Petition to bring back SROs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

plus those were not in MoCo county. Not even in the same state.

The PP’s talking points are complete idiotic drivel.

Bring back the SROs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

every real incident shows they make schools less safe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

plus those were not in MoCo county. Not even in the same state.

The PP’s talking points are complete idiotic drivel.

Bring back the SROs.

Parkland and Uvalde happened in different states but the result is mostly always the same. SROs just don't work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

every real incident shows they make schools less safe.

Google is your friend. Plenty of positive stories too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

every real incident shows they make schools less safe.

Google is your friend. Plenty of positive stories too.

For every 1000 absolute disaster like Parkland or Uvalde there may be 1 nice story somewhere but its so rare and isolated it hardly matters

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

every real incident shows they make schools less safe.

Google is your friend. Plenty of positive stories too.

For every 1000 absolute disaster like Parkland or Uvalde there may be 1 nice story somewhere but its so rare and isolated it hardly matters

You know what’s not safe for mcps? Not having enough security. There are tons of serious incidents in mcps. Why do our kids need to feel unsafe in their schools because of people like you and their nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

every real incident shows they make schools less safe.

Google is your friend. Plenty of positive stories too.

For every 1000 absolute disaster like Parkland or Uvalde there may be 1 nice story somewhere but its so rare and isolated it hardly matters

You know what’s not safe for mcps? Not having enough security. There are tons of serious incidents in mcps. Why do our kids need to feel unsafe in their schools because of people like you and their nonsense.

Nah the problem is parents that fail to instill values in their children. No amount of armed thugs will fix that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

every real incident shows they make schools less safe.

Google is your friend. Plenty of positive stories too.

For every 1000 absolute disaster like Parkland or Uvalde there may be 1 nice story somewhere but its so rare and isolated it hardly matters

You know what’s not safe for mcps? Not having enough security. There are tons of serious incidents in mcps. Why do our kids need to feel unsafe in their schools because of people like you and their nonsense.

Nah the problem is parents that fail to instill values in their children. No amount of armed thugs will fix that.

Both parents and MCPS/schools need to step up and fix this. MCPS has long pushed parents out of the schools and both are equally to blame.

So, without security, without consequences, what is it going to take for MCPS to step up? More rapes, more murders, more assaults? When is enough enough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

plus those were not in MoCo county. Not even in the same state.

The PP’s talking points are complete idiotic drivel.

Bring back the SROs.

Parkland and Uvalde happened in different states but the result is mostly always the same. SROs just don't work.

If the problem you are solving for is mass shootings by heavily armed mentally disturbed individuals, I agree with you that SROs do not work. If the problem you are trying to solve for is drug dealing and assaults on school property, SROs definitely help. I’m sure many of those kids got into the same trouble off school property but having police on property helped at least shift the location of the crime off campus. This allows kids that aren’t interested in that life to go to school without it being in their face. I think that’s a benefit. I’d love broader programs that solve the problem more generally but pushing it out of schools has some benefit for some kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

plus those were not in MoCo county. Not even in the same state.

The PP’s talking points are complete idiotic drivel.

Bring back the SROs.

Parkland and Uvalde happened in different states but the result is mostly always the same. SROs just don't work.

If the problem you are solving for is mass shootings by heavily armed mentally disturbed individuals, I agree with you that SROs do not work. If the problem you are trying to solve for is drug dealing and assaults on school property, SROs definitely help. I’m sure many of those kids got into the same trouble off school property but having police on property helped at least shift the location of the crime off campus. This allows kids that aren’t interested in that life to go to school without it being in their face. I think that’s a benefit. I’d love broader programs that solve the problem more generally but pushing it out of schools has some benefit for some kids.

It would be nice if the anti-security in the schools would come up with a real plan since their current plan not only failed but hurt many students and staff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

every real incident shows they make schools less safe.

Google is your friend. Plenty of positive stories too.

For every 1000 absolute disaster like Parkland or Uvalde there may be 1 nice story somewhere but its so rare and isolated it hardly matters

Not all good or bad make the news. You need a new talking point and stop risking the safety of our kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

every real incident shows they make schools less safe.

Google is your friend. Plenty of positive stories too.

For every 1000 absolute disaster like Parkland or Uvalde there may be 1 nice story somewhere but its so rare and isolated it hardly matters

Not all good or bad make the news. You need a new talking point and stop risking the safety of our kids.

The ones that are significant do and it's always bad news because SROs don't work and it's been shown they make schools less safe.