Are you the DH in your scenario? Use of the phrase "progressive cause du jour" is indeed cause for some suspicion; it's dismissive and belittling. But you know that already. If you and your progressive spouse cannot have civilzed conversations, if you feel you somehow are expected to make only "affirmative statements" to your more liberal spouse, well, you both are poor communicators, and that problem crosses all political boundaries. If you can't say what you actually think, and your spouse can't tolerate hearing what you think, you both need counseling or at least a better communication style. The issue is "of your making" when you clam up because you feel you're being expected to say certain things. It's also of your spouse's making if your spouse pressures you to conform. What a miserable way to live, never having real discussions and letting silences fester. |
Does he have a little ol' bitty January-6-rioter beard? |
Yes. And you are once again making an assumption that every "conservative" supports the GOP or supports an end to abortion. You missed the idea that there are still some conservatives, even some who still call themselves Republicans, who abhor the GOP of today and what it's doing. Making broad-brush assumptions is a great way to annihilate any shots at getting those conservatives to work with liberals on fighting for abortion access. |
I’m liberal and my h is conservative. We never had any problems…. But …
He never voted for trump He thinks BLM He thinks BLUE lives matter is racist He believes in equality for all He supports LGBT rights He believes in smart gun laws (red flag laws, etc) |
You know how to do that? You elect pro choice candidates that intend to protect reproductive rights. These candidates are overwhelmingly democrats . |
but he votes republican? ok. |
Yes, there are so many courageous Republican lawmakers. They don't walk on eggshells around Tucker Carlson/Fox and the MAGA rabble base, at all! ![]() |
I couldn't do it. And I'd like to think I'm a reasonable individual that is respectful of different view points. Case in point, I recently went out with a man who is a high ranking exec in the mortgage industry, JD/MBA, and generally seems to be a kind, intelligent, successful person. He's from Texas though, and while he dislikes Trump's personality, he clearly is on board with the policy direction of the current GOP. When asked what we should do about school shootings, his response was that "bad actors" are just the price we have to pay for having the most individual freedom in the world. He respects women's right to choice to a degree, but also repeats Fox News tropes that women just use late term abortion as birth control, which no evidence supports and shows a lack of independent critical thinking to me. He said he supports a certain amount of "toxic masculinity" and that we are teaching boys to be to "woke" and "feminine." Ron DeSantis is clearly his man for 2024, which for a host of reasons I cannot respect.
Despite his success and kindness, dating him is a non-starter for me. I don't respect his reasoning or viewpoints and think he lacks care and concern for others in the name of supporting "individual freedom." I don't think you can have a good relationship with men you can't respect. I do have republican friends who are very socially liberal but more small government/fiscal conservative types. They've voted democrat in all recent elections and don't really identify with the GOP any longer. Those types could possibly be on the table for friends/dates. |
DP but no. Stating facts is not "annihilat[ing] any shots at getting those conservatives to work with liberals." It's stating facts. The idea that there exist a group of 1) conservatives that 2) abhor the GOP of today, and 3) support abortion rights, but 4) need to be carefully wooed by liberals to join them in supporting access to abortion, and 5) that wooing includes pretending that ending abortion isn't a GOP goal and accomplishment that has been celebrated at all levels of the party, *is* magical thinking. But it lines right up with the guy upthread who said he doesn't agree with the GOP on anything anymore but can't imagine voting D unless they pull a unicorn out of their hat designed to appeal to him and him alone. The PP who said that those pretending to disagree with the party but still voting for them are "some combination of dumb, weak, hypocrites, or lying about their actual views" hit the nail on the head. |
I disagree, I’m very liberal. Conservative men fix things, take care of the lawn/yard, paint rooms, fix light fixtures, do the taxes, grill, take orders when there is a party, plan tail gates, do the dishes, take their plates to the sink, set up tvs, move furniture, coach kids sports teams, help with nighttime routine (anything family), etc. Things are equal but fall on gender norm lines. |
+1. He sounds very douchey. |
Most the time but not always. He’s very thoughtful about his vote. So am I. I’ve voted for republicans when I thought it made sense. |
Lol, ok. I’ve never known anyone in Opus Dei and I frankly don’t get why people want to call themselves Catholic when they actively oppose what the Chirch teaches. Go be Methodist or something, but you can’t really have your cake and eat it too. |
Because we were taught Catholicism is not a cult and when Catholic teaching is in opposition to Jesus’s teachings we speak up. |
I'll run and tell my mom, who is Director of Religious Education for our diocese, that she should "go be Methodist" because an internet twit who can't spell church and doesn't understand Catholic Social Justice disagrees with the Pope about gay rights. Sure thing. |