JK Rowling hate law posts not criminal, police say

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s simply speaking out against men who decided they’re women to get into women’s spaces. Women’s prisons, women’s shelters, keeping sex offenders away from women and girls, and men/boys out of women’s/girls sports. And being able to keep the freedom of speech to do so.

I applaud her for not towing the (celebrity) company line, pretending it’s okay.

+ 1

She's a true feminist, not to mention one of the few self-made billionaires, a philanthropist, and a brave BAMF. One of the most inspirational women alive.

And using her platform to spread anti-trans hate.

No, she's not doing that. Nor is she "stirring up hate". She is being controversial and, apparently, offensive. Not the same thing.

Of course she is.

“ "She listed me and some other trans people along with some sex offenders and put it out to 14 million of her followers.
"That was inciting hatred and it resulted in me receiving thousands of messages of hate. So it's done what she set out for it to do."
Ms Neeves said the story had been published all over the world and was "all misinformation about me".
She added: "It's horrible and it's really harmful."”

Hysterical! So this trans person thinks that they have received more messages of hate than JK Rowling has? Do you realize how many trans women attack JK over and over again?

Seems like she gets back what she puts out.

Or, you know, vice versa.

She started pushing the hate. She wasn’t randomly targeted.

She started a women's shelter long before any "hate" started. She did start to speak up about minors being quickly transitioned and caused the investigation and eventual closure of Tavistock clinic. Maybe that's what you mean?

She started attacking the transgender community.

Here is the history since you seem unaware:
https://www.glamour.com/story/a-complete-breakdown-of-the-jk-rowling-transgender-comments-controversy

No one forced her to make those comments publicly. That’s 100% on her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the women here calling JKR a hateful bigot and bully: Would you be comfortable at a women's clothing optional spa with trans women? A women's shelter? A prison?

Hint: it’s not women calling her a bigot

Hint: it’s not good to make ASSumptions

[Anonymous]

Ridiculous non-news. Leave this author alone. Have YOU done anything nearly as meaningful in your life?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s simply speaking out against men who decided they’re women to get into women’s spaces. Women’s prisons, women’s shelters, keeping sex offenders away from women and girls, and men/boys out of women’s/girls sports. And being able to keep the freedom of speech to do so.

I applaud her for not towing the (celebrity) company line, pretending it’s okay.

+ 1

She's a true feminist, not to mention one of the few self-made billionaires, a philanthropist, and a brave BAMF. One of the most inspirational women alive.

And using her platform to spread anti-trans hate.

No, she's not doing that. Nor is she "stirring up hate". She is being controversial and, apparently, offensive. Not the same thing.

Of course she is.

“ "She listed me and some other trans people along with some sex offenders and put it out to 14 million of her followers.
"That was inciting hatred and it resulted in me receiving thousands of messages of hate. So it's done what she set out for it to do."
Ms Neeves said the story had been published all over the world and was "all misinformation about me".
She added: "It's horrible and it's really harmful."”

Hysterical! So this trans person thinks that they have received more messages of hate than JK Rowling has? Do you realize how many trans women attack JK over and over again?

Seems like she gets back what she puts out.

Or, you know, vice versa.

She started pushing the hate. She wasn’t randomly targeted.

She started a women's shelter long before any "hate" started. She did start to speak up about minors being quickly transitioned and caused the investigation and eventual closure of Tavistock clinic. Maybe that's what you mean?

She started attacking the transgender community.

Here is the history since you seem unaware:
https://www.glamour.com/story/a-complete-breakdown-of-the-jk-rowling-transgender-comments-controversy

No one forced her to make those comments publicly. That’s 100% on her.

So she said that transgender women are men. And that people who menstruate are women.

Where’s the hate speech exactly? Still waiting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s simply speaking out against men who decided they’re women to get into women’s spaces. Women’s prisons, women’s shelters, keeping sex offenders away from women and girls, and men/boys out of women’s/girls sports. And being able to keep the freedom of speech to do so.

I applaud her for not towing the (celebrity) company line, pretending it’s okay.

+ 1

She's a true feminist, not to mention one of the few self-made billionaires, a philanthropist, and a brave BAMF. One of the most inspirational women alive.

And using her platform to spread anti-trans hate.

No, she's not doing that. Nor is she "stirring up hate". She is being controversial and, apparently, offensive. Not the same thing.

Of course she is.

“ "She listed me and some other trans people along with some sex offenders and put it out to 14 million of her followers.
"That was inciting hatred and it resulted in me receiving thousands of messages of hate. So it's done what she set out for it to do."
Ms Neeves said the story had been published all over the world and was "all misinformation about me".
She added: "It's horrible and it's really harmful."”

Hysterical! So this trans person thinks that they have received more messages of hate than JK Rowling has? Do you realize how many trans women attack JK over and over again?

Seems like she gets back what she puts out.

Or, you know, vice versa.

She started pushing the hate. She wasn’t randomly targeted.

She started a women's shelter long before any "hate" started. She did start to speak up about minors being quickly transitioned and caused the investigation and eventual closure of Tavistock clinic. Maybe that's what you mean?

She started attacking the transgender community.

Here is the history since you seem unaware:
https://www.glamour.com/story/a-complete-breakdown-of-the-jk-rowling-transgender-comments-controversy

No one forced her to make those comments publicly. That’s 100% on her.

Her comments in 2020 were not offensive ("people who menstruate" is just an obnoxious construction, she was right about that) - it was a crazy time when everyone was already crazy from the shutdowns and the pandemic.

She received so much hate mail from those comments that she went on the offensive and hasn't really stopped. I have friends who hate her - I admire her conviction that women are women and her guts to say it. Just think about that for a minute. You have to be a billionaire to be able to say that women are women - and even then you are investigated by the police for it.

[Anonymous]

NP. JKR is a hero. She could have just silently stood by in the face of the assault on women’s safety, health, and dignity that is the current transgender movement. Instead she has spoken up, putting herself in the line of entitled and angry male fire to protect the women prisoners being raped by their trans cellmates, the female rape victims forced to prostrate themselves in Scotland before Mridul Wadhwa’s enormous ego, and the girls forced to swallow their fears about predators in their safe spaces. What’s the phrase that Wadhwa used about rape victim afraid of male bodies? “Reframe their trauma” so she can be validated at the expense of rape victims? GTFO.

I’m sick and tired of this misogynist men’s rights religious movement destroying the safety and boundaries of girls and women. Good for JKR for speaking truth when others cannot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NP. JKR is a hero. She could have just silently stood by in the face of the assault on women’s safety, health, and dignity that is the current transgender movement. Instead she has spoken up, putting herself in the line of entitled and angry male fire to protect the women prisoners being raped by their trans cellmates, the female rape victims forced to prostrate themselves in Scotland before Mridul Wadhwa’s enormous ego, and the girls forced to swallow their fears about predators in their safe spaces. What’s the phrase that Wadhwa used about rape victim afraid of male bodies? “Reframe their trauma” so she can be validated at the expense of rape victims? GTFO.

I’m sick and tired of this misogynist men’s rights religious movement destroying the safety and boundaries of girls and women. Good for JKR for speaking truth when others cannot.

Plus one million.

In fact, I don’t know any biological woman who doesn’t privately agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s simply speaking out against men who decided they’re women to get into women’s spaces. Women’s prisons, women’s shelters, keeping sex offenders away from women and girls, and men/boys out of women’s/girls sports. And being able to keep the freedom of speech to do so.

I applaud her for not towing the (celebrity) company line, pretending it’s okay.

+ 1

She's a true feminist, not to mention one of the few self-made billionaires, a philanthropist, and a brave BAMF. One of the most inspirational women alive.

And using her platform to spread anti-trans hate.

No, she's not doing that. Nor is she "stirring up hate". She is being controversial and, apparently, offensive. Not the same thing.

Of course she is.

“ "She listed me and some other trans people along with some sex offenders and put it out to 14 million of her followers.
"That was inciting hatred and it resulted in me receiving thousands of messages of hate. So it's done what she set out for it to do."
Ms Neeves said the story had been published all over the world and was "all misinformation about me".
She added: "It's horrible and it's really harmful."”

Hysterical! So this trans person thinks that they have received more messages of hate than JK Rowling has? Do you realize how many trans women attack JK over and over again?

Seems like she gets back what she puts out.

Or, you know, vice versa.

She started pushing the hate. She wasn’t randomly targeted.

She started a women's shelter long before any "hate" started. She did start to speak up about minors being quickly transitioned and caused the investigation and eventual closure of Tavistock clinic. Maybe that's what you mean?

She started attacking the transgender community.

Here is the history since you seem unaware:
https://www.glamour.com/story/a-complete-breakdown-of-the-jk-rowling-transgender-comments-controversy

No one forced her to make those comments publicly. That’s 100% on her.

So she said that transgender women are men. And that people who menstruate are women.

Where’s the hate speech exactly? Still waiting.

Misgendering, deadnaming, lumping together transgender people with criminals, etc.

Standard TERF hate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. JKR is a hero. She could have just silently stood by in the face of the assault on women’s safety, health, and dignity that is the current transgender movement. Instead she has spoken up, putting herself in the line of entitled and angry male fire to protect the women prisoners being raped by their trans cellmates, the female rape victims forced to prostrate themselves in Scotland before Mridul Wadhwa’s enormous ego, and the girls forced to swallow their fears about predators in their safe spaces. What’s the phrase that Wadhwa used about rape victim afraid of male bodies? “Reframe their trauma” so she can be validated at the expense of rape victims? GTFO.

I’m sick and tired of this misogynist men’s rights religious movement destroying the safety and boundaries of girls and women. Good for JKR for speaking truth when others cannot.

Plus one million.

In fact, I don’t know any biological woman who doesn’t privately agree.

You must not know that many women.

She’s a bigot who spreads hate on her platform.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. JKR is a hero. She could have just silently stood by in the face of the assault on women’s safety, health, and dignity that is the current transgender movement. Instead she has spoken up, putting herself in the line of entitled and angry male fire to protect the women prisoners being raped by their trans cellmates, the female rape victims forced to prostrate themselves in Scotland before Mridul Wadhwa’s enormous ego, and the girls forced to swallow their fears about predators in their safe spaces. What’s the phrase that Wadhwa used about rape victim afraid of male bodies? “Reframe their trauma” so she can be validated at the expense of rape victims? GTFO.

I’m sick and tired of this misogynist men’s rights religious movement destroying the safety and boundaries of girls and women. Good for JKR for speaking truth when others cannot.

Plus one million.

In fact, I don’t know any biological woman who doesn’t privately agree.

Same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. JKR is a hero. She could have just silently stood by in the face of the assault on women’s safety, health, and dignity that is the current transgender movement. Instead she has spoken up, putting herself in the line of entitled and angry male fire to protect the women prisoners being raped by their trans cellmates, the female rape victims forced to prostrate themselves in Scotland before Mridul Wadhwa’s enormous ego, and the girls forced to swallow their fears about predators in their safe spaces. What’s the phrase that Wadhwa used about rape victim afraid of male bodies? “Reframe their trauma” so she can be validated at the expense of rape victims? GTFO.

I’m sick and tired of this misogynist men’s rights religious movement destroying the safety and boundaries of girls and women. Good for JKR for speaking truth when others cannot.

Plus one million.

In fact, I don’t know any biological woman who doesn’t privately agree.

Same.

Guess those TERFs like to stick together.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. JKR is a hero. She could have just silently stood by in the face of the assault on women’s safety, health, and dignity that is the current transgender movement. Instead she has spoken up, putting herself in the line of entitled and angry male fire to protect the women prisoners being raped by their trans cellmates, the female rape victims forced to prostrate themselves in Scotland before Mridul Wadhwa’s enormous ego, and the girls forced to swallow their fears about predators in their safe spaces. What’s the phrase that Wadhwa used about rape victim afraid of male bodies? “Reframe their trauma” so she can be validated at the expense of rape victims? GTFO.

I’m sick and tired of this misogynist men’s rights religious movement destroying the safety and boundaries of girls and women. Good for JKR for speaking truth when others cannot.

Plus one million.

In fact, I don’t know any biological woman who doesn’t privately agree.

Same.

Same. Most men too, even liberals.

However “progressive” men are almost universally the first to call women “bigots” when they say transgender women are men.

[Anonymous]

She predicted by loosening laws that now say anyone who merely verbally identifies as a woman is a woman entitled to enter any female only space it is going to cause problems and be unsafe for women.

So now a man who is registered sex offender can enter a Korean spa and get naked around girls and women.

Men who have sexually assaulted women and girls can declare they are women and be sent to women prisons.

People who have gone through puberty as males then transition can blow the competition away competing against females.

The obnoxious thing about Nevis is they transitioned at age 48 around 2019 and then were chosen as a “UN Women UK delegate to the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women.” After 4 years they get to represent the status of women?!!! 4 years? There are 30 million women in the UK to choose from. This is why feminists get so upset. Show me where someone who transitioned to being male is representing males after 4 years. Men wouldn’t put up with it. Only women are told to move aside.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s simply speaking out against men who decided they’re women to get into women’s spaces. Women’s prisons, women’s shelters, keeping sex offenders away from women and girls, and men/boys out of women’s/girls sports. And being able to keep the freedom of speech to do so.

I applaud her for not towing the (celebrity) company line, pretending it’s okay.

+ 1

She's a true feminist, not to mention one of the few self-made billionaires, a philanthropist, and a brave BAMF. One of the most inspirational women alive.

And using her platform to spread anti-trans hate.

Only if you consider it anti-trans hate to say that transwomen are human males, aka men.

It also happens to be truth.

Bigots love to misgender.

It’s not bigotry, it’s biology. You know, science.

Sex <> gender

For decades, we tried to say that sex and gender are separate constructs. Trans people finally allowed us to acknowledge that they are the same - that is why trans people want surgery, to make them the same.

Gender affirmation surgery…

If gender is a social construct, like you all claim, what is there to affirm?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She predicted by loosening laws that now say anyone who merely verbally identifies as a woman is a woman entitled to enter any female only space it is going to cause problems and be unsafe for women.

So now a man who is registered sex offender can enter a Korean spa and get naked around girls and women.

Men who have sexually assaulted women and girls can declare they are women and be sent to women prisons.

People who have gone through puberty as males then transition can blow the competition away competing against females.

The obnoxious thing about Nevis is they transitioned at age 48 around 2019 and then were chosen as a “UN Women UK delegate to the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women.” After 4 years they get to represent the status of women?!!! 4 years? There are 30 million women in the UK to choose from. This is why feminists get so upset. Show me where someone who transitioned to being male is representing males after 4 years. Men wouldn’t put up with it. Only women are told to move aside.

Trans men wouldn't put themselves forward for such a position.