Scott Galloway how to save teenage boys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:26 pages and not a lot learned on how to save teenage boys. Just what to complain about. What are the solutions?

I think it’s up to men to solve, not women. We’re busy doing everything else.

I get it. Punching down is hard work.

Women are punching down on men now? Does that mean we are being paid equally?

In the same professions, aren’t we paid equally? I’ve not had a situation where I was paid less than my male colleagues or where they were promoted over me. I’m in the defense industry. Maybe that matters.

But are female pre-school teachers paid the same as male welders? No. But females can be welders too.

No. The pay gap is across the board. The male preschool teacher is statistically making more.

Nope. Not sure where you're getting your information. You're probably just committed to being an oppressed victim, no matter what the evidence bears out.

What evidence?

How about you cite evidence that male preschool teachers with the same qualifications working the same hours make more than female teachers.

I didn't make the claim about pre-school teachers. Why can't you just answer the question and tell us what evidence you have?

Then why don’t you ask the person making the affirmative claim to substantiate it with something other than fee fees. I have a guess…

Are you the one that said this "Nope. Not sure where you're getting your information. You're probably just committed to being an oppressed victim, no matter what the evidence bears out."

If so, I asked YOU for provide the evidence you claim to base your opinion on.

Because you want to confirm your priors. Nope = none of the literature usually making this claim bears the point out once you account for all factors. Usually people without agendas stop making such universal claims (like the pay gap is across the board) when they repeatedly fall apart, unless they are emotionally and ideologically invested in a certain outcome. The tendentious vigor of your inquiry is noted.

OK so you have no evidence, as suspected. The only one emotionally invested in proving a point is you. You are the one who claimed to have evidence ,which you clearly do not have. All I did was ask you to provide it.

Mhmmm, sure. And the "evidence" for the claim posted is showing that men teach in harder-to-staff roles and work more supplemental hours. So not the same work. Curious how that happens so frequently. When "study" after "study" fails to bear the point out, it would suggest that evidence for such broad claims like "the pay gap is across the board" does not exist. You do you, though.

I’m not the PP but the studies I just read out of curiosity did state that the majority of the pay gap was associated with supplemental hours.

However, as suggested by another poster, I read a number of law suits that were settled in favor of the women bc of pay gaps despite same job/same duties or even with the women having a higher level job and higher level duties. So maybe the answer isn’t clear cut either way.

This is a fair and reasonable take, and much less sweeping than other claims. Things always get messy once you get past the agendas and propaganda. A settlement is not always evidence of wrongdoing though; sometimes it's just a cost of doing business for the company. You can always find sensationalized stories and lawsuits:

https://www.npr.org/2019/03/05/700288695/google-pay-study-finds-its-underpaying-men-for-some-jobs

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.639423/gov.uscourts.nysd.639423.1.0.pdf

If you want another study, here is one that suggests that for early childcare workers, women actually outearn men on an hourly basis.

"Although women face pay disparities relative to men in the overall workforce, table 10 suggests that women who are early childhood educators earn more than their male colleagues. Across all early childhood educator populations, women earn an average of $15.33 per hour, compared with men’s
$13.96 per hour. One factor driving this disparity is that a higher share of males are educators coded as child care workers rather than educators coded as preschool teachers. Because child care workers are paid less than preschool teachers, this lowers the average wage among men. Women who work in early care and education earn more than men as well, although the gap is smaller."

https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/97676/early_childhood_educator_compensation_final_2.pdf

The pay inequity study that found that Google was underpaying some men doesn’t mean they were underpaying them compared to women. They could’ve been underpaying them based on location meaning they were getting the same pay as somebody in Philly but they were working in New York.

Google equity is based on job, experience, and location. So that wasn’t exactly paying inequity of men versus women.

It just showed that some men were paid less than their peers who could’ve been in the same job, experience, and location.

So you know better than the company itself?

You neither understood the study nor the explanation of the study

Mmhmmm, sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:26 pages and not a lot learned on how to save teenage boys. Just what to complain about. What are the solutions?

I think it’s up to men to solve, not women. We’re busy doing everything else.

I get it. Punching down is hard work.

Women are punching down on men now? Does that mean we are being paid equally?

In the same professions, aren’t we paid equally? I’ve not had a situation where I was paid less than my male colleagues or where they were promoted over me. I’m in the defense industry. Maybe that matters.

But are female pre-school teachers paid the same as male welders? No. But females can be welders too.

No. The pay gap is across the board. The male preschool teacher is statistically making more.

Nope. Not sure where you're getting your information. You're probably just committed to being an oppressed victim, no matter what the evidence bears out.

What evidence?

How about you cite evidence that male preschool teachers with the same qualifications working the same hours make more than female teachers.

I didn't make the claim about pre-school teachers. Why can't you just answer the question and tell us what evidence you have?

Then why don’t you ask the person making the affirmative claim to substantiate it with something other than fee fees. I have a guess…

Are you the one that said this "Nope. Not sure where you're getting your information. You're probably just committed to being an oppressed victim, no matter what the evidence bears out."

If so, I asked YOU for provide the evidence you claim to base your opinion on.

Because you want to confirm your priors. Nope = none of the literature usually making this claim bears the point out once you account for all factors. Usually people without agendas stop making such universal claims (like the pay gap is across the board) when they repeatedly fall apart, unless they are emotionally and ideologically invested in a certain outcome. The tendentious vigor of your inquiry is noted.

OK so you have no evidence, as suspected. The only one emotionally invested in proving a point is you. You are the one who claimed to have evidence ,which you clearly do not have. All I did was ask you to provide it.

Mhmmm, sure. And the "evidence" for the claim posted is showing that men teach in harder-to-staff roles and work more supplemental hours. So not the same work. Curious how that happens so frequently. When "study" after "study" fails to bear the point out, it would suggest that evidence for such broad claims like "the pay gap is across the board" does not exist. You do you, though.

I’m not the PP but the studies I just read out of curiosity did state that the majority of the pay gap was associated with supplemental hours.

However, as suggested by another poster, I read a number of law suits that were settled in favor of the women bc of pay gaps despite same job/same duties or even with the women having a higher level job and higher level duties. So maybe the answer isn’t clear cut either way.

This is a fair and reasonable take, and much less sweeping than other claims. Things always get messy once you get past the agendas and propaganda. A settlement is not always evidence of wrongdoing though; sometimes it's just a cost of doing business for the company. You can always find sensationalized stories and lawsuits:

https://www.npr.org/2019/03/05/700288695/google-pay-study-finds-its-underpaying-men-for-some-jobs

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.639423/gov.uscourts.nysd.639423.1.0.pdf

If you want another study, here is one that suggests that for early childcare workers, women actually outearn men on an hourly basis.

"Although women face pay disparities relative to men in the overall workforce, table 10 suggests that women who are early childhood educators earn more than their male colleagues. Across all early childhood educator populations, women earn an average of $15.33 per hour, compared with men’s
$13.96 per hour. One factor driving this disparity is that a higher share of males are educators coded as child care workers rather than educators coded as preschool teachers. Because child care workers are paid less than preschool teachers, this lowers the average wage among men. Women who work in early care and education earn more than men as well, although the gap is smaller."

https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/97676/early_childhood_educator_compensation_final_2.pdf

The pay inequity study that found that Google was underpaying some men doesn’t mean they were underpaying them compared to women. They could’ve been underpaying them based on location meaning they were getting the same pay as somebody in Philly but they were working in New York.

Google equity is based on job, experience, and location. So that wasn’t exactly paying inequity of men versus women.

It just showed that some men were paid less than their peers who could’ve been in the same job, experience, and location.

So you know better than the company itself?

You neither understood the study nor the explanation of the study

Mmhmmm, sure.

I take your surrender.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh FFS. It has everything to do with the topic, in this instance that women often deliberately dress provocatively for male attention and then excoriate males for giving them attention. So one way to help teenage boys is to stop treating your teenage girls like perpetual victims and may teach them concepts like agency and accountability.

Young adult females dress like prostitutes. You know it’s bad when our son in college calls to say they need to put some clothes on. This is a male college athlete with a long time girlfriend. I don’t know what happened to girl parents in the last 10 years, but they blew it.

No most Gen Zs wear sweatpants and oversized shirts, more dress like Adam Sandler.

Dude, this. Every Gen Z women I see wears baggy jeans.

I’m an older millennial (40) and I’m the one dressing slutty. Scrunch butt workout pants and crop tops. I was too worried about being a “good girl” in my 20s, so I dressed very modestly and it did absolutely nothing for me. Now I’ve worked hard for my body and want to show it off.

At

How pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:26 pages and not a lot learned on how to save teenage boys. Just what to complain about. What are the solutions?

I think it’s up to men to solve, not women. We’re busy doing everything else.

I get it. Punching down is hard work.

Women are punching down on men now? Does that mean we are being paid equally?

In the same professions, aren’t we paid equally? I’ve not had a situation where I was paid less than my male colleagues or where they were promoted over me. I’m in the defense industry. Maybe that matters.

But are female pre-school teachers paid the same as male welders? No. But females can be welders too.

No. The pay gap is across the board. The male preschool teacher is statistically making more.

Nope. Not sure where you're getting your information. You're probably just committed to being an oppressed victim, no matter what the evidence bears out.

What evidence?

How about you cite evidence that male preschool teachers with the same qualifications working the same hours make more than female teachers.

I didn't make the claim about pre-school teachers. Why can't you just answer the question and tell us what evidence you have?

Then why don’t you ask the person making the affirmative claim to substantiate it with something other than fee fees. I have a guess…

Are you the one that said this "Nope. Not sure where you're getting your information. You're probably just committed to being an oppressed victim, no matter what the evidence bears out."

If so, I asked YOU for provide the evidence you claim to base your opinion on.

Because you want to confirm your priors. Nope = none of the literature usually making this claim bears the point out once you account for all factors. Usually people without agendas stop making such universal claims (like the pay gap is across the board) when they repeatedly fall apart, unless they are emotionally and ideologically invested in a certain outcome. The tendentious vigor of your inquiry is noted.

OK so you have no evidence, as suspected. The only one emotionally invested in proving a point is you. You are the one who claimed to have evidence ,which you clearly do not have. All I did was ask you to provide it.

Mhmmm, sure. And the "evidence" for the claim posted is showing that men teach in harder-to-staff roles and work more supplemental hours. So not the same work. Curious how that happens so frequently. When "study" after "study" fails to bear the point out, it would suggest that evidence for such broad claims like "the pay gap is across the board" does not exist. You do you, though.

I’m not the PP but the studies I just read out of curiosity did state that the majority of the pay gap was associated with supplemental hours.

However, as suggested by another poster, I read a number of law suits that were settled in favor of the women bc of pay gaps despite same job/same duties or even with the women having a higher level job and higher level duties. So maybe the answer isn’t clear cut either way.

This is a fair and reasonable take, and much less sweeping than other claims. Things always get messy once you get past the agendas and propaganda. A settlement is not always evidence of wrongdoing though; sometimes it's just a cost of doing business for the company. You can always find sensationalized stories and lawsuits:

https://www.npr.org/2019/03/05/700288695/google-pay-study-finds-its-underpaying-men-for-some-jobs

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.639423/gov.uscourts.nysd.639423.1.0.pdf

If you want another study, here is one that suggests that for early childcare workers, women actually outearn men on an hourly basis.

"Although women face pay disparities relative to men in the overall workforce, table 10 suggests that women who are early childhood educators earn more than their male colleagues. Across all early childhood educator populations, women earn an average of $15.33 per hour, compared with men’s
$13.96 per hour. One factor driving this disparity is that a higher share of males are educators coded as child care workers rather than educators coded as preschool teachers. Because child care workers are paid less than preschool teachers, this lowers the average wage among men. Women who work in early care and education earn more than men as well, although the gap is smaller."

https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/97676/early_childhood_educator_compensation_final_2.pdf

The pay inequity study that found that Google was underpaying some men doesn’t mean they were underpaying them compared to women. They could’ve been underpaying them based on location meaning they were getting the same pay as somebody in Philly but they were working in New York.

Google equity is based on job, experience, and location. So that wasn’t exactly paying inequity of men versus women.

It just showed that some men were paid less than their peers who could’ve been in the same job, experience, and location.

So you know better than the company itself?

You neither understood the study nor the explanation of the study

Mmhmmm, sure.

I take your surrender.

You're blinkered to the point of hilarity. Keep spinning.

[Anonymous]

He’s being accused of misogyny on TikTok. But hating boys is prevalent on TikTok anyways (a lot of content about by women saying they would despair if they have boy babies instead of girls—you see quotes like “giving birth to my oppressor”) so it doesn’t really mean much.

I think that even if you personally don’t care about boys, it’s a fact that men are more prone to violence, so caring about struggling boys is just smart from a public policy perspective.

[Anonymous]

31 pages of older women calling boys weak is deliciously ironic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:31 pages of older women calling boys weak is deliciously ironic.

It also didn't happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:26 pages and not a lot learned on how to save teenage boys. Just what to complain about. What are the solutions?

I think it’s up to men to solve, not women. We’re busy doing everything else.

I get it. Punching down is hard work.

Women are punching down on men now? Does that mean we are being paid equally?

In the same professions, aren’t we paid equally? I’ve not had a situation where I was paid less than my male colleagues or where they were promoted over me. I’m in the defense industry. Maybe that matters.

But are female pre-school teachers paid the same as male welders? No. But females can be welders too.

No. The pay gap is across the board. The male preschool teacher is statistically making more.

Nope. Not sure where you're getting your information. You're probably just committed to being an oppressed victim, no matter what the evidence bears out.

What evidence?

How about you cite evidence that male preschool teachers with the same qualifications working the same hours make more than female teachers.

I didn't make the claim about pre-school teachers. Why can't you just answer the question and tell us what evidence you have?

Then why don’t you ask the person making the affirmative claim to substantiate it with something other than fee fees. I have a guess…

Are you the one that said this "Nope. Not sure where you're getting your information. You're probably just committed to being an oppressed victim, no matter what the evidence bears out."

If so, I asked YOU for provide the evidence you claim to base your opinion on.

Because you want to confirm your priors. Nope = none of the literature usually making this claim bears the point out once you account for all factors. Usually people without agendas stop making such universal claims (like the pay gap is across the board) when they repeatedly fall apart, unless they are emotionally and ideologically invested in a certain outcome. The tendentious vigor of your inquiry is noted.

OK so you have no evidence, as suspected. The only one emotionally invested in proving a point is you. You are the one who claimed to have evidence ,which you clearly do not have. All I did was ask you to provide it.

Mhmmm, sure. And the "evidence" for the claim posted is showing that men teach in harder-to-staff roles and work more supplemental hours. So not the same work. Curious how that happens so frequently. When "study" after "study" fails to bear the point out, it would suggest that evidence for such broad claims like "the pay gap is across the board" does not exist. You do you, though.

I’m not the PP but the studies I just read out of curiosity did state that the majority of the pay gap was associated with supplemental hours.

However, as suggested by another poster, I read a number of law suits that were settled in favor of the women bc of pay gaps despite same job/same duties or even with the women having a higher level job and higher level duties. So maybe the answer isn’t clear cut either way.

This is a fair and reasonable take, and much less sweeping than other claims. Things always get messy once you get past the agendas and propaganda. A settlement is not always evidence of wrongdoing though; sometimes it's just a cost of doing business for the company. You can always find sensationalized stories and lawsuits:

https://www.npr.org/2019/03/05/700288695/google-pay-study-finds-its-underpaying-men-for-some-jobs

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.639423/gov.uscourts.nysd.639423.1.0.pdf

If you want another study, here is one that suggests that for early childcare workers, women actually outearn men on an hourly basis.

"Although women face pay disparities relative to men in the overall workforce, table 10 suggests that women who are early childhood educators earn more than their male colleagues. Across all early childhood educator populations, women earn an average of $15.33 per hour, compared with men’s
$13.96 per hour. One factor driving this disparity is that a higher share of males are educators coded as child care workers rather than educators coded as preschool teachers. Because child care workers are paid less than preschool teachers, this lowers the average wage among men. Women who work in early care and education earn more than men as well, although the gap is smaller."

https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/97676/early_childhood_educator_compensation_final_2.pdf

The pay inequity study that found that Google was underpaying some men doesn’t mean they were underpaying them compared to women. They could’ve been underpaying them based on location meaning they were getting the same pay as somebody in Philly but they were working in New York.

Google equity is based on job, experience, and location. So that wasn’t exactly paying inequity of men versus women.

It just showed that some men were paid less than their peers who could’ve been in the same job, experience, and location.

So you know better than the company itself?

You neither understood the study nor the explanation of the study

Mmhmmm, sure.

I take your surrender.

You're blinkered to the point of hilarity. Keep spinning.

I’m sorry you are too obtuse to understand that the comparison that you literally linked talked about pay disparity based on locality not gender and you didn’t understand it and now you feel a fool and I get it. You are a fool.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He’s being accused of misogyny on TikTok. But hating boys is prevalent on TikTok anyways (a lot of content about by women saying they would despair if they have boy babies instead of girls—you see quotes like “giving birth to my oppressor”) so it doesn’t really mean much.

I think that even if you personally don’t care about boys, it’s a fact that men are more prone to violence, so caring about struggling boys is just smart from a public policy perspective.

If you follow his interviews, his first interview was misogynistic, as was his second and third and fourth, and so on … the thing is, they didn’t take it seriously until you did an interview on the today show and he actually uncharacteristically was pushed back on by Savannah, who is normally a wet noodle. Anyway, he changed his talking points after that to be less misogynistic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He’s being accused of misogyny on TikTok. But hating boys is prevalent on TikTok anyways (a lot of content about by women saying they would despair if they have boy babies instead of girls—you see quotes like “giving birth to my oppressor”) so it doesn’t really mean much.

I think that even if you personally don’t care about boys, it’s a fact that men are more prone to violence, so caring about struggling boys is just smart from a public policy perspective.

If you follow his interviews, his first interview was misogynistic, as was his second and third and fourth, and so on … the thing is, they didn’t take it seriously until you did an interview on the today show and he actually uncharacteristically was pushed back on by Savannah, who is normally a wet noodle. Anyway, he changed his talking points after that to be less misogynistic.

If you think talking about the need for older men to help boys grow into men worthy of marrying women is misogynistic then I guess you haven’t left the US or been exposed to other cultures much.

But even from the perspective of an average dcum user—this website is heavily pro rich SAHM lifestyle. So many posts by a working moms or about the stupid mommy wars is swarmed by women saying they are happy their dh fully supports them so they can quit work. How do you think there will be future SAHMs if so many boys grow to to be losers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:26 pages and not a lot learned on how to save teenage boys. Just what to complain about. What are the solutions?

I think it’s up to men to solve, not women. We’re busy doing everything else.

I get it. Punching down is hard work.

Women are punching down on men now? Does that mean we are being paid equally?

In the same professions, aren’t we paid equally? I’ve not had a situation where I was paid less than my male colleagues or where they were promoted over me. I’m in the defense industry. Maybe that matters.

But are female pre-school teachers paid the same as male welders? No. But females can be welders too.

No. The pay gap is across the board. The male preschool teacher is statistically making more.

Nope. Not sure where you're getting your information. You're probably just committed to being an oppressed victim, no matter what the evidence bears out.

What evidence?

How about you cite evidence that male preschool teachers with the same qualifications working the same hours make more than female teachers.

I didn't make the claim about pre-school teachers. Why can't you just answer the question and tell us what evidence you have?

Then why don’t you ask the person making the affirmative claim to substantiate it with something other than fee fees. I have a guess…

Are you the one that said this "Nope. Not sure where you're getting your information. You're probably just committed to being an oppressed victim, no matter what the evidence bears out."

If so, I asked YOU for provide the evidence you claim to base your opinion on.

Because you want to confirm your priors. Nope = none of the literature usually making this claim bears the point out once you account for all factors. Usually people without agendas stop making such universal claims (like the pay gap is across the board) when they repeatedly fall apart, unless they are emotionally and ideologically invested in a certain outcome. The tendentious vigor of your inquiry is noted.

OK so you have no evidence, as suspected. The only one emotionally invested in proving a point is you. You are the one who claimed to have evidence ,which you clearly do not have. All I did was ask you to provide it.

Mhmmm, sure. And the "evidence" for the claim posted is showing that men teach in harder-to-staff roles and work more supplemental hours. So not the same work. Curious how that happens so frequently. When "study" after "study" fails to bear the point out, it would suggest that evidence for such broad claims like "the pay gap is across the board" does not exist. You do you, though.

I’m not the PP but the studies I just read out of curiosity did state that the majority of the pay gap was associated with supplemental hours.

However, as suggested by another poster, I read a number of law suits that were settled in favor of the women bc of pay gaps despite same job/same duties or even with the women having a higher level job and higher level duties. So maybe the answer isn’t clear cut either way.

This is a fair and reasonable take, and much less sweeping than other claims. Things always get messy once you get past the agendas and propaganda. A settlement is not always evidence of wrongdoing though; sometimes it's just a cost of doing business for the company. You can always find sensationalized stories and lawsuits:

https://www.npr.org/2019/03/05/700288695/google-pay-study-finds-its-underpaying-men-for-some-jobs

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.639423/gov.uscourts.nysd.639423.1.0.pdf

If you want another study, here is one that suggests that for early childcare workers, women actually outearn men on an hourly basis.

"Although women face pay disparities relative to men in the overall workforce, table 10 suggests that women who are early childhood educators earn more than their male colleagues. Across all early childhood educator populations, women earn an average of $15.33 per hour, compared with men’s
$13.96 per hour. One factor driving this disparity is that a higher share of males are educators coded as child care workers rather than educators coded as preschool teachers. Because child care workers are paid less than preschool teachers, this lowers the average wage among men. Women who work in early care and education earn more than men as well, although the gap is smaller."

https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/97676/early_childhood_educator_compensation_final_2.pdf

The pay inequity study that found that Google was underpaying some men doesn’t mean they were underpaying them compared to women. They could’ve been underpaying them based on location meaning they were getting the same pay as somebody in Philly but they were working in New York.

Google equity is based on job, experience, and location. So that wasn’t exactly paying inequity of men versus women.

It just showed that some men were paid less than their peers who could’ve been in the same job, experience, and location.

So you know better than the company itself?

You neither understood the study nor the explanation of the study

Mmhmmm, sure.

I take your surrender.

You're blinkered to the point of hilarity. Keep spinning.

I’m sorry you are too obtuse to understand that the comparison that you literally linked talked about pay disparity based on locality not gender and you didn’t understand it and now you feel a fool and I get it. You are a fool.

Let me help you out since reading seems to be a challenge for you:

"When Google conducted its annual pay equity analysis for 2018, the tech company found something nobody expected: It was underpaying men for doing similar work as women."

"The underpayment — which flips the typical gender pay gap narrative on its head — mostly applied to one group of software engineers."

"She offered an explanation for the relatively large adjustment compared with the prior year: Female engineers got more discretionary funds than men."

"The Washington Post explains that in Google's 2018 study, "Managers had dipped into the discretionary funds more often for women engineers, creating a pay gap for men in the same job category."

Your schtick is tired, goofy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We have made it culturally cool to be a smart girl now.

We have not made it cool though to be a smart boy.

And our schools are failing boys generally. They are set up for girls to succeed and sit quietly in classrooms, but not for boys to jump around and learn, tactilely or experientially.

This is such blatant goal-post moving. For the entire history of formal education until 25 years ago, boys did just fine in school. Girls were supposed to be ill-suited for academic rigor. Too delicate, too emotional, or whatever. Now that girls excel in the environment that was built for boys, it's unfair to boys? That's some bullshit.

What do you mean built for boys? They modified the environment to benefit the girls. What do you know, you can't serve both well at the same time.

I'm a former teacher and I would love to hear about how school has been modified to meet girls' needs at the detriment to boys. And a warning to you (since I anticipate a non answer or a lie)...everyone here went to school K-12 and remembers what it was like. If anything, schooling had a much higher standard for discipline and rote memorization. Hence, the magnet options like Arlington Traditional School. But please, enlighten us all.

I agree with you, but also, why did the girls start doing so much better at school and at starting at young ages, before their own motivations could play a role? It is surprising how quickly it happened though like you said school was much stricter and had higher expectations, and boys succeeded.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Except liberal white women are the least happy cohort, so I guess it isn’t working out well for them either….

+1 They seem to take offense at almost everything and complain often.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He’s being accused of misogyny on TikTok. But hating boys is prevalent on TikTok anyways (a lot of content about by women saying they would despair if they have boy babies instead of girls—you see quotes like “giving birth to my oppressor”) so it doesn’t really mean much.

I think that even if you personally don’t care about boys, it’s a fact that men are more prone to violence, so caring about struggling boys is just smart from a public policy perspective.

TikTok is designed as a social engineering offensive to weaken U.S. society.

[Anonymous]

Women who have become mothers of boys in the last 20 years have worked hard to raise their sons to be girls. Or “sensitive.” Or non-binary.

Or something; anything other than: boys.