| I wish Jill Stein were more mainsteam. She is a woman I would love to see as President. Smart, articulate, and straightforward. If only her policies were more mainstream. |
I have a friend voting for her b/c she can't stand either candidate. I'm going Gary for the same reason. I read her platform, and while it's not mainstream, she brings up some significant topics. Philosophically, she's on the right path. Sadly, most people are too concrete to "get" her. |
|
I'm voting for her in PA but when I get live pollsters on the phone, I tell them gary johnson.
If you get polled on the phone, please tell you are voting for johnson even if you aren't - we need to get atleast one of the third party cnadidates up to 15% so they appear on the debate stage. |
That's a smart move! |
| Yes, Jill the smart woman who mother-shames the other candidates. Also, the smart woman who said that "as a feminist," she has looked into Julian Assange and he is not a rapist. |
'' I would love to see Stein in the debates. She speaks from knowledge and not from homogenized talking points. Judy Woodruff was gobsmacked by her the other night. |
|
I just read Stein's platform. It's a recipe for economic armageddon. But I see why so many millenials love her:
"Abolish student debt to free a generation of Americans from debt servitude." I (and most of my generation) paid off my student loans. Do I get that money back? |
I think she's a nut. Nothing about her screams "smart." I mean, her anti-vaccination stance (and her conflict of interest behind it) is disqualifying, IMHO. Not only that, the Greens are so stupid. |
| Plus her footsie with anti-vaxxers is really showing leadership. She couldn't even fly into the right city in Ohio this week. |
Oh yes, it sucked for you so it needs to suck for future generations. Same reason why we need to continue not to offer paid family leave. |
Yeah the anti-science thing really bugs me. |
Absolutely NOT. That would only benefit Trump. No way. |
Oh, good, give Trump more cover during the debates.
|
Hillary wants to give a free ride to college students coming from households making under $125K or less. She said that the states and the state colleges/universities need to do "their share." WTH is the difference? translation - Those making over $125K will pay MORE for tuition to cover everyone else's costs. Furthermore, $125K is not the same here as it is in the Midwest. not sure for whom you're voting, PP - But the Dems (I was one.) aren't that much smarter with money either. |
|
She wants to cut DoD by 50% and shut down all US bases overseas. This is clearly a person who is clueless about foreign policy and national security.
|