Why not? People do that all over the world, and all over DC to greater or lesser degrees, not just WOTP. Otherwise everyone would live EOTR. |
Exactly. But developers try to shove it all down the neighborhood's throat. Look at Macomb St. People wanted a renovated grocery store and they got two blocks of Cathedral Commons instead, which has put a lot more traffic on nearby streets. |
Let's tell Mary Cheh that we support low income housing in Forest Hills, where she lives. But it seems that she ensures that things like the homeless shelter, DC facilities and low income housing never happen in her neighborhood. She's the personification of the know it all, limousine liberal. |
Isn't Janney going to be 10 percent 'at risk' quota kids? |
Doesn't AU Park deserve to have its own Cathedral Commons? |
Chen proposed her own neighborhood as one of the five 'not Glover Pk/developer boondoggle' sites. In fact, the exact address that she proposed on the record, to the Council, is about 3 blocks from her home address, on Albemarle st. You get your own opinions, but not your own facts. |
* cheh
|
That was a complete straw man, because the property listed is not owned by the DC government, which would have had to pay market rate for the site. So it wasn't going to happen. There was also a suggestion of locating the shelter next to the Best Buy or on land owned by St. Ann's behind Janney. But that would have been creepy. |
aka "Schlock Square"? No thx. |
the fact that that house is not owned by the District doesn't make the proposal a straw man; it's your cynicism telling you that. In fact, the Albemarle property was a viable site, available at a fraction of a fraction of the cost of the Glover Park proposal, due to the latter's developer attachments. Recall that district-owned MPD site wasn't, and still isn't, a foregone result. |
So your argument is that putting affordable housing in nice areas is sticking it to rich people? And what is inundating a middle class area with it then? Why shouldn't they be load balanced! I for one think increasing density to allow the developer to pull off a 50/50 spilt would be great for the area and the city. I am a ward 3 voter and I too sent an email stating as much. |
Traffic on Mass avenue and Wisconsin will be hell. Especially on narrow Mass, with the Westbard and AU developments... |
so what, is AU part entitled to clear traffic too? |
Actually, it is fair, its called having money and its what happens ina democracy. Some people can afford to live in nicer places. So9me people can't. That' s life. |
It's not going to increase traffic much bc it will mostly be people in the neighborhood using these stores. |