I'm not trying to be snarky, but if EVERY child is special and unique, then isn't being "special and unique" simply "ordinary"? |
I honestly wish the pledge would be phased out - there are other ways to teach patriotism and love of country. Most people just recite it and don't even think about its meaning, which to me says it is really just empty words. And pledging allegiance to anything is...well, it is creepy.
Then you have the "under god" part that was added to show our supposed superiority to the "godless" communists but everyone claims is essential (bullshit...and the original pledge was written by an atheist) and the "liberty and justice FOR ALL" part (when we have lots of citizens who are NOT seen as equal). There is PLENTY wrong with the pledge, but I personally am not going to raise these things with my kid this young. I will let her think about it on her own time. I started thinking it was odd in elementary school all on my own. As for the "endowed by our creator" argument - if you know anything about history, you know that was just added for emphasis, right? The author didn't truly believe that shit. |
I'm in the second camp. My mother is blindly patriotic. Just who that pledge is meant to touch. She still thinks our nation's doing things like putting AMERICAN citizens of Japanese ancestry in interment camps in WWII was a good thing, and has mentioned its something we should consider for Muslim AMERICANS. That's exactly the type of blind patriotism that horrifies me. Just because it's the US doing it doesn't mean it's good. I'd much rather have a pledge to uphold the principles of the Constitution, which is a brilliant document. We only get ourselves in trouble when we go against its inherent principles. |
No. Just because uniqueness is widespread doesn't mean it becomes ordinary; it makes it a universal truth. Children (and people, everywhere) are all unique and special in different ways. Of course every child is special and unique. I don't understand why people think it's boastful or somehow arrogant for a parent to think of her child as special. Are there really parents out there who say to themselves, "my child is not special and unique, she is just ordinary"? |
I am one of the posters who objects to the pledge because of the words "under god." As to your example above, personally, I wouldn't be thrilled about this, because I think it's too much (and takes a lot longer than saying the short pledge). |
"The Incredibles" nailed this with Syndrome's line: "...and when EVERYONE is super, NO ONE will be." |
I'm not trying to make you "feel bad." I'm trying to point out the insanity of your position on this issue. |
Not quite - the pledge was written by a Baptist minister who was also a socialist. It's significant that a minister wrote the pledge and didn't feel it necessary to include a reference to a god. |
My mother taught there, so it was free for us kids. My family wasn't going to turn down a first-rate private school education that we otherwise could not have afforded. |
Atheists like you make me want to vomit - you disgust me that you are against your child even mentioning the word god.
How unfortunate that you want to take away her ability to have options and chose for herself what she believes when she is older. You are a terrible parent. PS - THANK YOU for living in DC - THANK YOU! One less atheist left wing loon in my town. |
This is ridiculous. All parents are supposed to teach their kids their family values. |
Well put! |
Your "values," or lack thereof, make me sick - where do they come from if not from God and the 10 commandments? Where? What is the basis of your values? The satanic bible? MSNBC? Whatever you feel like at the moment? Obviously, one of your values is to shield your children from God. CHEW ON THIS - Jesus said in the Bible that to turn people away from him and God is the ONLY UNFORGIVABLE SIN - the ONLY ONE - in other words, as a parent or human being, to turn your child away from God is the WORST SIN imaginable. |
With all due respect, your historical analysis is too shallow. The philosophical underpinnings of our country were based solidly on natural law; i.e., that some truths are universal, some rights inalienable, and justice transcendent of any particular regime, culture, or society. Without that conceptual framework, our country never would have existed. The author of the Declaration was a Deist. He believed in an absolute Authority. He knew that there needed to be an authority greater than any human being for his arguments to make sense. But it is not important what the founders personally believed; it is important what they collectively reasoned. |
Hmmm. My feeling was the main goal of this thread was to stir the pot, because the last thread about religion had just sunk off the first page. I'm always surprised at how some (not all) atheists are obsessed about their own atheism, and need to shove it in everyone else's faces, for example by keeping threads about their atheism going on DCUM. Anyway, the atheist kooks and religious kooks have come out to play. It certainly looks like OP succeeded.... |