2028 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Good grief, it's the "speed is paramount-guy" coming to haunt the recruiting year. Sure it helps, but there are dozens of counter-examples of top players who are not super fast.

No need to use specific players to argue back team.



Reads like a chick wrote that.


Didn’t realize this forum was just for men


It isn’t. The PP called the person a “dad.” The other poster said it read “like a chick.” Nowhere did anyone say stupid women were not allowed to post.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Good grief, it's the "speed is paramount-guy" coming to haunt the recruiting year. Sure it helps, but there are dozens of counter-examples of top players who are not super fast.

No need to use specific players to argue back team.



Reads like a chick wrote that.


Didn’t realize this forum was just for men


It isn’t. The PP called the person a “dad.” The other poster said it read “like a chick.” Nowhere did anyone say stupid women were not allowed to post.
Sounds like you're arguing that speed isn't paramount.
Anonymous
It is not the only thing. Don't have to take my word for it. You could: watch some college lacrosse, review the top 100 list from the class of 2025 and watch film, or go back and read the extensive analysis that was done last year on the UA 150 combine results comparing speed results and rankings of schools committed to.

Or you could take the word of the guy who allegedly had three girls with varying levels of speed commit in order, and came on here to troll you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It is not the only thing. Don't have to take my word for it. You could: watch some college lacrosse, review the top 100 list from the class of 2025 and watch film, or go back and read the extensive analysis that was done last year on the UA 150 combine results comparing speed results and rankings of schools committed to.

Or you could take the word of the guy who allegedly had three girls with varying levels of speed commit in order, and came on here to troll you.


When I watch college lacrosse it looks super fast, with fast players going fast. What do you see?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is not the only thing. Don't have to take my word for it. You could: watch some college lacrosse, review the top 100 list from the class of 2025 and watch film, or go back and read the extensive analysis that was done last year on the UA 150 combine results comparing speed results and rankings of schools committed to.

Or you could take the word of the guy who allegedly had three girls with varying levels of speed commit in order, and came on here to troll you.


When I watch college lacrosse it looks super fast, with fast players going fast. What do you see?


I see a variety of speeds and styles, with some very fast players, to be sure.
Anonymous
So to assuage all the Capital Blue parents, speed and ability do not matter; your recruiting history will win the day.
Anonymous
Thanks Buddy
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is not the only thing. Don't have to take my word for it. You could: watch some college lacrosse, review the top 100 list from the class of 2025 and watch film, or go back and read the extensive analysis that was done last year on the UA 150 combine results comparing speed results and rankings of schools committed to.

Or you could take the word of the guy who allegedly had three girls with varying levels of speed commit in order, and came on here to troll you.


When I watch college lacrosse it looks super fast, with fast players going fast. What do you see?
Where would I find the UA150 analysis regarding commitment?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is not the only thing. Don't have to take my word for it. You could: watch some college lacrosse, review the top 100 list from the class of 2025 and watch film, or go back and read the extensive analysis that was done last year on the UA 150 combine results comparing speed results and rankings of schools committed to.

Or you could take the word of the guy who allegedly had three girls with varying levels of speed commit in order, and came on here to troll you.


When I watch college lacrosse it looks super fast, with fast players going fast. What do you see?
Where would I find the UA150 analysis regarding commitment?


Page 93 of this thread.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Thanks Buddy


Was the pun intended?
Anonymous
I meant to say buddy ol’ chum.
Anonymous
Anyone watching the ‘27 recruiting and starting to worry?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Anyone watching the ‘27 recruiting and starting to worry?


How does this year compare to last? When was the first commitment, and when did most players commit?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Anyone watching the ‘27 recruiting and starting to worry?


No, its still early. If you talk to alot of recruiting directors, they will tell you it wasnt going to move as fast as it did with the 26 class. give it some time, many girls are going to camps this weekend in which they were invited to from calls/texts. You will prob start seeing a few commitments next week If I had to guess.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anyone watching the ‘27 recruiting and starting to worry?


No, its still early. If you talk to alot of recruiting directors, they will tell you it wasnt going to move as fast as it did with the 26 class. give it some time, many girls are going to camps this weekend in which they were invited to from calls/texts. You will prob start seeing a few commitments next week If I had to guess.


I think you are correct but it does concern me that there has not been one commit yet from Blue. I am not losing sleep over it but I really hope the ‘28s have a good Fall and move into some of the higher brackets.
post reply Forum Index » Lacrosse
Message Quick Reply
Go to: