Huh, the definitely not paid by Blake, constant Blake supporter was right about some non-public info. Imagine thar. |
Ayoub was one of a small list of people it could have been -- it was very obviously a director or person at a similar level on a relatively recent Wayfarer production. So Ayoub, Sethi, Scarlett Johansson, someone involve with Will & Harper... really only a handful of options because Wayfarer has not made that many movies. And really the timing didn't make sense for most of these because Baldoni would not have been able to be on set for most of these movies due to the nature of filming (Will & Harper was a documentary about a road trip) or the filming conflicted with IEWU. The people speculating that it was Ari Emmanuel, Liz Plank, Ryan Reynolds, etc., were all engaged in wishful thinking and clearly not really reading the declaration. Or handwaving the ways these people didn't fit with "whatever, Blake lies." There just seems to be an extremely loose relationship between many people watching this case and logic or reasoning. |
Right, you either spent hours researching this in an obsessive way or are employed by Blake. Either way, a bad look for you. |
Who cares about this random woman no one has heard of. She’s not even saying she was sexually harassed. This doesn’t help Blake‘s case at all. Just makes her look desperate. Its no different than them going after the content creators wasting a ton of time on that only to have ACLU step up and say yeah, you’re gonna cut this out. They look desperate and like they are trying to find evidence to support their case rather than going into a case with evidence. |
| Sure, Baldoni verbally abusing a female director is nothing to see here, but the unsealed recording that Blake herself put on the docket will be ruinous. |
It won’t be ruinous, it just may be that she took liberties with how it was quoted. Much like the rest of her case. |
I wouldn't be surprised if they did that either, but it's a bit OTT to suggest that warrants them hiring people to post about Ayoub, when the much more realistic explanation is people are reacting "organically" to something that was unsealed that people have been very interested to know, which happens to be bad for Baldoni. |
Yea, the Blake bot duo has a history of being very organic. Give me a break! |
If a poster supports posts in any way favorable to Blake, it is a bot (not just any bot, one if exactly two). If a poster supports Baldoni, they are authentic. When Liman's decisions benefit Blake, liman is on the take, hot rubbing with Blake's lawyer. When Liman's decisions benefit Baldoni, these are the only fair decisions. Or Liman issues them as cover for his Blake bias. If a person other than Blake reports negative experiences with Baldoni or Wayfarer, they are lying and likely paid by Blake. If a person reports negative experiences with Blake, they should be believed regardless of the recency or reliability of their experience. And so on. It's very fascinating, watching this ideology develop around Baldoni, a person most people had never heard of before last year. |
Wouldn’t you know, being falsely accused by the wife of one of Hollywood’s most powerful celebs will have people rallying for you. |
Baldoni supporters saying it was Reynolds were the craziest, to me. No logic whatsoever. In the quote, he is referring to Lively and Reynolds. THEY were the two dead bodies. So if he was talking to Reynolds at the time, he wouldn't say, "There will be two dead bodies. ... They better not test me." [or whatever language he used -- but it was "they" not "you"] The Baldoni supporters claim to be armchair detectives etc but some of them are very dense. |
| The craziest ones were the people adamant it was Scarlett Johansson. Conveniently, the Blake bots have ignored this stupid prediction from weeks ago. |
I forgot about that little period of insanity. Yeah Scarjo is not coming to save Blake lol. No one is. |
And the way they have gone after Ayoub, very fine upstanding people. So much support for other women. Bur supposedly it's all "organic". Sure! When their case goes awry they come after the "bots". So predictable. |
I haven’t seen anyone on the thread come after her. It’s more just that the story seems inconsequential. Baldoni still does not have a history of sexual harassment and for us to be a year in and all we are seeing is this is not going to help Blake. |