Really freaked out after reading an "Incel" blog

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are lots of people out there who believe offensive things. There always have been. But now their blogs, basically a diary, is out there in public.

It doesn't matter, there aren't enough of these people to enslave you and force you into prostitution.

My freshman humanities teacher said her father said something similar in the very early 1930s. These people are nuts. No one intelligent pays attention to them. They'll never have enough power to do any harm. Within a decade, they controlled half of Europe.

There is a huge difference, though. Nazis expressed what most Germans though but didn't dare to say, especially in regards to Versailles peace treaty and Jews. My attitudes, on the other hand, are rejected by most men. While there are some men who do think like me and are afraid to say so, most men in today's society are degenerate feminists.

If you are shot, who do you blame, the bullet or the person who pulled the trigger? And which do you think these women are closer to? For me, the answer is unquestionably that they are like the bullet. Women are not capable of independent thought, so they cannot really be held responsible for their actions. All traditional societies have recognized this and have held the father or the husband responsible, while of course giving them the authority they needed to guide women’s behavior. Modern women can no more be blamed for their behavior than a spoiled toddler can be blamed for throwing a tantrum.

It is the men in modern culture who are fully responsible for the horrible culture that causes women to misbehave. If men came to their senses, they could instantly revoke women’s vote and enforce basic rules of decency including monogamy. It wouldn’t take long before women learned to behave in a civilized manner. So don’t think I blame women.

tib

No wonder you can't get laid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are you sure this blog isn't a joke?

He is opposed to a ban on prostitution and a lack of female premarital chastity.

So, he wants prostitution to be legal...but thinks women should retain their virginity until marriage.

How ironic.

Not ironic at all. That's how all most successful cultures functioned. Young boys would lose their virginity with prostitutes and some would use them in marriage for sexual variety, to which wife didn't object because male sexual infidelity isn't the same as female.
Marrying virgins is a natural male instinct which is being suppressed in a modern culture.

http://www.coalpha.org/Double-Standards-td6354329.html

Double standard: Extramarital sex is worse by women than by men.

Reason:

When a woman has extramarital sex, there is a chance that this will result in her husband raising a child that isn't his. But if a man has extramarital sex, there is no chance that this will result in his wife raising a child that isn't hers. This is a basic asymmetry. You could argue that contraception solves the problem. But our feelings evolved before contraception and the strength of our feelings are a result of the consequences in primitive times. This is why a cheating wife causes great emotional harm to her husband. Similarly, rape causes emotional distress to women because they lose control of choosing the father of their child. Rape with contraception doesn't reduce the emotional distress because this is a result of evolution, not logic.

What women really want from a husband is commitment. This is what they need to feel comfortable having children with the husband and raising a family. She wants commitment to be assured that the husband will always be there to support the family, especially when the wife is pregnant or with infants which put her in a weak position. So why are women so upset by male extramarital sex? Because modern women have been brainwashed to believe that male extramarital sex is an indication of lack of commitment. Historically you cannot find any instance of women complaining about casual extramarital sex by husbands before Paul started complaining about this in the New Testament. Of course women were jealous of mistresses throughout history, and this make sense since this is a real threat to her husband's commitment to her. It was Paul who introduced this terrible concept of male sexual fidelity to human culture. And even today, it is the degree of influence of Paul-based Christian culture on a society that determines the level of women's jealousy about male extramarital sex. Feminism is an extension of this culture and takes it to new extremes.


tib

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh geez, way to link to this wacko's blog on here. This same thing happened on another forum that I read and he came over and spread his mentally ill diatribe everywhere for days until he was banned. People do track where their blog hits are coming from ...

Another intelligent, tolerant liberal. If you don't like my posts ignore them.

tib

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No wonder you can't get laid.

Incel is a lack of a relationship as well. My greatest problem is not being able to find a girlfriend because modern women are repulsed by intelligence and morality.

tib

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This doesn't surprise me, sadly. Men the world over hate women. The world is still a pretty hostile place for women to live, even in the best countries.

I don't hate women. I just understand the differences between men and women and wouldn't allow women to abuse men by governing them, since women have no empathy for men.

"Misogynist" is a word that lost any real meaning thanks to feminist who use it for everybody who disagrees with them. It's now an empty word, just like "rape", which has also been extended to many normal male behaviors women actually like.

tib

[Anonymous]

Jeff, please ban the misogynist. His comments should not be tolerated any more than racist, homophobic, or other bigoted comments.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No wonder you can't get laid.

Incel is a lack of a relationship as well. My greatest problem is not being able to find a girlfriend because modern women are repulsed by intelligence and morality.

tib

Ha ha, that's not what is repulsive about you....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"I'm a registered Independent who largely leans Democrat. I've been lukewarmly committed to voting for HRC in 2016 if she runs. Now, I think that I am going to vote and campaign for whichever Democrat runs who seems least like to appease women-haters."

You are mistaken to think these mentally ill, extremist men are Republican.They see both major parties as two sides of the same evil coin and believe "a pox on both their houses" if they think about politics at all. Your vote would serve better to elect someone who supports an overhaul of the mental health system.

Mental health system should be overhauled, yes, but not in the way you think. It should be overhauled in a way that it is no longer in the service of leftist, liberal hate machine. Today's psychiatrists and psychologists are mostly feminist leftists. This is like person with ebola treating people.

Any shrink that would work with me would first have to prove his/her hatred for feminists.

tib

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jeff, please ban the misogynist. His comments should not be tolerated any more than racist, homophobic, or other bigoted comments.

What is bigoted about my comments? To me, believing in female suffrage is bigoted because it allows for abuse of men by women.

tib

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No wonder you can't get laid.

Incel is a lack of a relationship as well. My greatest problem is not being able to find a girlfriend because modern women are repulsed by intelligence and morality.

tib

Ha ha, that's not what is repulsive about you....

That is exactly what is repulsive about me.

Both Nazism and Liberalism are designed to exterminate a certain segment of the population. Nazism targeted certain races while Liberalism targets decent and intelligent people. I wish we had Apartheid where decent and intelligent people would be separated and put into our own ghettos. But Liberalism has no interest in separation of any kind. Liberalism is designed for the complete elimination of decent and intelligent people, giving us a pure Idiocracy.

There are some differences between Nazism and Liberalism. Nazism, coming from Germany, was more efficient and aimed for rapid extermination, while Liberal extermination is a slower process. This is why we have no death camps. Also, Nazism was intentional, the Germans being fairly intelligent people, while Liberalism is unintentional, since Liberals are fools. Liberals do not consciously want to eliminate anyone, but they are repulsed by decent people and, through Feminism, they have unintentionally managed to create a system that is highly effective at genetically eliminating decent people. And this is why incel exists.

tib

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:Jeff, please ban the misogynist. His comments should not be tolerated any more than racist, homophobic, or other bigoted comments.

As far as I can tell, this entire thread is about his blog. In that case, he certainly has the right to respond to the criticism. I wouldn't want a situation where our posters are allowed to attack him and he is prevented from responding. I can delete the entire thread, but it would probably be better if you just ignore the thread.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeff, please ban the misogynist. His comments should not be tolerated any more than racist, homophobic, or other bigoted comments.

As far as I can tell, this entire thread is about his blog. In that case, he certainly has the right to respond to the criticism. I wouldn't want a situation where our posters are allowed to attack him and he is prevented from responding. I can delete the entire thread, but it would probably be better if you just ignore the thread.

Thank you. It seems there are some of you here who have some decency.

tib

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeff, please ban the misogynist. His comments should not be tolerated any more than racist, homophobic, or other bigoted comments.

What is bigoted about my comments? To me, believing in female suffrage is bigoted because it allows for abuse of men by women.

tib

Besides, he is not a threat. He is like someone walking around with terrible body odor insisting it is actually attractive. Buddy, you are really repulsive. You need to do some thinking about why your "logical" and "intelligent" POV is getting you absolutely nowhere in life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeff, please ban the misogynist. His comments should not be tolerated any more than racist, homophobic, or other bigoted comments.

What is bigoted about my comments? To me, believing in female suffrage is bigoted because it allows for abuse of men by women.

tib

Besides, he is not a threat. He is like someone walking around with terrible body odor insisting it is actually attractive. Buddy, you are really repulsive. You need to do some thinking about why your "logical" and "intelligent" POV is getting you absolutely nowhere in life.

I did some thinking. It is because it's like throwing pearls before swine. Intelligence and decency are useful in societies where a sufficient number of people has these traits and where they are appreciated. Today's these traits are hated and people who have them mocked.

tib

[Anonymous]

CoAlpha dude: Are you, or have you been married? Do you have children?

Jeff, don't ban him, I think this is interesting