

The age of consent in Florida is 18. Isn't this the state he paid to have sex with a teenager?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good lord. They have actual receipts on Gaetz.

This is why Dems lose elections. They have completely lost touch with straight males entirely. What in any of that is damning for a single male?

Well, he was 35 when he had sex with an underage girl who was still in high school.

Plus, buying sex for money is illegal in most states.

It is YOU who has touch with morality (which many single men have).

The age of consent for sexual activity in most states is 16 years old. This applies regardless of gender. Out of the 50 states, 31 states have set the age of consent at 16. However, it's important to note that the age of consent ranges from 16 to 18 across different states. Some states have set it at 17 (7 states) or 18 (12 states).

The age of consent in Florida is 18. Isn't this the state he paid to have sex with a teenager?

Republicans need to ask themselves why they would defend someone like this to be the nation’s chief law enforcer. Honestly.

[Anonymous]

Declining to pursue charges is not the same as “finding no evidence,” as misstated above.”