Would you date a man with a 140 body count?

[Anonymous]

I think mine is between 10 and 20 but idk what the actual number is and I think it’s weird to count.

[Anonymous]

No, because my own count is under 10, as I slept with men I was highly attracted to, physically and intellectually. People who treat sex like recreational activity and stick it anywhere just have different values and value different things in their partner. They built their "dating" around sex only, and their penises. I don't want to be just another hole for them

[Anonymous]

It’s not always weird to count. Mine is 1. Really easy not to lose track.

[Anonymous]

No one who has put his thing in 140 other things is going to put it in my thing.

[Anonymous]

No, because that indicates we are fundamentally mismatched from an intimacy standpoint. I can’t fathom anything more than about 25 partners and even that seems quite high to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No one who has put his thing in 140 other things is going to put it in my thing.

How many previous things is your things limit?

I mean- if one married at 25, and remained faithful, and are average DCUM age, they have a low body count.

But I bet many here were more like 30+ when married - having had a career and romances and ONS and all of the other college and twenty’s experiences. Many on here are divorced and have been dating for years in their 40s. Obviously “body count” might vary widely.

But I’m curious about views like yours- if you imply your vagina is too pristine for this man’s D, how many previous sexual encounters may he have had, to allow his thing into yours?

[Anonymous]

My single male friend in his 40s is probably at that number. It isn’t so ridiculous if your are a good looking bachelor. He’s had a few long terms monogamous relationships, but on the whole has probably been single 16ish of the last 25 years. That’s less than 10 a year for a guy who could meeting someone on tinder and have sex every day.

[Anonymous]

Right. Most women posting on DCUM haven’t had 140 offers, let alone acceptances. That skews things when you realize how old most of us are and how many years some of us have been dating.

Like every number in life, it’s relative.

[Anonymous]

I slept with a guy who probably was about there by mid 30s but was basically just bored and he was good in bed. He caught feelings I didn't share so broke it off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one who has put his thing in 140 other things is going to put it in my thing.

How many previous things is your things limit?

I mean- if one married at 25, and remained faithful, and are average DCUM age, they have a low body count.

But I bet many here were more like 30+ when married - having had a career and romances and ONS and all of the other college and twenty’s experiences. Many on here are divorced and have been dating for years in their 40s. Obviously “body count” might vary widely.

But I’m curious about views like yours- if you imply your vagina is too pristine for this man’s D, how many previous sexual encounters may he have had, to allow his thing into yours?

Sorry, but his thing is attached to a mind and a heart that prioritizes conquest over relationships.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Right. Most women posting on DCUM haven’t had 140 offers, let alone acceptances. That skews things when you realize how old most of us are and how many years some of us have been dating.

Like every number in life, it’s relative.

You are wrong: as a woman, I avoid men like that. Just based on my own experience. I dealt with 2 men who had dozens of partners. Slept with one (he said he was in love etc.), and passed on sleeping with the other one. Both seemed very relationship unstable to me: bragged about women like sex objects, were very poorly organized, acted in a moment, and showed overall low mental organization skills.

I do believe that promiscuity comes with mental issues like ADD or bipolar

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No. I consider sex as something to be shared with a person you care about. A man who takes it lightly wouldn't be on the same wavelength.

+1 this is my answer too and my basic reasoning. I want our ethics about sex to line up.

I guess I could fathom a story where a man was lowkey famous and toured around the country for five years in his early twenties, sleeping with 2 or 3 ladies a month and having that be a part of the "lifestyle" but growing up relatively fast later in his twenties and deciding that's not who he is and not what he wants. Doesn't necessarily have to be an addict, user, cheater...but still probably a red flag under normal circumstances.
A few "busy" years early on could give one a quite high count and still leave plenty of time for committed relationships. Not for me though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think mine is between 10 and 20 but idk what the actual number is and I think it’s weird to count.

Nobody with an ounce of decency or common sense would be him or date him.

[Anonymous]

Can someone sleep with 100+ people and never catch an STD?
I’m honestly asking because it seems almost a given that anyone would catch one at some point.

In a world with no STDs no problem with it, but that isn’t reality, so I would turn them down.

[Anonymous]

Sounds like a peter pan. Not necessarily the number itself, but it seems like he's counting. And who calls it "body count?"

What a juvenile manchild.