The PP: my kid is doing great You: ackshually your kid is not doing great |
Because if their DD doesn't get into an Ivy+, then it'll be seen as a major let down. They don't want to be reminded of paying their property taxes (and not getting the public school benefits) and burning through at least a half million in private school tuition when their DD could've graduated from a W and still matriculated to the same George Washington, Pittsburgh or a mediocre SLAC. |
Your post is barely coherent. |
I found the post easy to follow, except that I don't know what an Ivy+ is. |
I think maybe PP is saying that private school kids still get into the same colleges, so it’s not worth the money? |
Try Raj Chetty's definition: https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2023/07/24/1189443223/affirmative-action-for-rich-kids-its-more-than-just-legacy-admissions "the eight Ivy League schools — Harvard, Princeton, Yale, Columbia, Brown, Cornell, Dartmouth, and UPenn — as well as Stanford, MIT, Duke, and the University of Chicago" |
That’s so arbitrary. What about CalTech? What about the top LACs? These categories are stupid. |
Yes, that's correct. They're going to be really disappointed if their DD could've just gone to a public W and achieved the same result. They'll never admit this. It'll be cloaked in "small classrooms", "individual attention" or some other experiential benefit. For most of them, the juice isn't worth the squeeze. |
I agree generally although LACs are certainly a different kind of school given the undergraduate focus and lack of grad programming. “Ivy” is literally a sports consortium that ended up correlating to a certain caliber of education. Ivy+ seems like it’s trying to expand the label to include all the “best” schools, and I agree it’s kind of silly. |
The sheer level of effort in a public school forum to tear down publics just doesn't make sense. Why? |
You deeply misunderstand the benefits of a top notch private school education. It’s not just about trying to somehow game the college admissions system. |
PP, should I add the individual level of faculty attention, the peer and alumni network, the resources showered upon you once you arrive on campus, and/or the signaling benefits of being an alumnus? Perhaps, it's the alleged "life experience and maturity" (i.e., class) gained at a boarding school? I have friends that attended Andover, Harvard-Westlake, and Dalton. I have friends who attended Sidwell, NCS and other local haunts. My father went to one of these. Many of these kids would've done just fine going to a W school - an education that they could've had for free. Unfortunately, there are quite a few parents deluding themselves into thinking their DD is special. It'll be a sad day when they wake up and realize they're not. They'll comfort themselves that the aforementioned benefits somehow justified the cost. |
NP but I was going to say that if we could afford a private school with superior ELA instruction, that might be reason enough for us. Most other stuff we can live with (or even like) but the ELA curriculum is a weak link, and a big one at that. |
So what is it about, in addition to trying to somehow game the college admissions system? |
I went to college with people who went to Andover etc., and mainly what I observed was a well-developed ability to get drunk four nights a week while still maintaining good grades. |