ECNL moving to school year part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SoCal clubs seems to be getting info MLSN likely going SY

I’d trust that poster more if they knew GA announced SY 2 months ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You don’t understand. MLSN is top dog they can do anything they want even if it doesn’t make sense, they will stay BY . All the best players in the US born between Jan and Aug will flock there, as long as their parents don’t mind all the insane travel and scamming that they will go pro or get a scholarship. MLSN is real. It is not like any other league or even close.

You just hit the nail on the head. If MLSN stays BY, it will not likely be the top draw for about 42 percent of boys. I wish MLSN P2P could stay BY to mitigate RAE for boys and I hope MLSN makes an arrogant decision to stay BY and not a smart business decision to go SY.

MLS already made a "smart" business decision to implement MLS2 mostly to take over anything ECNL and other lesser leagues have gained. Over time MLS will continue to gain more and more of the boys market. Eventually ECNL will be known as a girls league only even more than it already is.

MLSN2 is an overshoot and many players and parents are not excited about the excessive travel, cost and commitment to play in a lower tier league (tier 3 behind EcNL). Some of these MLS2 games are of embarrassing quality too I don’t see that changing even if they change to SY. The idea that MLSN2 replaces ECNL is not a bet I would make.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SoCal clubs seems to be getting info MLSN likely going SY

I’d trust that poster more if they knew GA announced SY 2 months ago.

Not just him

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You don’t understand. MLSN is top dog they can do anything they want even if it doesn’t make sense, they will stay BY . All the best players in the US born between Jan and Aug will flock there, as long as their parents don’t mind all the insane travel and scamming that they will go pro or get a scholarship. MLSN is real. It is not like any other league or even close.

You just hit the nail on the head. If MLSN stays BY, it will not likely be the top draw for about 42 percent of boys. I wish MLSN P2P could stay BY to mitigate RAE for boys and I hope MLSN makes an arrogant decision to stay BY and not a smart business decision to go SY.

MLS already made a "smart" business decision to implement MLS2 mostly to take over anything ECNL and other lesser leagues have gained. Over time MLS will continue to gain more and more of the boys market. Eventually ECNL will be known as a girls league only even more than it already is.

"All the best players in the US born between Jan and Aug will flock there, as long as their parents don’t mind all the insane travel and scamming that they will go pro or get a scholarship." Actually, Jan-July to MLSN, then ECNL gets top players Aug-Dec.

Nope, both age groups will have MLS as their first choice and ECNL as a distant second. At least that's what I see from all the different players and clubs.

Only the girl dad's seem to want ECNL.

Well, previous poster taunting MLSN didn't think so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You don’t understand. MLSN is top dog they can do anything they want even if it doesn’t make sense, they will stay BY . All the best players in the US born between Jan and Aug will flock there, as long as their parents don’t mind all the insane travel and scamming that they will go pro or get a scholarship. MLSN is real. It is not like any other league or even close.

You just hit the nail on the head. If MLSN stays BY, it will not likely be the top draw for about 42 percent of boys. I wish MLSN P2P could stay BY to mitigate RAE for boys and I hope MLSN makes an arrogant decision to stay BY and not a smart business decision to go SY.

MLS already made a "smart" business decision to implement MLS2 mostly to take over anything ECNL and other lesser leagues have gained. Over time MLS will continue to gain more and more of the boys market. Eventually ECNL will be known as a girls league only even more than it already is.

You mean ECNL can't survive without the boys side. They will go bye - bye.

It will be fun watching the ECNL clubs face losing the boys to MLS or maintaining girls ECNL. Eventually they'll switch to GA so they can get MLS for the boys.

Maybe 4-5 years down the road but it won't matter as all the best girls on ECNL will go GA and all the best girls on GA will go ECNL. If you are pushing this this for your girl in GA, in the end they still wind up 2nd tier and being pushed to ECNL. This is why it makes no sense to care what league is top or second or third level. And wouldn't be surprised if MLSN started a girls side to try to stop losing money considering they have no real connection with GA.

Maybe you cant read...
https://www.mlssoccer.com/mlsnext/news/mls-next-announces-strategic-alliance-with-girls-academy

Yeah, "they have no real connection with GA."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You don’t understand. MLSN is top dog they can do anything they want even if it doesn’t make sense, they will stay BY . All the best players in the US born between Jan and Aug will flock there, as long as their parents don’t mind all the insane travel and scamming that they will go pro or get a scholarship. MLSN is real. It is not like any other league or even close.

You just hit the nail on the head. If MLSN stays BY, it will not likely be the top draw for about 42 percent of boys. I wish MLSN P2P could stay BY to mitigate RAE for boys and I hope MLSN makes an arrogant decision to stay BY and not a smart business decision to go SY.

MLS already made a "smart" business decision to implement MLS2 mostly to take over anything ECNL and other lesser leagues have gained. Over time MLS will continue to gain more and more of the boys market. Eventually ECNL will be known as a girls league only even more than it already is.

You mean ECNL can't survive without the boys side. They will go bye - bye.

It will be fun watching the ECNL clubs face losing the boys to MLS or maintaining girls ECNL. Eventually they'll switch to GA so they can get MLS for the boys.

Maybe 4-5 years down the road but it won't matter as all the best girls on ECNL will go GA and all the best girls on GA will go ECNL. If you are pushing this this for your girl in GA, in the end they still wind up 2nd tier and being pushed to ECNL. This is why it makes no sense to care what league is top or second or third level. And wouldn't be surprised if MLSN started a girls side to try to stop losing money considering they have no real connection with GA.

Maybe you cant read...
https://www.mlssoccer.com/mlsnext/news/mls-next-announces-strategic-alliance-with-girls-academy

Yeah, "they have no real connection with GA."

Except for the link on the MLS website specifically calling out that they have a strategic alliance with GA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You don’t understand. MLSN is top dog they can do anything they want even if it doesn’t make sense, they will stay BY . All the best players in the US born between Jan and Aug will flock there, as long as their parents don’t mind all the insane travel and scamming that they will go pro or get a scholarship. MLSN is real. It is not like any other league or even close.

You just hit the nail on the head. If MLSN stays BY, it will not likely be the top draw for about 42 percent of boys. I wish MLSN P2P could stay BY to mitigate RAE for boys and I hope MLSN makes an arrogant decision to stay BY and not a smart business decision to go SY.

MLS already made a "smart" business decision to implement MLS2 mostly to take over anything ECNL and other lesser leagues have gained. Over time MLS will continue to gain more and more of the boys market. Eventually ECNL will be known as a girls league only even more than it already is.

You mean ECNL can't survive without the boys side. They will go bye - bye.

It will be fun watching the ECNL clubs face losing the boys to MLS or maintaining girls ECNL. Eventually they'll switch to GA so they can get MLS for the boys.

Maybe 4-5 years down the road but it won't matter as all the best girls on ECNL will go GA and all the best girls on GA will go ECNL. If you are pushing this this for your girl in GA, in the end they still wind up 2nd tier and being pushed to ECNL. This is why it makes no sense to care what league is top or second or third level. And wouldn't be surprised if MLSN started a girls side to try to stop losing money considering they have no real connection with GA.

Maybe you cant read...
https://www.mlssoccer.com/mlsnext/news/mls-next-announces-strategic-alliance-with-girls-academy

Yeah, "they have no real connection with GA."

Except for the link on the MLS website specifically calling out that they have a strategic alliance with GA.

Wow, if you believe they have an actual strategic alliance other than the vaperware press release.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You don’t understand. MLSN is top dog they can do anything they want even if it doesn’t make sense, they will stay BY . All the best players in the US born between Jan and Aug will flock there, as long as their parents don’t mind all the insane travel and scamming that they will go pro or get a scholarship. MLSN is real. It is not like any other league or even close.

You just hit the nail on the head. If MLSN stays BY, it will not likely be the top draw for about 42 percent of boys. I wish MLSN P2P could stay BY to mitigate RAE for boys and I hope MLSN makes an arrogant decision to stay BY and not a smart business decision to go SY.

MLS already made a "smart" business decision to implement MLS2 mostly to take over anything ECNL and other lesser leagues have gained. Over time MLS will continue to gain more and more of the boys market. Eventually ECNL will be known as a girls league only even more than it already is.

You mean ECNL can't survive without the boys side. They will go bye - bye.

It will be fun watching the ECNL clubs face losing the boys to MLS or maintaining girls ECNL. Eventually they'll switch to GA so they can get MLS for the boys.

Maybe 4-5 years down the road but it won't matter as all the best girls on ECNL will go GA and all the best girls on GA will go ECNL. If you are pushing this this for your girl in GA, in the end they still wind up 2nd tier and being pushed to ECNL. This is why it makes no sense to care what league is top or second or third level. And wouldn't be surprised if MLSN started a girls side to try to stop losing money considering they have no real connection with GA.

Maybe you cant read...
https://www.mlssoccer.com/mlsnext/news/mls-next-announces-strategic-alliance-with-girls-academy

Yeah, "they have no real connection with GA."

Except for the link on the MLS website specifically calling out that they have a strategic alliance with GA.

Wow, if you believe they have an actual strategic alliance other than the vaperware press release.

We're about to see how real MLSs alliance with GA really is. If big ECNL clubs switch to MLS+GA or thr MLS clubs with ECNL girls switch to GA theres your answer.

[Anonymous]

GA basically saying , you guys can take your sweet time to decide whatever F you want to do. We are going SY.

That's how real the "alliance" is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
GA basically saying , you guys can take your sweet time to decide whatever F you want to do. We are going SY.

That's how real the "alliance" is.

I'm sure GA relayed their intentions with MLS before voicing them externally. But I dont see how GAs decision has any bearing on MLS. MLSs top teams are funded pro team acadamies. GAs top teams are exactly the same as ECNL (p2p)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
GA basically saying , you guys can take your sweet time to decide whatever F you want to do. We are going SY.

That's how real the "alliance" is.

I'm sure GA relayed their intentions with MLS before voicing them externally. But I dont see how GAs decision has any bearing on MLS. MLSs top teams are funded pro team acadamies. GAs top teams are exactly the same as ECNL (p2p)

Mlsn is absolute top dawg! So different than any other league by a million miles. Only the best of the best play there. They will stay BY. Trust me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
GA basically saying , you guys can take your sweet time to decide whatever F you want to do. We are going SY.

That's how real the "alliance" is.

I'm sure GA relayed their intentions with MLS before voicing them externally. But I dont see how GAs decision has any bearing on MLS. MLSs top teams are funded pro team acadamies. GAs top teams are exactly the same as ECNL (p2p)

Mlsn is absolute top dawg! So different than any other league by a million miles. Only the best of the best play there. They will stay BY. Trust me.

lol whatta troll

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
GA basically saying , you guys can take your sweet time to decide whatever F you want to do. We are going SY.

That's how real the "alliance" is.

I'm sure GA relayed their intentions with MLS before voicing them externally. But I dont see how GAs decision has any bearing on MLS. MLSs top teams are funded pro team acadamies. GAs top teams are exactly the same as ECNL (p2p)

Mlsn is absolute top dawg! So different than any other league by a million miles. Only the best of the best play there. They will stay BY. Trust me.

lol whatta troll

Ummm... The person you're trying to label a Troll is exactly correct.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
GA basically saying , you guys can take your sweet time to decide whatever F you want to do. We are going SY.

That's how real the "alliance" is.

I'm sure GA relayed their intentions with MLS before voicing them externally. But I dont see how GAs decision has any bearing on MLS. MLSs top teams are funded pro team acadamies. GAs top teams are exactly the same as ECNL (p2p)

Mlsn is absolute top dawg! So different than any other league by a million miles. Only the best of the best play there. They will stay BY. Trust me.

lol whatta troll

Ummm... The person you're trying to label a Troll is exactly correct.

Sure but he’s clearly poking fun at MLSNext parents. So cringe and I’m an MLSNext parent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
GA basically saying , you guys can take your sweet time to decide whatever F you want to do. We are going SY.

That's how real the "alliance" is.

I'm sure GA relayed their intentions with MLS before voicing them externally. But I dont see how GAs decision has any bearing on MLS. MLSs top teams are funded pro team acadamies. GAs top teams are exactly the same as ECNL (p2p)

Mlsn is absolute top dawg! So different than any other league by a million miles. Only the best of the best play there. They will stay BY. Trust me.

lol whatta troll

Ummm... The person you're trying to label a Troll is exactly correct.

Sure but he’s clearly poking fun at MLSNext parents. So cringe and I’m an MLSNext parent.

Not clear to me. I thought it was a little kid that takes pride in their sports ecosystem. That's what kids do, good for him. When he grows up he will realize it was all a facade. No reason to argue with a kid over what they find dear.