APS black student singled out to play cotton picking game

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any publicly available updates on this after the $10 million demand in early May? The letter sought a response in 30 days, which have now passed. Would like to know how APS is handling this given how much publicity it initially got. Interesting it’s been crickets since then—including no further comments from NAACP.

I heard several people raised the issue about the home address with many of the involved organizations. Apparently they do live in Arlington now but not until recently (they were using the aunts home address for years). It’s quite the conflict.

Any residency fraud is an accusation and really can’t be proven. The important thing that needs to be addressed is this racist incident this young boy suffered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any publicly available updates on this after the $10 million demand in early May? The letter sought a response in 30 days, which have now passed. Would like to know how APS is handling this given how much publicity it initially got. Interesting it’s been crickets since then—including no further comments from NAACP.

I heard several people raised the issue about the home address with many of the involved organizations. Apparently they do live in Arlington now but not until recently (they were using the aunts home address for years). It’s quite the conflict.

Did they establish residency after this event so they could sue?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any publicly available updates on this after the $10 million demand in early May? The letter sought a response in 30 days, which have now passed. Would like to know how APS is handling this given how much publicity it initially got. Interesting it’s been crickets since then—including no further comments from NAACP.

I heard several people raised the issue about the home address with many of the involved organizations. Apparently they do live in Arlington now but not until recently (they were using the aunts home address for years). It’s quite the conflict.

Did they establish residency after this event so they could sue?

I don’t think that’s how establishing residency works. If APS wants to demonstrate the family didn’t reside in the county, it should be a fairly straightforward process.

[Anonymous]

If the residency issue turns out to be nothing but hot air, I say the family walks away with a nice sum, but probably not all of what they requested. “C’est la vie” as they say in Quebec.

I don’t expect it to be public either. The family will be happy and APS frees itself from a costly legal fight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If the residency issue turns out to be nothing but hot air, I say the family walks away with a nice sum, but probably not all of what they requested. “C’est la vie” as they say in Quebec.

I don’t expect it to be public either. The family will be happy and APS frees itself from a costly legal fight.

That mom will never be happy. We've known her a long time.

[Anonymous]

This is what happens when you have different classes of people in the same school, the low class will be trying to get rich of fraud like this lawsuit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the residency issue turns out to be nothing but hot air, I say the family walks away with a nice sum, but probably not all of what they requested. “C’est la vie” as they say in Quebec.

I don’t expect it to be public either. The family will be happy and APS frees itself from a costly legal fight.

That mom will never be happy. We've known her a long time.

She shouldn’t be happy. Not sure about her, but my kids aren’t for sale.

The settlement will be undisclosed. When the girl got her hair cut at Immanuel Christian, they made her retract her statement publicly. They never even mentioned a settlement, but she wouldn’t need an attorney who specializes in settlements if she didn’t get one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is what happens when you have different classes of people in the same school, the low class will be trying to get rich of fraud like this lawsuit

The upper class is more likely to sue, than lower.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any publicly available updates on this after the $10 million demand in early May? The letter sought a response in 30 days, which have now passed. Would like to know how APS is handling this given how much publicity it initially got. Interesting it’s been crickets since then—including no further comments from NAACP.

I heard several people raised the issue about the home address with many of the involved organizations. Apparently they do live in Arlington now but not until recently (they were using the aunts home address for years). It’s quite the conflict.

Any residency fraud is an accusation and really can’t be proven. The important thing that needs to be addressed is this racist incident this young boy suffered.

It’s not hard to check where the parents had their cars registered and filed income taxes over the last ten years. It either matches the address he was registered under for school or it doesn’t.

The actual incident that wasn’t even racially motivated accounts for a very small portion of the kid’s suffering compared to what his mother has done to him with this insane demand letter and publicity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any publicly available updates on this after the $10 million demand in early May? The letter sought a response in 30 days, which have now passed. Would like to know how APS is handling this given how much publicity it initially got. Interesting it’s been crickets since then—including no further comments from NAACP.

I heard several people raised the issue about the home address with many of the involved organizations. Apparently they do live in Arlington now but not until recently (they were using the aunts home address for years). It’s quite the conflict.

Did they establish residency after this event so they could sue?

I don’t think that’s how establishing residency works. If APS wants to demonstrate the family didn’t reside in the county, it should be a fairly straightforward process.

Has the mom made high visibility public statements refuting the allegations of residency fraud? If the claims are false, I assume that would aid her complaint, contending that when she raised concerns about racism, the angry mob retaliated and tried to intimidate her by falsely accusing her of residency fraud. I’m not saying it’s required for her to publicly respond to the allegation, but it just strikes me as something that would bolster a claim of mistreatment and she would run with it if the accusations were false. Like earlier posters noted, residency fraud is fairly straightforward to prove or disprove.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any publicly available updates on this after the $10 million demand in early May? The letter sought a response in 30 days, which have now passed. Would like to know how APS is handling this given how much publicity it initially got. Interesting it’s been crickets since then—including no further comments from NAACP.

I heard several people raised the issue about the home address with many of the involved organizations. Apparently they do live in Arlington now but not until recently (they were using the aunts home address for years). It’s quite the conflict.

Did they establish residency after this event so they could sue?

I don’t think that’s how establishing residency works. If APS wants to demonstrate the family didn’t reside in the county, it should be a fairly straightforward process.

Has the mom made high visibility public statements refuting the allegations of residency fraud? If the claims are false, I assume that would aid her complaint, contending that when she raised concerns about racism, the angry mob retaliated and tried to intimidate her by falsely accusing her of residency fraud. I’m not saying it’s required for her to publicly respond to the allegation, but it just strikes me as something that would bolster a claim of mistreatment and she would run with it if the accusations were false. Like earlier posters noted, residency fraud is fairly straightforward to prove or disprove.

APS isn’t making this ridiculous allegation so there is nothing to refute. It’s the reachers and the white supremacists who want to downplay the racism in APS.

If APS were to make such a claim, they would be paying this family more money than they are already trying to settle for.

They are trying to work this out. I’m sure APS wants this to go away and we probably won’t hear anymore about this from either side of this incident, unless they can not come to an agreement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any publicly available updates on this after the $10 million demand in early May? The letter sought a response in 30 days, which have now passed. Would like to know how APS is handling this given how much publicity it initially got. Interesting it’s been crickets since then—including no further comments from NAACP.

I heard several people raised the issue about the home address with many of the involved organizations. Apparently they do live in Arlington now but not until recently (they were using the aunts home address for years). It’s quite the conflict.

Did they establish residency after this event so they could sue?

I don’t think that’s how establishing residency works. If APS wants to demonstrate the family didn’t reside in the county, it should be a fairly straightforward process.

Has the mom made high visibility public statements refuting the allegations of residency fraud? If the claims are false, I assume that would aid her complaint, contending that when she raised concerns about racism, the angry mob retaliated and tried to intimidate her by falsely accusing her of residency fraud. I’m not saying it’s required for her to publicly respond to the allegation, but it just strikes me as something that would bolster a claim of mistreatment and she would run with it if the accusations were false. Like earlier posters noted, residency fraud is fairly straightforward to prove or disprove.

APS isn’t making this ridiculous allegation so there is nothing to refute. It’s the reachers and the white supremacists who want to downplay the racism in APS.

If APS were to make such a claim, they would be paying this family more money than they are already trying to settle for.

They are trying to work this out. I’m sure APS wants this to go away and we probably won’t hear anymore about this from either side of this incident, unless they can not come to an agreement.

White supremacists? Just because APS wants this to go away doesn’t make it s valid claim. Are we talking about the same story here?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any publicly available updates on this after the $10 million demand in early May? The letter sought a response in 30 days, which have now passed. Would like to know how APS is handling this given how much publicity it initially got. Interesting it’s been crickets since then—including no further comments from NAACP.

I heard several people raised the issue about the home address with many of the involved organizations. Apparently they do live in Arlington now but not until recently (they were using the aunts home address for years). It’s quite the conflict.

Any residency fraud is an accusation and really can’t be proven. The important thing that needs to be addressed is this racist incident this young boy suffered.

It’s not hard to check where the parents had their cars registered and filed income taxes over the last ten years. It either matches the address he was registered under for school or it doesn’t.

The actual incident that wasn’t even racially motivated accounts for a very small portion of the kid’s suffering compared to what his mother has done to him with this insane demand letter and publicity.

Mom’s public traffic citations list a Maryland address. Pretty easy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any publicly available updates on this after the $10 million demand in early May? The letter sought a response in 30 days, which have now passed. Would like to know how APS is handling this given how much publicity it initially got. Interesting it’s been crickets since then—including no further comments from NAACP.

I heard several people raised the issue about the home address with many of the involved organizations. Apparently they do live in Arlington now but not until recently (they were using the aunts home address for years). It’s quite the conflict.

Did they establish residency after this event so they could sue?

I don’t think that’s how establishing residency works. If APS wants to demonstrate the family didn’t reside in the county, it should be a fairly straightforward process.

Has the mom made high visibility public statements refuting the allegations of residency fraud? If the claims are false, I assume that would aid her complaint, contending that when she raised concerns about racism, the angry mob retaliated and tried to intimidate her by falsely accusing her of residency fraud. I’m not saying it’s required for her to publicly respond to the allegation, but it just strikes me as something that would bolster a claim of mistreatment and she would run with it if the accusations were false. Like earlier posters noted, residency fraud is fairly straightforward to prove or disprove.

Who is this angry mob making allegations of residency fraud? The only place I've seen it is anon posters on AEM. I doubt the family even knows about it, and even if they did, usually best to not respond to anon internet haters.

[Anonymous]

sorry I mean DCUM not AEM