Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
|
Heck, ladies... If I lived near you, I'd be watching you like a HAWK!
Here are some good links for people who like to have information. If you prefer not to think about these things, nevermind: http://www.fas.org/programs/ssp/nukes/effects/falloutcalc.html Go to the bottom of the map, and plug in Washington. Note thet the fallout really spreads in a tight rectangle. If you are in the path of the fallout, you don't necessarily need to get the hell out of dodge, away from DC at all costs. You just need to get away from the way the fallout is moving. In some cases, thet might mean DON"T drive tpward Annapolis, drive a little north or south. O rjust stay put. This article was interesting. OK it is from the FreeRepublic, what can I say? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1429926/posts
|
|
I have a question for the women whose husbands are in the field, if you don't mind asking. (Or for anyone in the know).
Obviously there is information about this topic that cannot be shared publicly and I wouldn't expect people to share that. But of the publicly available information, where should people go to get the best information they can? In the event of a nuclear attack, or a direty bomb. What would be the most reliable source of real time information for civilians/citizens, trying to figure out what the best course of action is? A certain newsstation, or channel on a police radio? Twitter? God help me, please don't say the FEMA website....
Just wondering.... |
Thank you for posting. I am the poster that worked in DC on our emergency plan. I agree that all the projections showed any fallout from a dirty bomb going generally east, with the prevailing winds (jetstream). Poster with three kids in different schools, can you make a plan with another mom to do emergency pick ups and rendevous? |
|
My understanding is, in general, that kids in school will be kept in school if there is an incident of any kind. They generally do not relese the kids -- the schools won't even open their doors.
The exception, I guess, would be for the "connected" parent who gets secret insider information that somehting is headed our way, and can pick up her kids before the general populace is alerted. |
|
Analysts are projecting that the next terrorist attacks will occur in the Midwest. So despite where we THINK we should move, we'll never be 100% sure about our safety.
As they always say, you could get hit by a bus tomorrow. Maybe, just maybe, the world will view us differently under new leadership if Obama lives up to word and replaces bullying with diplomacy. |
OP again--which analysts? I am curious because that contradicts what the PPs said (the ones whose husbands are in counter-terrorism). Would you mind please sharing the sources of your information? Thanks! |
|
I can't offer much advice, because I am a fatalist cynic myself. (And I just finished reading the book "Traffic" that points out that more people die in car accidents in the US every month than died on 9/11.)
However, I do note that the report says that: "... unless the world community acts decisively and with great urgency, it is more likely than not that a weapon of mass destruction will be used in a terrorist attack somewhere in the world by the end of 2013." And it goes on to say that bio attack would be more likely. So the nuclear attack in DC scenario is what the experts call "low probability, high impact," the second part of that being what makes the media want to tell the story and makes you freak out. |
|
My DH's personal opinion is that when the jihadists get tired of us interrupting their large scale plots, or just when your local jihadist decides to do something locally outside of a terrorist cell - - we will start seeing suicide bombings in the US. Just like in Israel, Iraq, etc and from earlier days, with the IRA.
Another of my fears (it's cheap and fairly easy if your members aren't on the CIA's radar) is terrorists doing another school bombing like in Beslan a few years back. Now, THAT could be anywhere, USA and would drive a spike of terror into the hearts of Americans everywhere. |
Racial profiling and blatant discrimination,more than we have today, will thrive in that atmosphere. Denials of entry to the US based on nationality or ethnicity and maybe internment camps will be once again be acceptable. |
| Well, if an attack is imminent, I guess we should just evacuate the city now and set up a government in exile from an undisclosed location. |
This explains my husband's recent TDY... |
You're right. I would not be allowed to tell anyone. I did receive a tip once and it was very broad. It made sense about a week later once I saw it on the news. I didn't tell anyone, but a few people questioned why I was driving instead taking metro. |
TDY? Temporary Duty Yonder? |
I think it is misleading for us to keep coming back to "you are in more danger when you drive...." Of course we are all in more danger, statistically, when we drive, or heck, walk down our stairs. Because these are things we do EVERY DAY. It's not really.... fair I guess? To poo-poo terrorism fears just because there are risks in everyday life. We all will die. Most people die during the normal course of their daily lives. Car accident, heart attack, disease, whatever. When you look at statistics, of COURSE the likelihood of getting killed in a terrorist act is actually very, very small. But I STILL am going to do what I can to minimize my personal exposure to a likely future event. So no I don't prefer to work in DC, don't want to take the Metro, don't want to go to the Inauguration, heck don't even particularly want to fly if it can be avoided. Another example, I have read the statistic that people are most likely to get in a car accident within five miles of their own home. Why? Well because that's where you are driving most of the time. There is nothing inherently more dangerous about the roads within five miles of your house. It also is statistically unlikely that my child will be kidnapped. I still am not going to send her out to play by herself, or let her out of my sight in the mall, etc. There are some things that are too important to shrug off just because of statistics. |
The point is that by changing your behaviour in irrational ways - e.g. driving somewhere rather than flying due your fear of terror attacks - you may actually be increasing your risk, since the risk/mile is higher in a car than a plane. |