Marriage is a horrible deal for women

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I lol when people go on and on complaining about “radical feminists terminating their bloodline.” If you consider me a radical feminist, and I end up not having kids, wouldn’t that therefore be a good thing in your eyes? Since I’m not passing my evil ideology on after all.

That's not how ideologies reproduce. You are reproducing your ideology by advocating for it in this blog. But you're right that modern feminism is a death cult.

Correct. The idea reproduces by getting a hold of the impressionable minds of children and young people. Like older women going on and on about how heterosexual marriage is slavery** and how having freedom with cats and a passport is much better…like the 36 pages of this thread….

**What a completely batsh*t insane thing for, based on the site demographics, an almost certainly privileged affluent white/asian woman to say?!!?!

I’m not advocating for cats and a passport for anyone (except someone who wants that) I advocate for extremely high quality donor sperm from highly attractive and accomplished men, and financial independence to raise a family over partnership with a mediocre man who you have to support, clean up after, and in a divorce lose your children 50% of the time to.

This is absolutely dystopian. I’m assuming you consider yourself liberal. I hope that you embrace the mantle of destroying the family unit, disassembling society to its component parts, and radically remaking the world, when (what I used to think were) wild eyed conservatives accuse you of it.

I’m starting to understand the existential threat posed by liberalism as much as I understand the threat from nihilist populist authoritarians.

I do.

That’s phenomenal - I was worried for a second you masqueraded as “normal”. As long as you self identify as being from the loony left commie fringe, I think we are all set here and can end the discussion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I lol when people go on and on complaining about “radical feminists terminating their bloodline.” If you consider me a radical feminist, and I end up not having kids, wouldn’t that therefore be a good thing in your eyes? Since I’m not passing my evil ideology on after all.

That's not how ideologies reproduce. You are reproducing your ideology by advocating for it in this blog. But you're right that modern feminism is a death cult.

Correct. The idea reproduces by getting a hold of the impressionable minds of children and young people. Like older women going on and on about how heterosexual marriage is slavery** and how having freedom with cats and a passport is much better…like the 36 pages of this thread….

**What a completely batsh*t insane thing for, based on the site demographics, an almost certainly privileged affluent white/asian woman to say?!!?!

I’m not advocating for cats and a passport for anyone (except someone who wants that) I advocate for extremely high quality donor sperm from highly attractive and accomplished men, and financial independence to raise a family over partnership with a mediocre man who you have to support, clean up after, and in a divorce lose your children 50% of the time to.

+1000000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I lol when people go on and on complaining about “radical feminists terminating their bloodline.” If you consider me a radical feminist, and I end up not having kids, wouldn’t that therefore be a good thing in your eyes? Since I’m not passing my evil ideology on after all.

That's not how ideologies reproduce. You are reproducing your ideology by advocating for it in this blog. But you're right that modern feminism is a death cult.

Correct. The idea reproduces by getting a hold of the impressionable minds of children and young people. Like older women going on and on about how heterosexual marriage is slavery** and how having freedom with cats and a passport is much better…like the 36 pages of this thread….

**What a completely batsh*t insane thing for, based on the site demographics, an almost certainly privileged affluent white/asian woman to say?!!?!

I’m not advocating for cats and a passport for anyone (except someone who wants that) I advocate for extremely high quality donor sperm from highly attractive and accomplished men, and financial independence to raise a family over partnership with a mediocre man who you have to support, clean up after, and in a divorce lose your children 50% of the time to.

This is absolutely dystopian. I’m assuming you consider yourself liberal. I hope that you embrace the mantle of destroying the family unit, disassembling society to its component parts, and radically remaking the world, when (what I used to think were) wild eyed conservatives accuse you of it.

I’m starting to understand the existential threat posed by liberalism as much as I understand the threat from nihilist populist authoritarians.

I’m not obligated to make babies & “continue the human race.” I would never give birth no matter what. I hope you realize that.

You not procreating makes a ton of sense to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I lol when people go on and on complaining about “radical feminists terminating their bloodline.” If you consider me a radical feminist, and I end up not having kids, wouldn’t that therefore be a good thing in your eyes? Since I’m not passing my evil ideology on after all.

That's not how ideologies reproduce. You are reproducing your ideology by advocating for it in this blog. But you're right that modern feminism is a death cult.

Correct. The idea reproduces by getting a hold of the impressionable minds of children and young people. Like older women going on and on about how heterosexual marriage is slavery** and how having freedom with cats and a passport is much better…like the 36 pages of this thread….

**What a completely batsh*t insane thing for, based on the site demographics, an almost certainly privileged affluent white/asian woman to say?!!?!

I’m not advocating for cats and a passport for anyone (except someone who wants that) I advocate for extremely high quality donor sperm from highly attractive and accomplished men, and financial independence to raise a family over partnership with a mediocre man who you have to support, clean up after, and in a divorce lose your children 50% of the time to.

This is absolutely dystopian. I’m assuming you consider yourself liberal. I hope that you embrace the mantle of destroying the family unit, disassembling society to its component parts, and radically remaking the world, when (what I used to think were) wild eyed conservatives accuse you of it.

I’m starting to understand the existential threat posed by liberalism as much as I understand the threat from nihilist populist authoritarians.

I do.

That’s phenomenal - I was worried for a second you masqueraded as “normal”. As long as you self identify as being from the loony left commie fringe, I think we are all set here and can end the discussion.

We are a long way from true gender equality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I lol when people go on and on complaining about “radical feminists terminating their bloodline.” If you consider me a radical feminist, and I end up not having kids, wouldn’t that therefore be a good thing in your eyes? Since I’m not passing my evil ideology on after all.

That's not how ideologies reproduce. You are reproducing your ideology by advocating for it in this blog. But you're right that modern feminism is a death cult.

Correct. The idea reproduces by getting a hold of the impressionable minds of children and young people. Like older women going on and on about how heterosexual marriage is slavery** and how having freedom with cats and a passport is much better…like the 36 pages of this thread….

**What a completely batsh*t insane thing for, based on the site demographics, an almost certainly privileged affluent white/asian woman to say?!!?!

I’m not advocating for cats and a passport for anyone (except someone who wants that) I advocate for extremely high quality donor sperm from highly attractive and accomplished men, and financial independence to raise a family over partnership with a mediocre man who you have to support, clean up after, and in a divorce lose your children 50% of the time to.

This is absolutely dystopian. I’m assuming you consider yourself liberal. I hope that you embrace the mantle of destroying the family unit, disassembling society to its component parts, and radically remaking the world, when (what I used to think were) wild eyed conservatives accuse you of it.

I’m starting to understand the existential threat posed by liberalism as much as I understand the threat from nihilist populist authoritarians.

I do.

That’s phenomenal - I was worried for a second you masqueraded as “normal”. As long as you self identify as being from the loony left commie fringe, I think we are all set here and can end the discussion.

We are a long way from true gender equality.

Yes, probably because the vanguard on the feminism side are asking for absolutely batshit crazy things like relegating all “mediocre” men to work camps or something while milking “desirable” men for their sperm to be used by the high earning women to create a new, feminist society.

And the people who are anti-feminist simply espouse the misguided, yet much easier to accept, view that everything is working fine now and the status quo should be maintained and then point out the other side are bunch of whack jobs.

I’ll never stop wondering why we don’t have equality…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I lol when people go on and on complaining about “radical feminists terminating their bloodline.” If you consider me a radical feminist, and I end up not having kids, wouldn’t that therefore be a good thing in your eyes? Since I’m not passing my evil ideology on after all.

That's not how ideologies reproduce. You are reproducing your ideology by advocating for it in this blog. But you're right that modern feminism is a death cult.

Correct. The idea reproduces by getting a hold of the impressionable minds of children and young people. Like older women going on and on about how heterosexual marriage is slavery** and how having freedom with cats and a passport is much better…like the 36 pages of this thread….

**What a completely batsh*t insane thing for, based on the site demographics, an almost certainly privileged affluent white/asian woman to say?!!?!

I’m not advocating for cats and a passport for anyone (except someone who wants that) I advocate for extremely high quality donor sperm from highly attractive and accomplished men, and financial independence to raise a family over partnership with a mediocre man who you have to support, clean up after, and in a divorce lose your children 50% of the time to.

This is absolutely dystopian. I’m assuming you consider yourself liberal. I hope that you embrace the mantle of destroying the family unit, disassembling society to its component parts, and radically remaking the world, when (what I used to think were) wild eyed conservatives accuse you of it.

I’m starting to understand the existential threat posed by liberalism as much as I understand the threat from nihilist populist authoritarians.

I do.

That’s phenomenal - I was worried for a second you masqueraded as “normal”. As long as you self identify as being from the loony left commie fringe, I think we are all set here and can end the discussion.

We are a long way from true gender equality.

Yes, probably because the vanguard on the feminism side are asking for absolutely batshit crazy things like relegating all “mediocre” men to work camps or something while milking “desirable” men for their sperm to be used by the high earning women to create a new, feminist society.

And the people who are anti-feminist simply espouse the misguided, yet much easier to accept, view that everything is working fine now and the status quo should be maintained and then point out the other side are bunch of whack jobs.

I’ll never stop wondering why we don’t have equality…

I’m 100% down for this

[Anonymous]

Singapore contains the of the most educated female populations on Earth. Its leaders are urging them to reproduce with mediocre men, but they aren’t budging, rightfully so.

[Anonymous]

I rarely see women complaining about “the dating market.” Women are generally content with careers, hobbies & friendships. Men, not so much!

[Anonymous]

Marriage now is completely stupid

Missouri is heading back into dark ages

Before the seventies women if they got pregnant job loss . Era us not codified. All red states will be this way and married women will have to defer to husbands.

Women getting pregnant in red states nope don’t do it. Your life is going to suck.

[Anonymous]

Whenever the problem of missing fathers is discussed, the finger never points at the men who chose to be absent, it always turns to women who were either not choosy enough to get the right man, not good enough to keep him, or too bossy to insist on their right to work and carry a fair load at home. It's never "men are running away", it's always "women are turning them off."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I lol when people go on and on complaining about “radical feminists terminating their bloodline.” If you consider me a radical feminist, and I end up not having kids, wouldn’t that therefore be a good thing in your eyes? Since I’m not passing my evil ideology on after all.

That's not how ideologies reproduce. You are reproducing your ideology by advocating for it in this blog. But you're right that modern feminism is a death cult.

Correct. The idea reproduces by getting a hold of the impressionable minds of children and young people. Like older women going on and on about how heterosexual marriage is slavery** and how having freedom with cats and a passport is much better…like the 36 pages of this thread….

**What a completely batsh*t insane thing for, based on the site demographics, an almost certainly privileged affluent white/asian woman to say?!!?!

I’m not advocating for cats and a passport for anyone (except someone who wants that) I advocate for extremely high quality donor sperm from highly attractive and accomplished men, and financial independence to raise a family over partnership with a mediocre man who you have to support, clean up after, and in a divorce lose your children 50% of the time to.

This is absolutely dystopian. I’m assuming you consider yourself liberal. I hope that you embrace the mantle of destroying the family unit, disassembling society to its component parts, and radically remaking the world, when (what I used to think were) wild eyed conservatives accuse you of it.

I’m starting to understand the existential threat posed by liberalism as much as I understand the threat from nihilist populist authoritarians.

I do.

That’s phenomenal - I was worried for a second you masqueraded as “normal”. As long as you self identify as being from the loony left commie fringe, I think we are all set here and can end the discussion.

We are a long way from true gender equality.

Yes, probably because the vanguard on the feminism side are asking for absolutely batshit crazy things like relegating all “mediocre” men to work camps or something while milking “desirable” men for their sperm to be used by the high earning women to create a new, feminist society.

And the people who are anti-feminist simply espouse the misguided, yet much easier to accept, view that everything is working fine now and the status quo should be maintained and then point out the other side are bunch of whack jobs.

I’ll never stop wondering why we don’t have equality…

I’m 100% down for this

That’s totally fine, but you shouldn’t be befuddled when the vast majority of people are repulsed by your proposal and a more moderate equality agenda doesn’t move forward bc you’re the caricature of the movement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Whenever the problem of missing fathers is discussed, the finger never points at the men who chose to be absent, it always turns to women who were either not choosy enough to get the right man, not good enough to keep him, or too bossy to insist on their right to work and carry a fair load at home. It's never "men are running away", it's always "women are turning them off."

Yes, no one in the history of gender discourse or parenting has ever mentioned the term “deadbeat dad” I just invented it and will be filing paperwork at the PTO shortly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I lol when people go on and on complaining about “radical feminists terminating their bloodline.” If you consider me a radical feminist, and I end up not having kids, wouldn’t that therefore be a good thing in your eyes? Since I’m not passing my evil ideology on after all.

That's not how ideologies reproduce. You are reproducing your ideology by advocating for it in this blog. But you're right that modern feminism is a death cult.

Correct. The idea reproduces by getting a hold of the impressionable minds of children and young people. Like older women going on and on about how heterosexual marriage is slavery** and how having freedom with cats and a passport is much better…like the 36 pages of this thread….

**What a completely batsh*t insane thing for, based on the site demographics, an almost certainly privileged affluent white/asian woman to say?!!?!

I’m not advocating for cats and a passport for anyone (except someone who wants that) I advocate for extremely high quality donor sperm from highly attractive and accomplished men, and financial independence to raise a family over partnership with a mediocre man who you have to support, clean up after, and in a divorce lose your children 50% of the time to.

Why would any highly attractive and accomplished man donate sperm to you or any other complete stranger? Seriously how many highly attractive and accomplished men do you even know and why do you think they would want you? They are most likely married and do not want some average Jane having their kid.

Sperm donors are usually just some guy off the street who has to fill out an application and background info. There is no background check or independent verification of donor. Also sperm donors have been sued and force to pay child support.

That is untrue. You clearly have very little knowledge of the ART world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I lol when people go on and on complaining about “radical feminists terminating their bloodline.” If you consider me a radical feminist, and I end up not having kids, wouldn’t that therefore be a good thing in your eyes? Since I’m not passing my evil ideology on after all.

That's not how ideologies reproduce. You are reproducing your ideology by advocating for it in this blog. But you're right that modern feminism is a death cult.

Correct. The idea reproduces by getting a hold of the impressionable minds of children and young people. Like older women going on and on about how heterosexual marriage is slavery** and how having freedom with cats and a passport is much better…like the 36 pages of this thread….

**What a completely batsh*t insane thing for, based on the site demographics, an almost certainly privileged affluent white/asian woman to say?!!?!

I’m not advocating for cats and a passport for anyone (except someone who wants that) I advocate for extremely high quality donor sperm from highly attractive and accomplished men, and financial independence to raise a family over partnership with a mediocre man who you have to support, clean up after, and in a divorce lose your children 50% of the time to.

This is absolutely dystopian. I’m assuming you consider yourself liberal. I hope that you embrace the mantle of destroying the family unit, disassembling society to its component parts, and radically remaking the world, when (what I used to think were) wild eyed conservatives accuse you of it.

I’m starting to understand the existential threat posed by liberalism as much as I understand the threat from nihilist populist authoritarians.

I do.

That’s phenomenal - I was worried for a second you masqueraded as “normal”. As long as you self identify as being from the loony left commie fringe, I think we are all set here and can end the discussion.

We are a long way from true gender equality.

Yes, probably because the vanguard on the feminism side are asking for absolutely batshit crazy things like relegating all “mediocre” men to work camps or something while milking “desirable” men for their sperm to be used by the high earning women to create a new, feminist society.

And the people who are anti-feminist simply espouse the misguided, yet much easier to accept, view that everything is working fine now and the status quo should be maintained and then point out the other side are bunch of whack jobs.

I’ll never stop wondering why we don’t have equality…

Please identify the post in which anyone suggested relegating mediocre men to work camps? Not choosing to reproduce with someone is not a crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

despite the DCUM logic that women should be happy with anyone.

Liar. No one claimed such a thing.

… what do you think the vociferous defense of mediocre men boils down to? Either women can have high standards, and insist on partners who contribute in all areas of life, or we can’t. Personally I say that we should, and if such partners aren’t available we shouldn’t settle.