Juanita Broadrick - Clinton rape victim - doing a live AMA on Reddit now

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3729466/Child-rape-victim-comes-forward-time-40-years-call-Hillary-Clinton-liar-defended-rapist-smearing-blocking-evidence-callously-laughing-knew-guilty.html

Sad, sad story.

Been debunked so, so, so many times.

Please share this with us then. Your claim is only as good as a credible source.

The woman has changed her story so many times, she has made herself, not credible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3729466/Child-rape-victim-comes-forward-time-40-years-call-Hillary-Clinton-liar-defended-rapist-smearing-blocking-evidence-callously-laughing-knew-guilty.html

Sad, sad story.

Been debunked so, so, so many times.

Please share this with us then. Your claim is only as good as a credible source.

There is a whole thread about this here. It has nothing to do with Juanita Broaddrick.
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/542618.page

[Anonymous]

I only read this news story and this thread, so I don't know much about this woman. But here's what I've come away with.

I believe this poor 12 year old girl was lured away in a car by two men, one the defendant 40 year old creep and another a 15 year old creep, and raped and beaten up when she struggled. I believe that was horrible and degrading.

I believe that Hillary Clinton then went on to defend this creep and get his sentence reduced from 30 years to one year based on largely a screw up by the technician who threw away the scrap of panties that proved the rape after the first round of tests on it rather than preserving it. I think Clinton was around 26 years old at the time, so not more than a few years out of law school. Young and not very seasoned or experienced.

I also believe the other parts of this woman's story -- that Clinton asked for the victim to have psychological testing, that Clinton may have insinuated that the girl was looking for older male role models/companionship. I also think that Clinton ruefully laughed when, in later describing this travesty of a case to an interviewer, she said that her client even passed a lie detector test which made her doubt the accuracy of such tests for the rest of her career. In other words, I believe that Clinton may have felt in her gut that he was guilty even if she did not have concrete evidence to prove that, and yet she still worked hard at getting this scum the best deal she could.

I believe all of this and I feel sorry for this woman, but I'm still okay with Hillary Clinton. Partly it's because I'm a lawyer and I have worked in support of deals that I personally oppose. So I know that's part of the job. And partly it's because I have been a 26 year old woman surrounded by men trying to get my head above water so I can survive to fight another day. And she did survive to do a lot of good for a lot of other people. We're not all saints all the time.

And partly I look at the other choice in this election and I think you've got to be kidding me.

I'm very sorry for this woman and it sounds like she has had a difficult life in part as a result from this terrible rape. But Clinton didn't rape her, and all the things she did in service of her client were standard and considered smart strategy back then. Women internalized and reflected back a lot more sexism twenty years ago than they do now. I know Clinton isn't perfect and she makes mistakes. But I still like her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I only read this news story and this thread, so I don't know much about this woman. But here's what I've come away with.

I believe this poor 12 year old girl was lured away in a car by two men, one the defendant 40 year old creep and another a 15 year old creep, and raped and beaten up when she struggled. I believe that was horrible and degrading.

I believe that Hillary Clinton then went on to defend this creep and get his sentence reduced from 30 years to one year based on largely a screw up by the technician who threw away the scrap of panties that proved the rape after the first round of tests on it rather than preserving it. I think Clinton was around 26 years old at the time, so not more than a few years out of law school. Young and not very seasoned or experienced.

I also believe the other parts of this woman's story -- that Clinton asked for the victim to have psychological testing, that Clinton may have insinuated that the girl was looking for older male role models/companionship. I also think that Clinton ruefully laughed when, in later describing this travesty of a case to an interviewer, she said that her client even passed a lie detector test which made her doubt the accuracy of such tests for the rest of her career. In other words, I believe that Clinton may have felt in her gut that he was guilty even if she did not have concrete evidence to prove that, and yet she still worked hard at getting this scum the best deal she could.

I believe all of this and I feel sorry for this woman, but I'm still okay with Hillary Clinton. Partly it's because I'm a lawyer and I have worked in support of deals that I personally oppose. So I know that's part of the job. And partly it's because I have been a 26 year old woman surrounded by men trying to get my head above water so I can survive to fight another day. And she did survive to do a lot of good for a lot of other people. We're not all saints all the time.

And partly I look at the other choice in this election and I think you've got to be kidding me.

I'm very sorry for this woman and it sounds like she has had a difficult life in part as a result from this terrible rape. But Clinton didn't rape her, and all the things she did in service of her client were standard and considered smart strategy back then. Women internalized and reflected back a lot more sexism twenty years ago than they do now. I know Clinton isn't perfect and she makes mistakes. But I still like her.

Thank you for this rational post!

[Anonymous]

I also think that Clinton ruefully laughed when, in later describing this travesty of a case to an interviewer, she said that her client even passed a lie detector test which made her doubt the accuracy of such tests for the rest of her career

Ruefully laughed? Have you listened to the tape. No regret at all in her laugh--maybe a tad of embarrassment that she was so diabolical in her defense of a man that she was pretty sure had done a horrible thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Old news. Not proven. Part of the witch hunt against the Clintons.

Don't care, nor do my female friends. We care about climate change, the Supreme Court, health care.

And you really believe that Hillary is going to be elected President and serve the people? That she isn't fulfilling some egocentric, power-driven popularity contest? That she is going to do as promised?

Wow. You are dumbs do gullible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I only read this news story and this thread, so I don't know much about this woman. But here's what I've come away with.

I believe this poor 12 year old girl was lured away in a car by two men, one the defendant 40 year old creep and another a 15 year old creep, and raped and beaten up when she struggled. I believe that was horrible and degrading.

I believe that Hillary Clinton then went on to defend this creep and get his sentence reduced from 30 years to one year based on largely a screw up by the technician who threw away the scrap of panties that proved the rape after the first round of tests on it rather than preserving it. I think Clinton was around 26 years old at the time, so not more than a few years out of law school. Young and not very seasoned or experienced.

I also believe the other parts of this woman's story -- that Clinton asked for the victim to have psychological testing, that Clinton may have insinuated that the girl was looking for older male role models/companionship. I also think that Clinton ruefully laughed when, in later describing this travesty of a case to an interviewer, she said that her client even passed a lie detector test which made her doubt the accuracy of such tests for the rest of her career. In other words, I believe that Clinton may have felt in her gut that he was guilty even if she did not have concrete evidence to prove that, and yet she still worked hard at getting this scum the best deal she could.

I believe all of this and I feel sorry for this woman, but I'm still okay with Hillary Clinton. Partly it's because I'm a lawyer and I have worked in support of deals that I personally oppose. So I know that's part of the job. And partly it's because I have been a 26 year old woman surrounded by men trying to get my head above water so I can survive to fight another day. And she did survive to do a lot of good for a lot of other people. We're not all saints all the time.

And partly I look at the other choice in this election and I think you've got to be kidding me.

I'm very sorry for this woman and it sounds like she has had a difficult life in part as a result from this terrible rape. But Clinton didn't rape her, and all the things she did in service of her client were standard and considered smart strategy back then. Women internalized and reflected back a lot more sexism twenty years ago than they do now. I know Clinton isn't perfect and she makes mistakes. But I still like her.

And I guess you will believe what you want to believe as long as it serves you, right? Because it is easier to live in denial? And because she is the "lesser of two evils"? (Which she isnt, by the way, Gary Johnson is out there) But, like every other liberal that exists, it is easy to preach make believe ideals as long as you don't have to get your hands dirty.

You are what is wrong with our country. You won't stand up for the right thing because it is easier to go with the flow. Sheep.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I also think that Clinton ruefully laughed when, in later describing this travesty of a case to an interviewer, she said that her client even passed a lie detector test which made her doubt the accuracy of such tests for the rest of her career

Ruefully laughed? Have you listened to the tape. No regret at all in her laugh--maybe a tad of embarrassment that she was so diabolical in her defense of a man that she was pretty sure had done a horrible thing.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I only read this news story and this thread, so I don't know much about this woman. But here's what I've come away with.

I believe this poor 12 year old girl was lured away in a car by two men, one the defendant 40 year old creep and another a 15 year old creep, and raped and beaten up when she struggled. I believe that was horrible and degrading.

I believe that Hillary Clinton then went on to defend this creep and get his sentence reduced from 30 years to one year based on largely a screw up by the technician who threw away the scrap of panties that proved the rape after the first round of tests on it rather than preserving it. I think Clinton was around 26 years old at the time, so not more than a few years out of law school. Young and not very seasoned or experienced.

I also believe the other parts of this woman's story -- that Clinton asked for the victim to have psychological testing, that Clinton may have insinuated that the girl was looking for older male role models/companionship. I also think that Clinton ruefully laughed when, in later describing this travesty of a case to an interviewer, she said that her client even passed a lie detector test which made her doubt the accuracy of such tests for the rest of her career. In other words, I believe that Clinton may have felt in her gut that he was guilty even if she did not have concrete evidence to prove that, and yet she still worked hard at getting this scum the best deal she could.

I believe all of this and I feel sorry for this woman, but I'm still okay with Hillary Clinton. Partly it's because I'm a lawyer and I have worked in support of deals that I personally oppose. So I know that's part of the job. And partly it's because I have been a 26 year old woman surrounded by men trying to get my head above water so I can survive to fight another day. And she did survive to do a lot of good for a lot of other people. We're not all saints all the time.

And partly I look at the other choice in this election and I think you've got to be kidding me.

I'm very sorry for this woman and it sounds like she has had a difficult life in part as a result from this terrible rape. But Clinton didn't rape her, and all the things she did in service of her client were standard and considered smart strategy back then. Women internalized and reflected back a lot more sexism twenty years ago than they do now. I know Clinton isn't perfect and she makes mistakes. But I still like her.

And I guess you will believe what you want to believe as long as it serves you, right? Because it is easier to live in denial? And because she is the "lesser of two evils"? (Which she isnt, by the way, Gary Johnson is out there) But, like every other liberal that exists, it is easy to preach make believe ideals as long as you don't have to get your hands dirty.

You are what is wrong with our country. You won't stand up for the right thing because it is easier to go with the flow. Sheep.

+1,000,000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He's a dirty, horrible dog. I'm voting for the person whose name is on the ballot - Hillary.

I haven't read the entire thread but her name is on the ballot, so whatever happens can happen to him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Old news. Not proven. Part of the witch hunt against the Clintons.

Don't care, nor do my female friends. We care about climate change, the Supreme Court, health care.

And you really believe that Hillary is going to be elected President and serve the people? That she isn't fulfilling some egocentric, power-driven popularity contest? That she is going to do as promised?

Wow. You are dumbs do gullible.

Yes, Hillary is going to be elected President to serve the people. She will fulfill the will of the 2016 electorate, in the 2016 election. Call it an "egocentric, power-driven popularity contest" all you want, it's an election. I'm not at all surprised that you never called anyone else's election that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I only read this news story and this thread, so I don't know much about this woman. But here's what I've come away with.

I believe this poor 12 year old girl was lured away in a car by two men, one the defendant 40 year old creep and another a 15 year old creep, and raped and beaten up when she struggled. I believe that was horrible and degrading.

I believe that Hillary Clinton then went on to defend this creep and get his sentence reduced from 30 years to one year based on largely a screw up by the technician who threw away the scrap of panties that proved the rape after the first round of tests on it rather than preserving it. I think Clinton was around 26 years old at the time, so not more than a few years out of law school. Young and not very seasoned or experienced.

I also believe the other parts of this woman's story -- that Clinton asked for the victim to have psychological testing, that Clinton may have insinuated that the girl was looking for older male role models/companionship. I also think that Clinton ruefully laughed when, in later describing this travesty of a case to an interviewer, she said that her client even passed a lie detector test which made her doubt the accuracy of such tests for the rest of her career. In other words, I believe that Clinton may have felt in her gut that he was guilty even if she did not have concrete evidence to prove that, and yet she still worked hard at getting this scum the best deal she could.

I believe all of this and I feel sorry for this woman, but I'm still okay with Hillary Clinton. Partly it's because I'm a lawyer and I have worked in support of deals that I personally oppose. So I know that's part of the job. And partly it's because I have been a 26 year old woman surrounded by men trying to get my head above water so I can survive to fight another day. And she did survive to do a lot of good for a lot of other people. We're not all saints all the time.

And partly I look at the other choice in this election and I think you've got to be kidding me.

I'm very sorry for this woman and it sounds like she has had a difficult life in part as a result from this terrible rape. But Clinton didn't rape her, and all the things she did in service of her client were standard and considered smart strategy back then. Women internalized and reflected back a lot more sexism twenty years ago than they do now. I know Clinton isn't perfect and she makes mistakes. But I still like her.

And I guess you will believe what you want to believe as long as it serves you, right? Because it is easier to live in denial? And because she is the "lesser of two evils"? (Which she isnt, by the way, Gary Johnson is out there) But, like every other liberal that exists, it is easy to preach make believe ideals as long as you don't have to get your hands dirty.

You are what is wrong with our country. You won't stand up for the right thing because it is easier to go with the flow. Sheep.

+1,000,000

I believe a fundamental part of our justice system is that each defendant is entitle to a lawyer who serves as his or her zealous advocate. I think Hillary did that, and I'm OK with that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I also think that Clinton ruefully laughed when, in later describing this travesty of a case to an interviewer, she said that her client even passed a lie detector test which made her doubt the accuracy of such tests for the rest of her career

Ruefully laughed? Have you listened to the tape. No regret at all in her laugh--maybe a tad of embarrassment that she was so diabolical in her defense of a man that she was pretty sure had done a horrible thing.

Exactly.

A lawyer is ethically obligated to do what's best for THEIR CLIENT, not society. Clinton did not have a choice. If she had thrown the case people would have assailed her for the rest of her career for being unprofessional.

[Anonymous]

No habitual liar is ever considered professional.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3729466/Child-rape-victim-comes-forward-time-40-years-call-Hillary-Clinton-liar-defended-rapist-smearing-blocking-evidence-callously-laughing-knew-guilty.html

Sad, sad story.

Been debunked so, so, so many times.

Please share this with us then. Your claim is only as good as a credible source.

The woman has changed her story so many times, she has made herself, not credible.

Read the AMA. When a young women is being harassed and stalked by Clinton's PIs, she probably is scared for her life. Besides Clinton said herself...all rape victims need to be heard and believed. Well here you go..or are you calling Hillary a hypocrite?