Nobody here has stated that Michigan is at the same level as Berkeley. UCLA has risen to Michigan’s level over the past two decades. Those are the three top publics in this country. Professional schools and top OOS students are definitely in the equation when ranking top schools. Very few schools are like the top three, with academic strengths across ALL disciplines. Schools that are overwhelmingly instate, with the exception of the UCs since the population of California is so huge, will have a large percentage of good, but not great, students. Texas is a prime example. That top 6% rule includes thousands of mediocre students from weaker high schools. |
No one who gets a 900 on the SAT is finishing in the top 6% of their high school class...no matter how hood/trailer park. |
No public universities--besides arguably Berkeley, UCLA and Michigan-- are "elite." They are public state schools. Some are great, others are just OK. Putting them in tiers or rows is ridiculous. |
It does seem low. However, there is no question that the top 6% rule allows students to matriculate to Texas that wouldn’t be admitted if they were based on merit. |
In virtually every world ranking , those schools show up as top universities. Academically, all three are elite. |
Ever been to Sunnyside or the Third Ward in Houston? Where the hood, where the hood, where the hood at. |
Every Texas public high school is included. I’m not sure if those students even need to take a SAT/ACT test since it’s an auto admit based on GPAs. |
That's why I said "besides Berkeley UCLA and Michigan" |
Yep. I'm sure there are plenty of kids UT Austin who scored less than 1000 on the SAT (or whatever the ACT equivalent is). |
Of course those students exist - and they have SN issues like dyslexia, anxiety disorders, ADHD, etc. so ask for accommodations. Many top 6% of class kids will test low. Everyone knows this - which is why the colleges were at one point trying to do away with accepting test scores across the board. This is also why accommodations for extra time on the SAT and GRE are accepted. If the student with a low test scores gets a "bad" result then they then they should prep and retake and if still then "bad" apply to schools which are still test-optional. |
I should have prefaced my remarks by saying I agree with you |
Alert the suicide hotlines in Texas that they will be getting a flood of calls from residents who will be distraught over this a-hole not wanting to live there. |
If certain students receive extra time and other accommodations that aren't available to others, it's no longer a *standardized* test. |
I don't think there are many. https://www.prepscholar.com/sat/s/colleges/UT-Austin-admission-requirements#google_vignette |
The thing a lot of people miss about the top 6% admissions stats are that test scores still matter for admission to specific majors. Getting admitted to UT doesn't guarantee any specific major and engineering/CS/B school are very competitive. So there are lots of kids who get admitted to UT Austin but attend a "directional" campus (or elsewhere) because they want a specific course of study. You do get some who will go in and take their chances with their major, but if you look at the message boards, the decision about admissions to Mccombs and CS/Engineering are the real break point. |