Rockville, another sanctuary city?

[Anonymous]

There will be a hearing on the proposal on March. Not sure how this will affect our daily life. Hope Rockville won't become another München.
http://washington.carpediem.cd/events/2546460-hearing-on-rockville-sanctuary-city-proposal-at-rockville-md-united-states/

[Anonymous]

MoCo has been sanctuary for years, so this hearing won't change much except the optics. You should know what you are talking about when trolling.

[Anonymous]

Has op been living under a rock?

[Anonymous]

Montgomery County is "not" a sanctuary jurisdiction. We turn folks over to ICE at the jail "if" ICE has a proper warrant/detainer with proper probable cause. Always have. Always will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Montgomery County is "not" a sanctuary jurisdiction. We turn folks over to ICE at the jail "if" ICE has a proper warrant/detainer with proper probable cause. Always have. Always will.

That does not eliminate it as a sanctuary city.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Montgomery County is "not" a sanctuary jurisdiction. We turn folks over to ICE at the jail "if" ICE has a proper warrant/detainer with proper probable cause. Always have. Always will.

That does not eliminate it as a sanctuary city.

Yes it does. First, there is no standard federal definition of a sanctuary city. Second, MoCo is in full compliance with federal law.

[Anonymous]

must see this on the Virginia's Legislative Information System page:
http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?171+sum+SB1262

SB 1262 Sanctuary cities; liability for certain injuries and damages caused by an illegal alien.

Introduced by: Richard H. Black

SUMMARY AS PASSED SENATE: (all summaries)

Liability of sanctuary cities for certain injuries and damages. Provides that a sanctuary city, defined in the bill as any locality that adopts any ordinance, procedure, or policy that intentionally restricts the enforcement of federal immigration laws to less than the full extent permitted by federal law, shall be jointly and severally liable for the tortious injury to persons or property caused by an illegal alien within such locality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Montgomery County is "not" a sanctuary jurisdiction. We turn folks over to ICE at the jail "if" ICE has a proper warrant/detainer with proper probable cause. Always have. Always will.

this:
http://cis.org/Sanctuary-Cities-Map

[Anonymous]

God I hope not crime is already getting worse!

[Anonymous]

What about the rights of those waiting in line and obeying the law? What about the rights of those who built this great country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What about the rights of those waiting in line and obeying the law? What about the rights of those who built this great country.

You mean immigrants? Agree we should let more immigrants in to build up this great country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about the rights of those waiting in line and obeying the law? What about the rights of those who built this great country.

You mean immigrants? Agree we should let more immigrants in to build up this great country.

Let more in legally, fine.
If you mean refuse to enforce our nation’s immigration laws, no.

BTW -- which part of the govt. makes the annual quota numbers for immigration, by country? Is that Congress or a government agency. I really don’t know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about the rights of those waiting in line and obeying the law? What about the rights of those who built this great country.

You mean immigrants? Agree we should let more immigrants in to build up this great country.

Let more in legally, fine.
If you mean refuse to enforce our nation’s immigration laws, no.

BTW -- which part of the govt. makes the annual quota numbers for immigration, by country? Is that Congress or a government agency. I really don’t know.

Get back to ironing your white hood, pig.

And there is no "country quota".

A legal way around this would be amnesty, as they did it under your beloved Reagan. No more tearing families apart, no more wasteful raids. But you wouldn't like that would you? Because in that instance, you'd have to let in more brown people. We can't have that can we?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about the rights of those waiting in line and obeying the law? What about the rights of those who built this great country.

You mean immigrants? Agree we should let more immigrants in to build up this great country.

Let more in legally, fine.
If you mean refuse to enforce our nation’s immigration laws, no.

BTW -- which part of the govt. makes the annual quota numbers for immigration, by country? Is that Congress or a government agency. I really don’t know.

Get back to ironing your white hood, pig.

And there is no "country quota".

A legal way around this would be amnesty, as they did it under your beloved Reagan. No more tearing families apart, no more wasteful raids. But you wouldn't like that would you? Because in that instance, you'd have to let in more brown people. We can't have that can we?

That was me, and I have seen a list of annual numbers of immigrants allowed by country. If the word “quota” offends, then use another word, like target or limits. We may allow in 200,000 from China, and 150,000 from India (not sure of the actual number, but really no need to be so insulting (white hood, pig? really?).

[Anonymous]

to answer the pp’s question, the number of "immigrant" visas available each year is set by Congress.