NP, but Lynch wasn't confirmed as AG until 2015. |
No I am not okay with the bullying I endured. But I saw it for what it was: acts by the ignorant few, individuals like that exist in any society. Second, I realized that the government or Reagan wasn't out to get me in particular when they take such a strong stance against communism, such as when they scrutinized my family far more due to our background. As long as I did not hold a position against the US government or the American way of life, they welcomed me as a US citizen. There was no systemic attempt to oppress those of us who came from a communist country. Instead my family enjoyed the benefits of living and flourishing in a free society, subscribing fully to the ideals that makes America great. The American Indians, black slaves, and Japanese Americans during WWII knew a different America, that's not the America that exists today. I am not living in fear of hate crimes against my children because of their Chinese heritage, even though China is still a "communist" country. I also want to clarify something, what I don't agree with is certain ideals held by certain people from Muslim countries. Similarly, Reagan and the US government was against ideals held by certain people from communist countries, not people from communist countries in general. |
I meant Arizona State. (There was a less violent incident at Temole, and got the two mixed up. The one at Arizona State was beat badly. I'll get a link. In the meantime, here's a horrible incident against a 12-year-old. http://www.liberalamerica.org/2016/05/24/jewish-student-violently-attacked-classmates-shouted-kill-jew/ |
I'm pretty sure that even right now, we try to thoroughly vet refugees and immigrants coming from Muslim countries. Trump's litmus test is not very well thought out. People can easily lie. I'm betting plenty of pro-USSR/Chinese communists got through the vetting process and legally immigrated to the US. You may not know or remember about McCarthyism. It was a pretty terrible part of our history. Random people were accused of being communists, and the mere mention of communism and your name together in a sentence was enough to cause suspicion and damage your reputation.. Not a great part of our history. |
That was my, perhaps not very clear, point. |
PP. OK, this is the one I was thinking of. It was Michigan State. (There was also a lesser one at Arizona, and I'm getting mixed up which hate crime occurred where.) This is the one I am thinking of. My point is that I haven't heard Obama speak out against antisemitic attacks on college campuses. http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2012/08/28/msu-student-knocked-unconscious-mouth-stapled-shut-in-alleged-hate-crime/ |
So, you don't mean the one in 2014. You mean to cite a more relevant one from 2012.
|
The incidents that you cites are of course horrific. Obama has spoken out strongly against anti-Semitism: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/obamas-powerful-condemnation-of-anti-semitism-we-are-all-jews/2016/01/29/9b32233c-c611-11e5-a4aa-f25866ba0dc6_story.html The difference between anti-Semitism and the anti-Muslim and anti-Arab prejudice is that all American politicians routinely and categorically condemn anti-Semitism. Anti-Muslim and anti-Arab prejudice, on the other hand, is being promoted by the Republican nominee for president. Surely you can acknowledge that difference? Ironically, if there is any tolerance of anti-Semitism within American politics at all, it exists among the white nationalists/neo-Nazis supporting Trump. You may recall the infamous "sheriff's badge" or six-pointed star that Trump tweeted regarding Clinton. That originated on an anti-Semitic website. |
I'd say there's be rather more scrutiny of immigration and travelers associated with Muslim countries since 9/11. Surely you've heard of the no fly list and the terrorist watch list. Yet in spite of this increased level of scrutiny post 9/11, the US does not currently have a widespread systemic problem of hate crimes against Muslims. Again the fears that the US will devolve into some type of a nightmarish state for Muslims in the future due to increased immigration scrutiny simply has no basis in reality. Yes, exclusion, more intense screening and suspicion of Muslims is very much warranted due to what we are observing in the world. The US does not have an open border policy so this necessarily means that we exclude some people. We give visas easily to Canadians but not Russians so obviously some people are subject to more intense screening due to suspicion. The US doesn't let in just anyone for the same reason you don't invite just anyone into your home. For example, you may not like me as a person and are suspicious of me due to what I've expressed here, and would exclude me from coming into your home after intensive screening. That's your prerogative. It is also our prerogative as Americans to treat Non-Americans with the same degree of caution - there is nothing wrong with that. |
Any chance you might acknowledge the attack was wrong? That's my point. The majority of religious hate crimes are against Jews - and particularly on campuses - and Obama doesn't say a word to discourage the rise in antisemitism while speaking out (rightly) against bigotry toward Muslims and blacks. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/03/03/ucla-student-government-questions-judicial-board-nominee-being-jewish |
Have you commented on the actual killings that I mentioned when starting this thread? Before you complain about a lack of acknowledgement about off-topic incidents, maybe you should do that first? Also, as I pointed out Obama has spoken out against anti-Semitism. No major American politician has spoken in favor of anti-Semitism. However, Trump does openly espouse anti-Muslim and anti-Arab policies. Might you stop your Google searches long enough to acknowledge that difference? |
Well, Israel is an ideological and strategic ally. Meanwhile a not-insignificant portion of the Muslim population wants us to be subject to their religious laws even if we are non-believers. I believe it's important to draw a distinction between being against a set of ideals versus being against a population that may be associated with regional practice of those ideals. Saying that we need to subject Muslim immigrants to more scrutiny is not the same as saying that we are anti-Muslim. That's a straw-man. Again, I don't particularly like Trump and his exact position on this is quite foggy. I'd rather not assume the most extremist thing he has ever said is representative of where he is at on this issue. I know I've said some pretty stupid things in the past and if people always judged me by my worst behavior, I'd be marked as a pretty horrible person. I mean I used snakes as an example for stereotyping Muslims - in the name of all things secular, where was my decency? |
Also, if Trump spoke about Jews the way he does about Muslims, he would never have gotten the Republican nomination. Fortunately that kind of bigotry against Jews is no longer accepted by the majority of Americans but bigotry against Muslims is still quite acceptable - thus Trump's popularity. |
I was answering another poster before I saw your response, and I am glad (if one can be "glad" about anything when speaking of hate crimes) that you do acknowledge how horrific these antisemitic attacks were. I also read your link to the WP and am "glad" that Obama has indeed condemned this anti-Jewish sentiment. do feel, though, that the degree to which anntisemitism exists in this country is brushed under the rug, as people always seem surprised that the majority of hate crimes are perpetrated against Jews. (All that said, Muslim and black bigotry are of course also unacceptable and should be condemned.) |
A not-insignificant portion of Americans support unconstitutional policies restricting first amendment rights, not to mention other civil rights. I guarantee there are more of those than the hypothetical Muslims plotting to subject you to "religious laws". Talk about a straw man. |