Usha Vance - Fashion Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's sad that on the White House bios page, there are head shots of Trump, Melania, and JD, but the photo of Usha is an AP photo taken from the Republican National Convention. That's how much of a rookie/unprepared she is for her role, she doesn't even have a headshot for the White House website.

She does indeed have a headshot on that page.

The single point of interest this dress/outfit has are those seams. That's it. So, with that being the focal point, you'd think someone would've cared enough about the one detail the dress had to pay attention to making sure it was correct.

My god. I would never in a million years have even noticed her seams. Never. Consider that this could be a you problem. It’s a great picture of her.
DP

+ a million
At first I thought the PP was satire - how incredibly absurd!! She looks beautiful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's sad that on the White House bios page, there are head shots of Trump, Melania, and JD, but the photo of Usha is an AP photo taken from the Republican National Convention. That's how much of a rookie/unprepared she is for her role, she doesn't even have a headshot for the White House website.

She does indeed have a headshot on that page.

The single point of interest this dress/outfit has are those seams. That's it. So, with that being the focal point, you'd think someone would've cared enough about the one detail the dress had to pay attention to making sure it was correct.

They used a hack photographer using a canned headshot pose. I have had my picture taken in this awkward pose - she is sitting on an uncomfortable stool, her body is seated with her knees pointing to the right, but her upper body is twisted slightly to face the photographer. She had no chance with that dress and this pose. A good photographer would have known better and taken the picture with her standing up. That doesn't excuse the color of her dress, but the pose is the reason the seams aren't straight and her breasts look crooked. I blame the photographer or whoever insisted she sit down for the headshot.

She is standing up in this picture.

No she is leaning against a stool.

No she is not. How would you even know that? She’s standing up straight.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's sad that on the White House bios page, there are head shots of Trump, Melania, and JD, but the photo of Usha is an AP photo taken from the Republican National Convention. That's how much of a rookie/unprepared she is for her role, she doesn't even have a headshot for the White House website.

She does indeed have a headshot on that page.

I know people were talking about how old she looks earlier, and I actually disagreed with them until now - up until now I thought she looked like she was in her late 30s, but in this picture she looks like a youthful 50 year old (she actually looks a lot like my sister, but my sister highlights her hair to get rid of the grays).

Yes, I’m not sure why she looks so old - most of my south Asian friends look so young - but she does.

It’s the bun on her hair. I think it’s aging especially in photos.

It’s the uneven skin tone, the wrinkles and lines and the gray hair. She looks 50.

So what? She's better looking than her husband.

I actually don't think she is, and he's nothing to write home about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's like they were aiming for this, but screwed up:

Headshot Pose 2: The 3/4 Angle
The 3/4 angle headshot pose is a variation of the classic, where instead of facing the camera directly, your body is turned slightly to one side. You can either look directly at the camera from an angle, or keep your gaze in the distance. This pose can add a sense of movement and dimension to the photograph, as well as creating a more dynamic and interesting composition.

For this pose, turn slightly to one side with your shoulders squared and your head still held high. For a business headshot we recommend looking directly into the camera lens, which can help establish a sense of connection and engagement with the viewer. Your arms can still be relaxed at your sides, in your pockets, or you can also try one arm placed on the hip or crossed over the chest. As usual, stand up straight, keep your shoulders back and your head can be tilted slightly upward, but not so much that it looks unnatural.

The 3/4 angle headshot pose is a great option for people who want to add a sense of movement and dimension. Depending on your expression and style, this pose can also convey a sense of energy and confidence, making it a good choice for actors, models, or anyone in a creative field looking for a more dynamic look.

OMG. You cannot be serious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

She needs to ditch the tans and browns. She would have looked better in the color her daughter wore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's sad that on the White House bios page, there are head shots of Trump, Melania, and JD, but the photo of Usha is an AP photo taken from the Republican National Convention. That's how much of a rookie/unprepared she is for her role, she doesn't even have a headshot for the White House website.

She does indeed have a headshot on that page.

I know people were talking about how old she looks earlier, and I actually disagreed with them until now - up until now I thought she looked like she was in her late 30s, but in this picture she looks like a youthful 50 year old (she actually looks a lot like my sister, but my sister highlights her hair to get rid of the grays).

Yes, I’m not sure why she looks so old - most of my south Asian friends look so young - but she does.

It’s the bun on her hair. I think it’s aging especially in photos.

It’s the uneven skin tone, the wrinkles and lines and the gray hair. She looks 50.

So what? She's better looking than her husband.

I actually don't think she is, and he's nothing to write home about.

Eye of the beholder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Cue the downplays and the naysayers. It's their second job now, and they are in it to win it.

Doesn't change what it is, though. You can shout down and insult posters here if you want, but people all over are still talking about it. A better use of the energy is just to get a stylist for formal appearances and do better.

All this frantic defense to make her feel better just makes her look more out of place and thin-skinned. Sad.

The only people insulting others are those who are calling her ugly and stupid, and those who are mocking anyone who dares to say she looks great (which she does). Maybe consider it is you who is grossly out of place for so vehemently criticizing someone who actually looks perfectly lovely. Don’t you have some seams of your own to obsess over?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's sad that on the White House bios page, there are head shots of Trump, Melania, and JD, but the photo of Usha is an AP photo taken from the Republican National Convention. That's how much of a rookie/unprepared she is for her role, she doesn't even have a headshot for the White House website.

She does indeed have a headshot on that page.

The single point of interest this dress/outfit has are those seams. That's it. So, with that being the focal point, you'd think someone would've cared enough about the one detail the dress had to pay attention to making sure it was correct.

They used a hack photographer using a canned headshot pose. I have had my picture taken in this awkward pose - she is sitting on an uncomfortable stool, her body is seated with her knees pointing to the right, but her upper body is twisted slightly to face the photographer. She had no chance with that dress and this pose. A good photographer would have known better and taken the picture with her standing up. That doesn't excuse the color of her dress, but the pose is the reason the seams aren't straight and her breasts look crooked. I blame the photographer or whoever insisted she sit down for the headshot.

She is standing up in this picture.

No she is leaning against a stool.

No she is not. How would you even know that? She’s standing up straight.
DP

She's definitely standing. Pp who pretends she is a portrait expert is just wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cue the downplays and the naysayers. It's their second job now, and they are in it to win it.

Doesn't change what it is, though. You can shout down and insult posters here if you want, but people all over are still talking about it. A better use of the energy is just to get a stylist for formal appearances and do better.

All this frantic defense to make her feel better just makes her look more out of place and thin-skinned. Sad.

Yep. No excuses for looking unpolished and messy.

That’s good, considering she didn’t/doesn’t. I’d love to see a photo of you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how long it will take before her friends that peruse this board tell her she needs a new headshot. I am confident that I am the reason the first one was replaced with a real headshot so quickly.

This just gets better and better. I’m sure you’re overly “confident” about a lot of things.

[Anonymous]

This thread has become totally boring with the arguing. I love the fashion commentary, and appreciate that everyone has different views (like the inaugural gown -- I can see having a difference of opinion on that, or the pink wool coat). But the person or people who just want to constantly repost that she should cover her greys (which she clearly doesn't want to do, so let's move on), and those who are arguing about whether it's even fair to discuss fashion, are ruing the whole thread.
#thisiswhywecan'thavefunthreads

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cue the downplays and the naysayers. It's their second job now, and they are in it to win it.

Doesn't change what it is, though. You can shout down and insult posters here if you want, but people all over are still talking about it. A better use of the energy is just to get a stylist for formal appearances and do better.

All this frantic defense to make her feel better just makes her look more out of place and thin-skinned. Sad.

Yep. No excuses for looking unpolished and messy.

That’s good, considering she didn’t/doesn’t. I’d love to see a photo of you.

Oh, I'm frumpy as hell. But game recognizes game (frump recognizes frump?).

There is no way I'd go in public like this at her level of notoriety, especially if I had her money and resources.

And miss me with "They aren't Trump wealthy!" He's a venture capitalist with a bestselling book he sold for movie rights and she's a big law partner. They aren't the podunk "Aw Shucks! We're just moving to DC to help folks like you!" couple from Cincinnati that they pretend to be. They don't even live in Cincinnati because Usha, salt of the earth that she is, said Ohio public schools weren't good enough for her kids. JD wrote an op-ed about this! They lived in Alexandria before the Vice Presidency!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cue the downplays and the naysayers. It's their second job now, and they are in it to win it.

Doesn't change what it is, though. You can shout down and insult posters here if you want, but people all over are still talking about it. A better use of the energy is just to get a stylist for formal appearances and do better.

All this frantic defense to make her feel better just makes her look more out of place and thin-skinned. Sad.

Yep. No excuses for looking unpolished and messy.

That’s good, considering she didn’t/doesn’t. I’d love to see a photo of you.

Agreed. She's the only one who looks like a normal human on that page. Trump looks like...Trump, FLOTUS is airbrushed beyond recognition and JD looks like he's holding in a fart. She's the only one who looks like she MIGHT be a decent person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The greys need to go though no just no!

I like the grey, refreshing.

Looking like crap isn’t refreshing.

She doesn’t look like crap. Damn, what is wrong with you?

+100
I would be thrilled to look like her!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cue the downplays and the naysayers. It's their second job now, and they are in it to win it.

Doesn't change what it is, though. You can shout down and insult posters here if you want, but people all over are still talking about it. A better use of the energy is just to get a stylist for formal appearances and do better.

All this frantic defense to make her feel better just makes her look more out of place and thin-skinned. Sad.

The only people insulting others are those who are calling her ugly and stupid, and those who are mocking anyone who dares to say she looks great (which she does). Maybe consider it is you who is grossly out of place for so vehemently criticizing someone who actually looks perfectly lovely. Don’t you have some seams of your own to obsess over?

Nobody called her stupid or ugly. They recommended she work with a stylist and a dermatologist. Both perfectly normal things to do as a person in the limelight like this. You’re taking this insanely personally. Why?