Is there any basis for zodiac signs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tell me more. I'm very intrigued. I'm a female Aires married to a Leo. Our kids are Libra (female) and Sagitarius (male and female). Thanks!

Leo, Aries, and Sagittarius are all fire signs and get along well. The Libra might stick out a bit but should be the most rational and level headed of the bunch.

Thank you! Libra is very level-headed, indeed.

Or completely unbalanced. I find they are either super smart and successful with their endeavor, or over indulged who give or become unbalanced in people pleasing to their detriment.

[Anonymous]

I'm a Pisces sun with a Pisces moon and am very happy with my stable, level headed Virgo husband. My bff is also a Virgo- stable and dependable. Our kids are Gemini, Aries, and Sagittarius. Not sure how that's going to play out.

[Anonymous]

I'm a Gemini. My ex-husband is a Pisces. He's so laid-back that he's practically dead. That's a compliment. He is the most chill person I know. He's a great dad. He's also one of my dearest friends. We divorced because we decided that we worked better as friends, and I found someone who suits me far better than he ever did in marriage. My husband is also great friends with my ex. So I can't say how much your zodiac sign plays into things, but I can tell you that my Pisces is a great person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm a Pisces sun with a Pisces moon and am very happy with my stable, level headed Virgo husband. My bff is also a Virgo- stable and dependable. Our kids are Gemini, Aries, and Sagittarius. Not sure how that's going to play out.

That is so funny! Pisces woman here who used to date exclusively scorpios (and all my exes birthdays were within a week of each other) who now only dates Virgos. I don't do it on purpose, but there is such a sublime relationship and dialogue between Pisces and Virgo, such a lovely balance and also being similar in many ways (this is probably because Virgo is directly opposite Pisces on the zodiac wheel- in astrology, these things mean a lot). Totally blows the supposedly "soulmate-esque" relationship between Pisces and Scorpio (one of the fabled "great matches of the zodiac") out of the water!

As for Gemini, Aries, and Sagittarius kids- you are describing basically all my siblings and immediately family, who, I kid you not, all share the same rising sign, and are combos of those signs (and then there's me- full of water). (Another note- one of the coolest things to do is get birth charts for you whole family- it is amazing how the same signs will show up in the same places, kind of like inherited traits. Seriously, it's crazy) All I can say to you is- good luck! I found that I don't get on with those signs, but perhaps it will be different with the parent/sibling dynamic

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm a Gemini. My ex-husband is a Pisces. He's so laid-back that he's practically dead. That's a compliment. He is the most chill person I know. He's a great dad. He's also one of my dearest friends. We divorced because we decided that we worked better as friends, and I found someone who suits me far better than he ever did in marriage. My husband is also great friends with my ex. So I can't say how much your zodiac sign plays into things, but I can tell you that my Pisces is a great person.

Pisces are so laid back. I can totally go into chill mode and just not worry about a damn thing. I think that's why everyone in my life has always thought I was a stoner, even though I don't like to smoke. To the point where I've been gifted weed by strangers. It's definitely that pisces super-chillness coming through.

[Anonymous]

How many people are actually here talking like astrology is a thing?!

[Anonymous]

Hey, all you folks who claim astrology is based on exact science and mathematics, why don't you chew on this news. Not only has the earth's axis changed significantly since the zodiac system was invented, it was also modified to conveniently fit into our imperfect calendar.

http://www.today.com/popculture/your-life-lie-zodiac-has-changed-here-s-your-new-t103295

"The dates for the Western zodiac calendar have, it turns out, shifted, with each one starting later — like, a lot later. If you were a Capricorn born in early to mid-January, you're now a Sagittarius.

Cancers born in early to mid-July? Stop being such emotional cry-babies. You're actually Geminis.

The western zodiac has shifted, says NASA.
Oh, and there's a new 13th astrological sign now: Ophiuchus. Sounds like a "Matrix" character, we know. But those of you born between Nov. 29 to Dec. 17, you're all now Ophiuchus-es.

NASA broke the news early this year in a blog post that explained that when ancient Babylonians created the zodiac over 3,000 years ago, they wanted dates on the calendar to correspond with star constellations. But, there were 13 constellations, and they were working with a 12-month calendar. So they ditched Ophiuchus.

NASA also pointed out that the Earth's axis doesn't even point in the same direction as it did when the original constellations were drawn, so all our signs have different date ranges now anyway.

In other words: astrological chaos. And the science nerds at NASA don't even care that they've upended our lives. They released a statement last week explaining, "Here at NASA, we study astronomy, not astrology. We didn’t change any zodiac signs, we just did the math.”

Here are the brand-new astrological dates and signs, if you can bear to look.

Capricorn: Jan. 20 to Feb. 16

Aquarius: Feb. 16 to March 11

Pisces: March 11 to April 18

Aries: April 18 to May 13

Taurus: May 13 to June 21

Gemini: June 21 to July 20

Cancer: July 20 to Aug. 10

Leo: Aug. 10 to Sept. 16

Virgo: Sept. 16 to Oct. 30

Libra: Oct. 30 to Nov. 23

Scorpio: Nov. 23 to Nov. 29

Ophiuchus: Nov. 29 to Dec. 17

Sagittarius: Dec. 17 to Jan. 20"

[Anonymous]

As posted above, NASA determined we were all claiming the wrong zodiac signs anyway. It's such a bunch of garbage and not worth wasting your time or energy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As posted above, NASA determined we were all claiming the wrong zodiac signs anyway. It's such a bunch of garbage and not worth wasting your time or energy.

Wrong.
https://www.astrologyzone.com/the-nasa-controversy/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hey, all you folks who claim astrology is based on exact science and mathematics, why don't you chew on this news. Not only has the earth's axis changed significantly since the zodiac system was invented, it was also modified to conveniently fit into our imperfect calendar.

http://www.today.com/popculture/your-life-lie-zodiac-has-changed-here-s-your-new-t103295

"The dates for the Western zodiac calendar have, it turns out, shifted, with each one starting later — like, a lot later. If you were a Capricorn born in early to mid-January, you're now a Sagittarius.

Cancers born in early to mid-July? Stop being such emotional cry-babies. You're actually Geminis.

The western zodiac has shifted, says NASA.
Oh, and there's a new 13th astrological sign now: Ophiuchus. Sounds like a "Matrix" character, we know. But those of you born between Nov. 29 to Dec. 17, you're all now Ophiuchus-es.

NASA broke the news early this year in a blog post that explained that when ancient Babylonians created the zodiac over 3,000 years ago, they wanted dates on the calendar to correspond with star constellations. But, there were 13 constellations, and they were working with a 12-month calendar. So they ditched Ophiuchus.

NASA also pointed out that the Earth's axis doesn't even point in the same direction as it did when the original constellations were drawn, so all our signs have different date ranges now anyway.

In other words: astrological chaos. And the science nerds at NASA don't even care that they've upended our lives. They released a statement last week explaining, "Here at NASA, we study astronomy, not astrology. We didn’t change any zodiac signs, we just did the math.”

Here are the brand-new astrological dates and signs, if you can bear to look.

Capricorn: Jan. 20 to Feb. 16

Aquarius: Feb. 16 to March 11

Pisces: March 11 to April 18

Aries: April 18 to May 13

Taurus: May 13 to June 21

Gemini: June 21 to July 20

Cancer: July 20 to Aug. 10

Leo: Aug. 10 to Sept. 16

Virgo: Sept. 16 to Oct. 30

Libra: Oct. 30 to Nov. 23

Scorpio: Nov. 23 to Nov. 29

Ophiuchus: Nov. 29 to Dec. 17

Sagittarius: Dec. 17 to Jan. 20"

Well NOW it makes sense I always knew that b* was a Gemini, not a Cancer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As posted above, NASA determined we were all claiming the wrong zodiac signs anyway. It's such a bunch of garbage and not worth wasting your time or energy.

Wrong.
https://www.astrologyzone.com/the-nasa-controversy/

HAHAHAHA!! You expect anyone to believe "Astrology Zone" has it right and NASA is wrong. We're talking about the placement of constellations behind the sun. Naive fool.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As posted above, NASA determined we were all claiming the wrong zodiac signs anyway. It's such a bunch of garbage and not worth wasting your time or energy.

Wrong.
https://www.astrologyzone.com/the-nasa-controversy/

HAHAHAHA!! You expect anyone to believe "Astrology Zone" has it right and NASA is wrong. We're talking about the placement of constellations behind the sun. Naive fool.

LOL. Judging without reading the actual article. You have no idea about any of what you're talking about. But it's amusing to watch you try

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As posted above, NASA determined we were all claiming the wrong zodiac signs anyway. It's such a bunch of garbage and not worth wasting your time or energy.

Wrong.
https://www.astrologyzone.com/the-nasa-controversy/

I couldn't even make it through that very long posting before my bullshit meter blew it's top. If you read that whole thing and believe the crap that it's spewing, then I don't think NASA or any other person is ever going to change your mind. But, WOW, I can't believe you follow all that planetary energy baloney.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As posted above, NASA determined we were all claiming the wrong zodiac signs anyway. It's such a bunch of garbage and not worth wasting your time or energy.

Wrong.
https://www.astrologyzone.com/the-nasa-controversy/

HAHAHAHA!! You expect anyone to believe "Astrology Zone" has it right and NASA is wrong. We're talking about the placement of constellations behind the sun. Naive fool.

LOL. Judging without reading the actual article. You have no idea about any of what you're talking about. But it's amusing to watch you try

Sorry but it's unreadable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As posted above, NASA determined we were all claiming the wrong zodiac signs anyway. It's such a bunch of garbage and not worth wasting your time or energy.

Wrong.
https://www.astrologyzone.com/the-nasa-controversy/

I couldn't even make it through that very long posting before my bullshit meter blew it's top. If you read that whole thing and believe the crap that it's spewing, then I don't think NASA or any other person is ever going to change your mind. But, WOW, I can't believe you follow all that planetary energy baloney.

If you are so offended by zodiac signs, then I have no clue why you wandered into this thread. Clearly it's not for you and you don't believe it, congratulations- nobody cares.