Shooting 4500 Wisconsin Avenue, possible student injured

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Where is the thread about the second (attempted?) shooting? Was that real? We are in a JR feeder and I don’t understand why this thread isn’t 10 pages long by now?

There was a 2nd shooting on the Chesapeake side of the Whole Foods garage

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JR has out of boundary kids who came in through feeders. As long as that’s the rule, families will get in. What actually matters here is that a kid was shot dead.

Schools can send kids back to their IB school if they have disciplinary or attendance issues. They should make better use of this.

That would just shift the problem. If anything they should be sending kids with severe disciplinary and attendance problems to specialized programs, not another regular school.

Sure that’s fine too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JR has out of boundary kids who came in through feeders. As long as that’s the rule, families will get in. What actually matters here is that a kid was shot dead.

Schools can send kids back to their IB school if they have disciplinary or attendance issues. They should make better use of this.

Why do you assume this kid had behavior issues? They usually don’t let people with severe issues participate in sports. You all have to remember that the people who killed him are likely his neighbors. Some kid in PG county got stabbed for his shoes last week, this literally could have been over anything.

For anyone who has a child in this class -there is a long history going back to Deal WRT to behavior
People are being polite here

What do you mean?

What do you think they mean?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:10-15 males running away from shooting site?

How disgusting

Males?

- that really narrows it down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JR has out of boundary kids who came in through feeders. As long as that’s the rule, families will get in. What actually matters here is that a kid was shot dead.

Schools can send kids back to their IB school if they have disciplinary or attendance issues. They should make better use of this.

That would just shift the problem. If anything they should be sending kids with severe disciplinary and attendance problems to specialized programs, not another regular school.

the program should be prison

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JR has out of boundary kids who came in through feeders. As long as that’s the rule, families will get in. What actually matters here is that a kid was shot dead.

Schools can send kids back to their IB school if they have disciplinary or attendance issues. They should make better use of this.

Why do you assume this kid had behavior issues? They usually don’t let people with severe issues participate in sports. You all have to remember that the people who killed him are likely his neighbors. Some kid in PG county got stabbed for his shoes last week, this literally could have been over anything.

For anyone who has a child in this class -there is a long history going back to Deal WRT to behavior
People are being polite here

What do you mean?

What do you think they mean?

If I knew what they meant, I wouldn't ask. How do we even know that Jackson Reed kids were responsible? Separately, there is nothing that suggests the deceased had any behavioral problems. So, yeah, it's kind of unclear. If there a behavioral problems with kids in the class, is the implication that kids in the class did this? If so, this also means that kids in the class are now attending school with a murderer. Is that you are saying? So, yeah, some clarification would be helpful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JR has out of boundary kids who came in through feeders. As long as that’s the rule, families will get in. What actually matters here is that a kid was shot dead.

Schools can send kids back to their IB school if they have disciplinary or attendance issues. They should make better use of this.

The perpetrators were likely not from JR. They had targeted Brady before. The question is why was he targeted? Seemed like he had a bright future.

Everything that is being said about this kid and prior issues is just rumor. My kid told me it was about some disagreement at that moment where the perpetrator decided to shoot and probably didn’t even know him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JR has out of boundary kids who came in through feeders. As long as that’s the rule, families will get in. What actually matters here is that a kid was shot dead.

Schools can send kids back to their IB school if they have disciplinary or attendance issues. They should make better use of this.

The perpetrators were likely not from JR. They had targeted Brady before. The question is why was he targeted? Seemed like he had a bright future.

Everything that is being said about this kid and prior issues is just rumor. My kid told me it was about some disagreement at that moment where the perpetrator decided to shoot and probably didn’t even know him.

To your point, that’s just another rumor unless your kid was there. My kid wasn’t there and heard initially he was shot in the leg by the kids who beat him up last year and would be fine. Would be great if the school and MPD could address some of these issues with the school community.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain why the principal didn’t mention gun violence? Is it a legal thing?

It’s a woke thing.

FFS. I cannot let this slide. The GOP , starting with McCain, has routinely overridden DC voters’ efforts to restrict guns. In fact this past December the TRUMP’s Justice Dept challenged laws aimed at popular rifles including the AR-15 in the nation's capital.

So, woke people’s anti-gun work is routinely overruled by violent MAGA.

NP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain why the principal didn’t mention gun violence? Is it a legal thing?

It’s a woke thing.

FFS. I cannot let this slide. The GOP , starting with McCain, has routinely overridden DC voters’ efforts to restrict guns. In fact this past December the TRUMP’s Justice Dept challenged laws aimed at popular rifles including the AR-15 in the nation's capital.

So, woke people’s anti-gun work is routinely overruled by violent MAGA.

NP.

It only works if you follow the rules. I gather these upstanding gentlemen had no problem with breaking the law.

[Anonymous]

https://www.wusa9.com/video/news/crime/jackson-reed-high-school-football-coach-mourns-senior-after-shooting/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain why the principal didn’t mention gun violence? Is it a legal thing?

It’s a woke thing.

FFS. I cannot let this slide. The GOP , starting with McCain, has routinely overridden DC voters’ efforts to restrict guns. In fact this past December the TRUMP’s Justice Dept challenged laws aimed at popular rifles including the AR-15 in the nation's capital.

So, woke people’s anti-gun work is routinely overruled by violent MAGA.

NP.

It only works if you follow the rules. I gather these upstanding gentlemen had no problem with breaking the law.

Yep: quite a stretch to blame GOP for this endemic dysfunction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.wusa9.com/video/news/crime/jackson-reed-high-school-football-coach-mourns-senior-after-shooting/

The link 404s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JR has out of boundary kids who came in through feeders. As long as that’s the rule, families will get in. What actually matters here is that a kid was shot dead.

Schools can send kids back to their IB school if they have disciplinary or attendance issues. They should make better use of this.

That would just shift the problem. If anything they should be sending kids with severe disciplinary and attendance problems to specialized programs, not another regular school.

the program should be prison

Prison is not the answer. Some people think it is but you are creating a violent criminal by doing this. If you address the issues that teenagers face: poverty, poor parenting etc. Society could solve the problem. Throwing teens away in prison just creates more problems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JR has out of boundary kids who came in through feeders. As long as that’s the rule, families will get in. What actually matters here is that a kid was shot dead.

Schools can send kids back to their IB school if they have disciplinary or attendance issues. They should make better use of this.

Why do you assume this kid had behavior issues? They usually don’t let people with severe issues participate in sports. You all have to remember that the people who killed him are likely his neighbors. Some kid in PG county got stabbed for his shoes last week, this literally could have been over anything.

For anyone who has a child in this class -there is a long history going back to Deal WRT to behavior
People are being polite here

What do you mean?

What do you think they mean?

If I knew what they meant, I wouldn't ask. How do we even know that Jackson Reed kids were responsible? Separately, there is nothing that suggests the deceased had any behavioral problems. So, yeah, it's kind of unclear. If there a behavioral problems with kids in the class, is the implication that kids in the class did this? If so, this also means that kids in the class are now attending school with a murderer. Is that you are saying? So, yeah, some clarification would be helpful.

You sound really naive but I will spell it out. The implication is that the deceased was a rough kid involved in crew gripes and got shot. If he was an innocent bystander we would know that by now.