Penn State Scandal parallel to Beauvoir Pedophile

[Anonymous]

Just an aside... and parents of daughters don't be offended but I've been flabbergasted by the lack of interest or concern by dads (of daughters) about "pa Joe" or whatever they called him. This jack crap has got to go.

[Anonymous]

Let's not forget the lawyers' role in the Penn state thing. A graduate asst. tells Coach Paterno that he saw Sandusky raping a 10 year old in the shoer of the Penn State football stadium. Paterno tells the Athletic Director first thing the next morning. Then what happens. 10 days go by. Lawyer up, lawyer up, lawyer up until finally the AD goes into a meeting with the witness and bring's the person who's job it is to protect the financial interest of the school ( the VP of finance and the supervisor of campus police). That is a VERY weird combo of roles, perhaps a crafted one based on loyalty. Anyway, these two people take his statement, then later serve as witnesses for each other that the grad asst did not report anything of the kind that sounded like rape, "just horsing around". They have deniability because it is two against one. THAT whole move was done under legal advice.

Is that raquteering or just conspiracy. Or is it just being a sad sorry, amoral piece of crap of a human being. I hope they all go to jail for a long time( accessories to all the rapes that occured after) Will someone please tell me why/how the judge allowed this monster with a 20-30 year history as a child rapist out on $100,000 bond? He is a predator of the weakest , most vulnerable in our society. What was that judge thinking ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:13:13. It's not just in athletics. Priests and teachers, too. My son had a teacher who asked for two years to go alone to the movies with him and invited him alone to his home on weekend. Fourth and fifth grade. DC public school. Shudder, shudder.

Wait, what?! What were the circumstances of this, PP??

Yikes, was it David Parnigoni?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let's not forget the lawyers' role in the Penn state thing. A graduate asst. tells Coach Paterno that he saw Sandusky raping a 10 year old in the shoer of the Penn State football stadium. Paterno tells the Athletic Director first thing the next morning. Then what happens. 10 days go by. Lawyer up, lawyer up, lawyer up until finally the AD goes into a meeting with the witness and bring's the person who's job it is to protect the financial interest of the school ( the VP of finance and the supervisor of campus police). That is a VERY weird combo of roles, perhaps a crafted one based on loyalty. Anyway, these two people take his statement, then later serve as witnesses for each other that the grad asst did not report anything of the kind that sounded like rape, "just horsing around". They have deniability because it is two against one. THAT whole move was done under legal advice.

Is that raquteering or just conspiracy. Or is it just being a sad sorry, amoral piece of crap of a human being. I hope they all go to jail for a long time( accessories to all the rapes that occured after) Will someone please tell me why/how the judge allowed this monster with a 20-30 year history as a child rapist out on $100,000 bond? He is a predator of the weakest , most vulnerable in our society. What was that judge thinking ?

I heard the judge was involved with Sandusky's charity - I can't remember if he was a big donor, on the board, or what, but there is definitely a link there.

[Anonymous]

The culture--not the crime and particular circumstances reminds me of Landon. Win at all costs and protect the athletes, donors and others.

[Anonymous]

To be clear on one point: They way our legal system works... if the DC police (instead of the Cathedral Police) had been called at the time the camera was found, they probably would have only been able to do nothing more than remove Toth from the campus and begun their investigation. Yes, that would have preserved the crime season... but Toth very well may have fled because they had nothing to hold him on in the very beginning. Although the evidence was clearly child pornography, and Toth was clearly the obvious suspect, unless there was a known witness as to whom took the photos, the evidence has to be treated as purely circumstantial when first discovered. The DC police are not going to botch a case by making an arrest or actually hold (as in not release a suspect after questioning) someone for questioning before they at least investigate the evidence and obtain important related information. Before police call in a person of interest or suspect for questioning they find out the facts around the case; they build a case; so they are prepared for all/every excuse the person is going to use. And, if the police had questioned Toth immediately, he probably would not have been arrested immediately unless he admitted to the crime. The sad reality is that the guy probably would have had an opportunity to flee. I hope and pray that Toth will be found eventually and put away forever. I'm not saying the DC police should not have been called immediately, I agree that they should have; what I am saying is that it probably would not have made a difference in terms of Toth's fleeing.

[Anonymous]

I vehemently disagree as when he fled he was not told not to leave! He left because no one was watching him, no one told him he had to stay. Only he knew what he had done, and he wasn't staying around to find out what beavoir knew or didn't know. While the police may not have arrested him on the spot, they certainly would have questioned him, and would have made it clear he was under investigation. News would have been out long before 5 days.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I vehemently disagree as when he fled he was not told not to leave! He left because no one was watching him, no one told him he had to stay. Only he knew what he had done, and he wasn't staying around to find out what beavoir knew or didn't know. While the police may not have arrested him on the spot, they certainly would have questioned him, and would have made it clear he was under investigation. News would have been out long before 5 days.

If he was told to stay... all the more reason he would have fled. We will never know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's not forget the lawyers' role in the Penn state thing. A graduate asst. tells Coach Paterno that he saw Sandusky raping a 10 year old in the shoer of the Penn State football stadium. Paterno tells the Athletic Director first thing the next morning. Then what happens. 10 days go by. Lawyer up, lawyer up, lawyer up until finally the AD goes into a meeting with the witness and bring's the person who's job it is to protect the financial interest of the school ( the VP of finance and the supervisor of campus police). That is a VERY weird combo of roles, perhaps a crafted one based on loyalty. Anyway, these two people take his statement, then later serve as witnesses for each other that the grad asst did not report anything of the kind that sounded like rape, "just horsing around". They have deniability because it is two against one. THAT whole move was done under legal advice.

Is that raquteering or just conspiracy. Or is it just being a sad sorry, amoral piece of crap of a human being. I hope they all go to jail for a long time( accessories to all the rapes that occured after) Will someone please tell me why/how the judge allowed this monster with a 20-30 year history as a child rapist out on $100,000 bond? He is a predator of the weakest , most vulnerable in our society. What was that judge thinking ?

I heard the judge was involved with Sandusky's charity - I can't remember if he was a big donor, on the board, or what, but there is definitely a link there.

The judge who turned down the DA's request for $500,000 secured bond AND an ankle bracelet and released Sandusky to his own recog on $100,000 unsecured bond is a SHE. Shocking, I know. But then again in PA , judges are elected by the public for most court levels and they aren't necessarily educated in child predators or pedophila. They are not required to take continuing Ed in these areas. Or at least they weren't many years ago when I was working in Phila. I remember a horrific case in which a doctor at CHOP was testifying as an expert about a child abuse case and the judge ruled in the defendants favor saying that he didn't think the prosecution's ( the Phila DA's) case was made that the step-father did what the child and other witnessed and physical evidence showed because this judge thought and I quote ," if he really is a child abuser he would have beaten ALL the kids in the house, not just one". This judge was a male, had been voted onto the bench 30 years before and had no continuing Ed requirement eventhough he was a family court judge. Does it surprise ANYONE, after what we are all learning has been going on for decades in State College, that a judge might be "in the pocket" of powerful people in town. Just my humble opinion, of course.

[Anonymous]

Perhaps they are all hoping that he'll go kill himself and the trail that leads to all the lawyers and boosters and rumored pedophile ring will go cold when he kills himself outside of the careful watch of a prison cell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I vehemently disagree as when he fled he was not told not to leave! He left because no one was watching him, no one told him he had to stay. Only he knew what he had done, and he wasn't staying around to find out what beavoir knew or didn't know. While the police may not have arrested him on the spot, they certainly would have questioned him, and would have made it clear he was under investigation. News would have been out long before 5 days.

He left, no doubt, as he had fled before in other places where he had lived, when his lies and the carefully crafted persona he had crafted, came crashing down. For example, when he left Columbia and turned up at Purdue remade as an education major.This is a character trait that kicks in in times of extreme stress. Suicide or flee/change you identity ( a suicide of the self of sorts) Both actions are sociopathic and/or psychotic patterns. Doubt such a mind responds to an Adam 12 like" oh, and don't leave town because you may be needed for questioning". Personally, I would not want my child exposed to him at the moment he was confronted. Perhaps these were admin's concerns as well. Back a psycopath into a corner within 100 feet of 4, 5 and 6 year olds. Would you ? Or would you simply call security and get him out the door and off the campus, away from the kids, then call the police and let them do their jobs. As prior poster said, the law being what it is, the police can't do much while they build their case. Meanwhile that freak could have had a complete psychotic break then and there inside the school. It was a VERY difficult situation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Perhaps they are all hoping that he'll go kill himself and the trail that leads to all the lawyers and boosters and rumored pedophile ring will go cold when he kills himself outside of the careful watch of a prison cell.

Speaking of Sandusky.

[Anonymous]

Toth was never at Columbia, perhaps you are thinking of Cornell. And we don't know why he left Cornell.

I don't think that the DC police would have just escorted him off the property, I think they would have taken him in for questioning. The whole "case" would have been different. We don't know what the police would have done beyond questing him. We don't know if Toth would have fled. We can speculate all we want.

My personal view is that had the police been called in a timely fashion, they would have questioned him, he would not have been able to take his money out of the bank without notice, drive to the midwest and use credit cards (the police tracked down WEEKS later that he bought a GPS at a best buy in illinois or indiana, I can't remember), get help from his family (at the time they helped him he was not a fugitive) and continue to contact children and families. It would have been different, perhaps resulting in him rotting behind bars where he belongs rather than roaming freely around the country likely concocting more lies and hurting more innocent children.

[Anonymous]

1998 people went to the police and nothing happened. The whole place sinks.

[Anonymous]

Could any current Beauvoir parent comment on the school's current environment? For example, have you seen the school address this issue head-on and talk about how it screens its teachers or teacher policies with regard to being alone with students? We are considering sending our child there for PRE-K.