Schools closely track their historical yield, including by division. Sidwell admits more than it expects, because it does not get 100% yield, but their yield percentage is well above 50% from what I understand. Your overall point is an important one, however, because inevitably on this thread somebody asks people to post what schools they are declining to give hope to those on a waiting list. Unless the number of declined offers exceeds the historical norm, any declined offer is just the built-in cushion and you can't assume the waiting list "goes live." |
| Also, schools do tend to disseminate some self-serving propaganda about how desirable they are. UNlike colleges, there is no disclosure requirement, so schools jostle for preeminence in part by trying to create a mystique — “We’re so desirable.” |
You are wrong. There are more applicants to GDS to begin with, in my understanding. Also if applying from a progressive k-8 you have an advantage probably. |
+1 - would NEVER consider GDS so it is NOT everyone's cup of tea! |
You posted almost the same sentence two days ago. Relax. No one is demanding that GDS be your cup of tea! Pick whatever tea you want (or better yet, let your child pick his or her own cup of tea!). |
So you are saying that there are more applicants to GDS than any of the other top privates? (In order to keep the rate the same, it would have to be A LOT more) |