Hunter Biden

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign

Thoughts? I'm more interested in what registered dems and independents think than republicans (and especially conspiracy theorists)

This Independent thinks that these days it's Dems who excel at conspiracy theories, and that Biden is done -- but mainly because of his own behavior.

The Hunter obvious conflict of interest is just a little cherry on the cake.

Are you going to vote for Trump after he's been impeached?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Give it up, OP. Burnishing the family name is not a reason to run, or decide not to run, for president. Maybe it is for Trump, but we've seen how much of a disaster and traitor he's been, with his spilling national security secrets to countries that would like to wipe us out.

I agree that the family issues should have no effect on the person's decision weather to run for the office or not.However, the fact that Biden raise a child who is a total failure speaks a ton about who Biden is.

Look, you can't complain about Hunter pulling down $50k a month, then turn around and call him a "total failure". It just doesn't make sense. Unless you're referring to Beau, which is even worse than not making sense, and you would be a horrible person for calling him that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Give it up, OP. Burnishing the family name is not a reason to run, or decide not to run, for president. Maybe it is for Trump, but we've seen how much of a disaster and traitor he's been, with his spilling national security secrets to countries that would like to wipe us out.

I agree that the family issues should have no effect on the person's decision weather to run for the office or not.However, the fact that Biden raise a child who is a total failure speaks a ton about who Biden is.

Look, you can't complain about Hunter pulling down $50k a month, then turn around and call him a "total failure". It just doesn't make sense. Unless you're referring to Beau, which is even worse than not making sense, and you would be a horrible person for calling him that.

If he’s selling access to dad, your damn right I can call him a total loser.

Very few guys who leave crack pipes in rental cars are winners.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign

Thoughts? I'm more interested in what registered dems and independents think than republicans (and especially conspiracy theorists)

This Independent thinks that these days it's Dems who excel at conspiracy theories, and that Biden is done -- but mainly because of his own behavior.

The Hunter obvious conflict of interest is just a little cherry on the cake.

Are you going to vote for Trump after he's been impeached?

Way too early to tell. And of course it depends on the Dem ticket.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign

Thoughts? I'm more interested in what registered dems and independents think than republicans (and especially conspiracy theorists)

This Independent thinks that these days it's Dems who excel at conspiracy theories, and that Biden is done -- but mainly because of his own behavior.

The Hunter obvious conflict of interest is just a little cherry on the cake.

Are you going to vote for Trump after he's been impeached?

Way too early to tell. And of course it depends on the Dem ticket.

Whoever it is, it's not Hillary. So all of the Never Hillary's can vote for him or her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign

Thoughts? I'm more interested in what registered dems and independents think than republicans (and especially conspiracy theorists)

This Independent thinks that these days it's Dems who excel at conspiracy theories, and that Biden is done -- but mainly because of his own behavior.

The Hunter obvious conflict of interest is just a little cherry on the cake.

Are you going to vote for Trump after he's been impeached?

Way too early to tell. And of course it depends on the Dem ticket.

What an admirable moral compass you have. /s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign

Thoughts? I'm more interested in what registered dems and independents think than republicans (and especially conspiracy theorists)

This Independent thinks that these days it's Dems who excel at conspiracy theories, and that Biden is done -- but mainly because of his own behavior.

The Hunter obvious conflict of interest is just a little cherry on the cake.

Are you going to vote for Trump after he's been impeached?

Way too early to tell. And of course it depends on the Dem ticket.

+1. But yes, most likely. "Impeached" means nothing, except the other party is out to get you. "Convicted" is something else, and that will never happen.

[Anonymous]

Reminds me of JFK—smart, Navy veteran, well educated, famous father.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign

Thoughts? I'm more interested in what registered dems and independents think than republicans (and especially conspiracy theorists)

This Independent thinks that these days it's Dems who excel at conspiracy theories, and that Biden is done -- but mainly because of his own behavior.

The Hunter obvious conflict of interest is just a little cherry on the cake.

Are you going to vote for Trump after he's been impeached?

Way too early to tell. And of course it depends on the Dem ticket.

+1. But yes, most likely. "Impeached" means nothing, except the other party is out to get you. "Convicted" is something else, and that will never happen.

Sure. Soliciting election aid from a foreign government is a minor peccadillo. Whatever you say, chief.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign

Thoughts? I'm more interested in what registered dems and independents think than republicans (and especially conspiracy theorists)

This Independent thinks that these days it's Dems who excel at conspiracy theories, and that Biden is done -- but mainly because of his own behavior.

The Hunter obvious conflict of interest is just a little cherry on the cake.

Are you going to vote for Trump after he's been impeached?

Way too early to tell. And of course it depends on the Dem ticket.

What an admirable moral compass you have. /s

Actually I do.

I was deeply ashamed, for example, of the way Dems treated Kavanaugh and his family.

Probably you don'y even know what moral compass means, or how to use one.

So please stop with the "clever" insults and instead argue like an adult.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign

Thoughts? I'm more interested in what registered dems and independents think than republicans (and especially conspiracy theorists)

This Independent thinks that these days it's Dems who excel at conspiracy theories, and that Biden is done -- but mainly because of his own behavior.

The Hunter obvious conflict of interest is just a little cherry on the cake.

Are you going to vote for Trump after he's been impeached?

Way too early to tell. And of course it depends on the Dem ticket.

+1. But yes, most likely. "Impeached" means nothing, except the other party is out to get you. "Convicted" is something else, and that will never happen.

Sure. Soliciting election aid from a foreign government is a minor peccadillo. Whatever you say, chief.

DP: You've been brainwashed, chief.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Give it up, OP. Burnishing the family name is not a reason to run, or decide not to run, for president. Maybe it is for Trump, but we've seen how much of a disaster and traitor he's been, with his spilling national security secrets to countries that would like to wipe us out.

I agree that the family issues should have no effect on the person's decision weather to run for the office or not.However, the fact that Biden raise a child who is a total failure speaks a ton about who Biden is.

Look, you can't complain about Hunter pulling down $50k a month, then turn around and call him a "total failure". It just doesn't make sense. Unless you're referring to Beau, which is even worse than not making sense, and you would be a horrible person for calling him that.

If he’s selling access to dad, your damn right I can call him a total loser.

Very few guys who leave crack pipes in rental cars are winners.

Oh, wow. If "selling access to dad" is what triggers you to call someone a total loser, then you must call the Trump kids ultramega total losers! But you don't, do you? Because you're just a Trumpster. You're probably pissed about Hunter leaving crack pipes in a rental car because you'd never leave yours behind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Give it up, OP. Burnishing the family name is not a reason to run, or decide not to run, for president. Maybe it is for Trump, but we've seen how much of a disaster and traitor he's been, with his spilling national security secrets to countries that would like to wipe us out.

I agree that the family issues should have no effect on the person's decision weather to run for the office or not.However, the fact that Biden raise a child who is a total failure speaks a ton about who Biden is.

Look, you can't complain about Hunter pulling down $50k a month, then turn around and call him a "total failure". It just doesn't make sense. Unless you're referring to Beau, which is even worse than not making sense, and you would be a horrible person for calling him that.

If he’s selling access to dad, your damn right I can call him a total loser.

Very few guys who leave crack pipes in rental cars are winners.

Oh, wow. If "selling access to dad" is what triggers you to call someone a total loser, then you must call the Trump kids ultramega total losers! But you don't, do you? Because you're just a Trumpster. You're probably pissed about Hunter leaving crack pipes in a rental car because you'd never leave yours behind.

Dems are the best.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Reminds me of JFK—smart, Navy veteran, well educated, famous father.

Joe?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-biden-jeopardize-his-fathers-campaign

Thoughts? I'm more interested in what registered dems and independents think than republicans (and especially conspiracy theorists)

This Independent thinks that these days it's Dems who excel at conspiracy theories, and that Biden is done -- but mainly because of his own behavior.

The Hunter obvious conflict of interest is just a little cherry on the cake.

Are you going to vote for Trump after he's been impeached?

Way too early to tell. And of course it depends on the Dem ticket.

What an admirable moral compass you have. /s

Actually I do.

I was deeply ashamed, for example, of the way Dems treated Kavanaugh and his family.

Probably you don'y even know what moral compass means, or how to use one.

So please stop with the "clever" insults and instead argue like an adult.

Indeed, I know what integrity means, honor, being upstanding.

These are old fashioned ideas but still relevant, important, even when in short supply.