Obama Admin under pressure to provide "hacking" proof

[Anonymous]

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/312049-obama-under-pressure-to-prove-russian-interference-in-election#

When will this info be released? I know that classified info cannot be, but something definitive needs to be released to back up claims of hacking.

Obama said he told Putin to "cut it out," so let's see some proof.

[Anonymous]

"The administration up until now has provided little documentation to back up its official October assessment that the Russian government was attempting to interfere in the U.S. election.

Nor has it corroborated subsequent leaks from anonymous officials contending that the CIA believes the campaign was an attempt by Russian President Vladimir Putin to ensure Donald Trump’s victory."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"The administration up until now has provided little documentation to back up its official October assessment that the Russian government was attempting to interfere in the U.S. election.

Nor has it corroborated subsequent leaks from anonymous officials contending that the CIA believes the campaign was an attempt by Russian President Vladimir Putin to ensure Donald Trump’s victory."

This is bullshit, and repeating it over and over again does not make it any more true.

You can see the evidence yourself. It has been publicized by three private companies that investigated the DNC hack.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The administration up until now has provided little documentation to back up its official October assessment that the Russian government was attempting to interfere in the U.S. election.

Nor has it corroborated subsequent leaks from anonymous officials contending that the CIA believes the campaign was an attempt by Russian President Vladimir Putin to ensure Donald Trump’s victory."

This is bullshit, and repeating it over and over again does not make it any more true.

You can see the evidence yourself. It has been publicized by three private companies that investigated the DNC hack.

The quote is from the link provided. If you think The Hill is lying perhaps you should read the article and provide the proof to them so they can see it.

What firms are you citing? do you have links you can post here?

[Anonymous]

"Private security firms have provided more detailed forensic analysis linking two well-known Russian intelligence groups to the data breach at the DNC.

Beyond that, the evidence of Russian interference is compelling, though circumstantial."

So the Russians hacked the DNC, not the US election.

John Podesta got phished. He is apparently an idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"Private security firms have provided more detailed forensic analysis linking two well-known Russian intelligence groups to the data breach at the DNC.

Beyond that, the evidence of Russian interference is compelling, though circumstantial."

So the Russians hacked the DNC, not the US election.

John Podesta got phished. He is apparently an idiot.

The hack wasn't just a technological hack. The Russians didn't even need to digitally access or manipulate individual voting machines. What they did was social engineering, to use digital media to manipulate voter sentiment. The Russians have tremendous expertise in this area, they have been world class experts in the covert propaganda business for 70+ years, they quite successfully did it in Crimea, Eastern Ukraine and several other places in recent years.

[Anonymous]

Pressure from whom? What does he care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"Private security firms have provided more detailed forensic analysis linking two well-known Russian intelligence groups to the data breach at the DNC.

Beyond that, the evidence of Russian interference is compelling, though circumstantial."

So the Russians hacked the DNC, not the US election.

John Podesta got phished. He is apparently an idiot.

the old people in the dem party are absolute morons when it comes to use of technology.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The administration up until now has provided little documentation to back up its official October assessment that the Russian government was attempting to interfere in the U.S. election.

Nor has it corroborated subsequent leaks from anonymous officials contending that the CIA believes the campaign was an attempt by Russian President Vladimir Putin to ensure Donald Trump’s victory."

This is bullshit, and repeating it over and over again does not make it any more true.

You can see the evidence yourself. It has been publicized by three private companies that investigated the DNC hack.

The quote is from the link provided. If you think The Hill is lying perhaps you should read the article and provide the proof to them so they can see it.

What firms are you citing? do you have links you can post here?

I have posted the same information no fewer than five times on DCUM. This is easily obtainable information. Just google "how we know it was the russians".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The administration up until now has provided little documentation to back up its official October assessment that the Russian government was attempting to interfere in the U.S. election.

Nor has it corroborated subsequent leaks from anonymous officials contending that the CIA believes the campaign was an attempt by Russian President Vladimir Putin to ensure Donald Trump’s victory."

This is bullshit, and repeating it over and over again does not make it any more true.

You can see the evidence yourself. It has been publicized by three private companies that investigated the DNC hack.

The quote is from the link provided. If you think The Hill is lying perhaps you should read the article and provide the proof to them so they can see it.

What firms are you citing? do you have links you can post here?

I have posted the same information no fewer than five times on DCUM. This is easily obtainable information. Just google "how we know it was the russians".

But the burden of absolute proof is on our gov/Obama admin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Private security firms have provided more detailed forensic analysis linking two well-known Russian intelligence groups to the data breach at the DNC.

Beyond that, the evidence of Russian interference is compelling, though circumstantial."

So the Russians hacked the DNC, not the US election.

John Podesta got phished. He is apparently an idiot.

The hack wasn't just a technological hack. The Russians didn't even need to digitally access or manipulate individual voting machines. What they did was social engineering, to use digital media to manipulate voter sentiment. The Russians have tremendous expertise in this area, they have been world class experts in the covert propaganda business for 70+ years, they quite successfully did it in Crimea, Eastern Ukraine and several other places in recent years.

Now we add to the long list of why Hillary Clinton lost "social engineering."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The administration up until now has provided little documentation to back up its official October assessment that the Russian government was attempting to interfere in the U.S. election.

Nor has it corroborated subsequent leaks from anonymous officials contending that the CIA believes the campaign was an attempt by Russian President Vladimir Putin to ensure Donald Trump’s victory."

This is bullshit, and repeating it over and over again does not make it any more true.

You can see the evidence yourself. It has been publicized by three private companies that investigated the DNC hack.

The quote is from the link provided. If you think The Hill is lying perhaps you should read the article and provide the proof to them so they can see it.

What firms are you citing? do you have links you can post here?

I have posted the same information no fewer than five times on DCUM. This is easily obtainable information. Just google "how we know it was the russians".

But the burden of absolute proof is on our gov/Obama admin.

I don't care who provides the proof. It's there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Private security firms have provided more detailed forensic analysis linking two well-known Russian intelligence groups to the data breach at the DNC.

Beyond that, the evidence of Russian interference is compelling, though circumstantial."

So the Russians hacked the DNC, not the US election.

John Podesta got phished. He is apparently an idiot.

The hack wasn't just a technological hack. The Russians didn't even need to digitally access or manipulate individual voting machines. What they did was social engineering, to use digital media to manipulate voter sentiment. The Russians have tremendous expertise in this area, they have been world class experts in the covert propaganda business for 70+ years, they quite successfully did it in Crimea, Eastern Ukraine and several other places in recent years.

Now we add to the long list of why Hillary Clinton lost "social engineering."

Talking with people like you is about the same as talking to a kindergartner. A stubborn, ill-informed one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The administration up until now has provided little documentation to back up its official October assessment that the Russian government was attempting to interfere in the U.S. election.

Nor has it corroborated subsequent leaks from anonymous officials contending that the CIA believes the campaign was an attempt by Russian President Vladimir Putin to ensure Donald Trump’s victory."

This is bullshit, and repeating it over and over again does not make it any more true.

You can see the evidence yourself. It has been publicized by three private companies that investigated the DNC hack.

The quote is from the link provided. If you think The Hill is lying perhaps you should read the article and provide the proof to them so they can see it.

What firms are you citing? do you have links you can post here?

I have posted the same information no fewer than five times on DCUM. This is easily obtainable information. Just google "how we know it was the russians".

But the burden of absolute proof is on our gov/Obama admin.

I don't care who provides the proof. It's there.

Where?

[Anonymous]

35 Russians just got expelled from the US in connection to the hacking incidents. Someone's got proof.