First, thanks for these details! NP to this thread. Not sure whether you are the same poster who provided the FIFA rules and breakdown in the DCU thread but it helped me understand how current American families are currently overseas without dual citizenship and I appreciate it. Three questions as our plan is to get overseas: 1) How early are we talking in terms of making the move? 2) My kid has remained competitive internationally over the years but I hear there is a separation period around 14-16. What is happening overseas that we can’t try to replicate here? I know many people jump to 11v11 too quickly and start focusing on tactics and endurance versus technique but we have managed to stay away from those environments. 3) Have any parents chosen to pay an MLS academy the training costs to retain their players rights? I am in the fortunate position that I afford the training. My biggest fear is the profit motives of a MLS club jamming up my kids opportunity with these development fees as described. Any insight is appreciated. |
You have inside information on the conversations and decision making of Manchester City and the Sullivan family? Does him being Under 16 at the time of the original deal have something to do with the timing of his move to City? Man City is flush with money. Giving Philly Union some chump change is not even a blip to them. They will have to pay compensation to any players coming from an academy that's not theirs, American or not. |
Yes I am the same poster who posted all the info about FIFA transfer rules in the DCU thread as well. You're asking all the right questions. Here is my breakdown for each one: 1. How early?: My view is that it depends on how likely it is for your son to separate himself from his peers on the target team. Much easier to do this at u9-u13. It' gets harder after that because puberty is kicking in and the competition becomes stiffer. Plus, at those early years, the US is actually on par or in some instances better at individual development than some of the clubs overseas especially when it comes to creativity and bravery on the ball. But the players overseas often times have better core fundamentals. To stand out you need both. I would say target years are u9-u13 or u14. If after those years you need a special player and special circumstances at the target club to break through (ie maybe they are struggling at that age group, maybe they don't have depth at at the position your son plays etc). Also, consider the playing philosophy of the club. This is often overlooked for the name brand only. If your son isn't not aggressive defensively and you go to a club where intense pressing is part of their DNA then he will struggle. .Conversely, if your player is creative and likes the ball at his feet, think about systems that value high percentages of possession and off the ball movement. 2. Why Europe separates at u14-u16. This is an important issue. The main reason from my point of view is that US kids focus a lot on balls skills with low pressure and low intensity and skills that are low value and low probability in intense games. The result of this is that you'll have a player that can do decently on the ball but they can't really do anything else that well. And considering a player has the ball substantially less than they are off the ball, this is a glaring hole in the way the US develops players. These are the ages where poor fundamentals, lack of game understanding and lack of defensive understanding really get exposed. Europe replicates game scenarios at extremely high intensity at rapid intervals. This creates muscle memory and quicker recognition of the scenarios and the actions that the scenarios require and the technical skills that is needed from the player to execute. In the US we need more training systems that focus on ALL OUT intensity at all times and pressure, constant pressure. When US kids come to Europe the first thing that stands out is that they say the speed of play is faster. If they came and the speed of play was the same as they have always been training they would be at an advantage not a disadvantage to start. Stop doing so many cone drills and focus on game speed reps at skills your position demands. And always focus on first touch under intense pressure. Players stand out for making messy play organized again with their calm and touch making a bad ball a good one. Jumping to 11v11 too early and playing up is an ego thing in the US. U14s in Europe are still mostly playing 9v9 because the speed of thought and tough rate is just higher. Don't speed into 11v11. Your kid will have his whole life to play 11v11 but only 4 years to play 9v9. Use those years wisely and focus on the fundamentals. The skills needed at 11v11 are very different than 9v9 and the premium on passing accuracy and covering ground becomes higher. Again something we don't stress in the US. Lastly, a lot of players fail at these ages because they or their parents think they can only play one position. You are most valuable as a player the more positions you can play. Period. If you go to an academy and they have three strikers already and you're a striker they will ask, can you play any place else and if your answer is no, not good. At these ages the European kids have been playing everywhere and their game intelligence shows this. Play more positions at youth ages to garner a better understanding of the game. 3. Paying the training comp out of pocket. It is something that I have seen people try for sure and it really does depend on the club, their front office and how they do business. It's too hard to say yea or nea on this because every club is different. But it is absolutely something I would ask ALL clubs before you enter and get their response IN WRITING saying they relinquish their rights to training comp. Most won't do it because it just isn't in their best interest. But you never know, some might. It's still relatively early days of training comp in the MLS so anything is possible. But again, low probability. |
You're saying the club in Germany signed Weston McKennie at 18 from FC Dallas only because it was a free transfer? No other better 17 or 18 year old in Europe was available? Same for Pulisic and the others |
I don't need inside information. It's public and obvious. no, the fact that he was under 16 doesn't matter, if the player is good enough, they find a way. Sullivan has a EU passport as well which makes it even easier. Sullivan will be 16 this month and if it mattered.thst he was under 16 at signing (with Philly btw not city) he would.be going to city then, which he clearly is not. What is your point about Philly Union? I'm not talking about the money. I'm talking about the fact that they, city, took a wait and see approach as opposed to bringing him in right away which was not happening a decade ago under different USSF rules. Your chump change argument just supports my argument. If it is chump change why not just sign him straight up. |
That's right. No other better 17 or 18 year old was available FOR FREE. Schalke would.have to pay for them. Same.for Pulisic. Why not take these guys then? They cost the club absolutely nothing and have tremendous upside potential. The German players cost them something at 18 yrs and on that alone the upside is not as high. You nare vastly underestimating the value of a completely free transfer in global football. With no fees attached whatsoever. It is like.gold. |
I'll go out on a very thick limb to say neither of us knows the details and nuances behind the Sullivan to Man City negotiations. Some things seems obvious on the surface to outsiders but are clearly being interpreted with subconscious bias As for wait and see, he's only 15 Its not a crazy approach if thats the case Aren't their legal and contractual UEFA and FIFA and FA rules for 16 and 18 years old? |
Be serious man All the available players from Africa, South America, Europe and Asia at 17+ and they chose the US boys just because they're free transfer? These fees are negotiated and paid every day by these clubs. Cost of doing business. Free is nice but not a showstopper for the right fit talent |
How do you explain all the American kids with dual citizenship currently at top European academies? Why couldn't Sullivan just go like they did? |
I am a parent learning this system and some of you are blocking a quality conversation because you are not in the mix. When we trained in Germany, there were alot of Africans in the academy systems. Youtube Laliga FC futures and watch Espanol vs. Real Madrid a few months ago. Do you really think there are that many germans and spaniards of African descent magically living Wolfsburg and Barcelona? These clubs will look for the cheapest routes to acquire talent and the US is no longer one as US Soccer and the MLS matures and develops. Those opportunities are now going to the African's if that African is free and your MLS academy player has a fee (assuming the two players are equivalent). If you think these clubs have not mastered the art of working through the FIFA rules then you don't believe Steve Balmer paid Leonard $28m through a shell company to circumvent the NBA salary cap which is soooooo obvious and I have flying car to sell you. Why do you think these new FIFA rules came about? This is a hard core business not too different than child trafficking if you don't have guardrails up. Clubs have been pumping and dumping kids for years, especially those coming from 3rd world countries. That is the beauty of our US system at times because at least you get a college degree for your talent. The soccer world is different and we need to drop our egos and learn the system so we can help our kids. These clubs don't like paying $169m (Isak transfer fee in $) for a player when you can have a development pipeline for 1/10 of the cost. 5% of $169m = $8,450,000 to the clubs who invested in Isak as a youth (idk for sure, just generally speaking). That is a lot of money for an MLS franchise and the MLS franchises now understand that. MLS academies are not free. You are an asset to them with a value. They control you. This conversation is about allowing us parents to control the future of our kids. I can choose to give up control to DCU or any other academy if I deem the value of the training is higher than I can pay for separately or I can choose to pay to train my kid and stay clear of giving up that control until I get to the right academy. Make no mistake. We will give up control at some point. The terms "buy" and "sell" a player are used for a reason. Stop nitpicking details, appreciate the conversation and learn the system. |
There are kids of African decent who hold European passports in the academy system pre 18 years old. That's not the conversation Kids after 16 go to Cat 1 academies in England from other European countries and the originating academy is compensated based on how long they developed the kid. They also compensate kids coming from Cat 2 and Cat 3 academies or Grass Roots to Chelsea for example. Regularly and consistently. If a player is the right prospect and free, they'll also take him. I love your ego in assuming you are the one and only knowledgeable one, on an anonymous forum. |
One of my kids participated in the DCU RDS back in 2017/18 when it was still running. We found it to be worthwhile supplemental training; I was bummed when they subsequently cancelled it. Glad to see it's coming back. |
This is where you don't understand the system... |
Finally someone else that gets it... |
What is your point??? |