I more thing before you call me racist, I am not white, I am a minority of mintorities, mixed race. I dont give a shit about what color the students are, I care about stats and scores. |
I for one think that focusing just on stats/scores is incredibly short-sighted. I don't dismiss them entirely but there's more to a school than stats/scores, unless you view children as robots who're fed information and are programmed to regurgitate it quickly and efficiently. |
That's all the more reason to be careful in considering to send your upper-income kid to a majority low-income school...their state test scores may look alright (due in no small part to what you do at home), but they may be missing out on a lot of the fundamental peer learning and reinforcement that their cohorts are benefitting from in schools with FARMS population in the 30% range or lower (i.e. reflecting the demographic range of the state and county itself). Kids thrive by emulating EVERYONE around them, not just the teachers, and I think that is where a majority low-income school founders, not just for the rich kids but also for the poor kids...really APS should re-structure school boundaries so that all school are no more than 1/3 FARMS...municipalities in other parts of the country have tested this and had great results for everyone...that would mean bussing kids around a little more and providing some county-wide equity.... |
Actually, it is commonly accepted that standardized tests are indeed, culture bound and are inherently biased to favor certain populations. So, no, your standardized test is not at all an agnostic measure of anyone's ability. |
I'm sorry but you sound like a complete snob. My guess is that you live in Arlington Forest. I have a lot of friend's who live there and send their children to Barrett and they will not put up with your stinky attitude. Get your head out of your ass. |
| There are more tools on this board than at a Stanley factory. |
I think it swings either way- I would say it's a perfectly legitimate choice for someone to choose not to send their kids to a Title I school they're home happens to be mapped to...that doesn't sound like the threshold for snobbery...likewise, perfectly fine to also be satisfied with a Title I school that has a rep for providing good education...I think you can swing either way and it's a fair personal choice... |
| Im just curious, since we are talking about Arlington, what do the people who wont send their kids to high FARMS schools think about schools like Key and Science Focus? These are popular with upper middle class white kids, but also have FARMS rates over 25%. Does the application process make those families more highly motivated to excel? |
|
Sci Focus is 20% FARMS, but it has some of the best test scores in Northern Virginia. Arlington Traditional has a high FARMS rate as well, but it also outperforms most Northern Virginia schools. At Key, the language immersion program is popular.
No one applies into Science Focus. It is a neighborhood school for families that don't want language immersion. It used to have a lottery for transfers from Taylor and Jamestown, the other team schools. But the school is a victim of its own popularity, and there is no room for transfers. Many of the middle class Mongolian American families in Arlington send their kids to Science Focus. |
How do you propose we determine student ability, ask their parents, psychic reading? |
25% is not too bad but at the upper limit, the original school is 50% which is awful. |